先行名詞の意味役割の分析を通して見た 「に対して」と「に」の互換問題 -韓国語「e dae[對]haeseo」「e/ege」との対照を中心に-

Abstract

In this paper, in order to establish the conditions for the possibility ofinterchanging the compound case particle “ni taishite” with the simple case particle“ni”, I analyzed the meanings of the nouns preceding the simple case particle “ni”and the co-occurring case particle “wo”. Also, following the same method, I analyzedthe Korean “e daehaeseo” and“e/ege”. Concretely, I investigated the “ga-ni-wo” three object verbal structure thatimplicates the movement of the noun phrase marked with “wo” and the respectiveKorean “e daehaeseo”, according to the following criteria:i. Whether the noun phrase marked by “ni”-“e/ege” represents “arrival point”ii. Whether the structure containing “ni”-“e/ege” can be interpreted as a possessivechange structureiii. Whether the noun phrase marked by “wo”-“(l)eul” is concrete objectAs a result, the following two points were clarified:1. In the case of Japanese, the typical “point of arrival ni” case marker for the “changeof position” structure cannot be interchanged with “ni taishite” but, “the possessivechange structure ni” is interchangeable with “ni taishite”. Also, “ni” that doesn’texpress “arrival point” can also be interchanged with “ni taishite”. 2. In the case of Korean, irrespective of the meaning distinctive features of the casemarker for “arrival point” ,“interlocutor” etc “e/ege” and the interpretations as“change of place structure”, “possessive change structure”, the cases where the simplecase marker “e/ege” is interchangeable with “e daehaeseo” are extremely rare. However, in the case where “ni” does not express “arrival point”, both “e/ege” and“e daehaeseo” are allowed.