본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

岸田政府外交政策及其影响因素分析:以新古典现实主义为视角

An Analysis of Kishida Government's Foreign Policy and Its Influencing Factors: From the perspective of neoclassical realism

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

After taking office, Fumio Kishida not only inherited Abe's “positive pacifism” diplomatic line, but also further developed it into “realism diplomacy in the new era.” The specific foreign policy of the Kishida administration consists of four aspects. First, the Kishida administration emphasizes on strengthening the close cooperation between Japan and the United States with the U.S.-Japan alliance as the cornerstone to jointly cope with regional and international challenges. Second, promote domestic economic development and enhance international competitiveness through economic diplomacy. Third, actively participate in the “Free Indo-Pacific Strategy” and strengthen cooperation with countries in the Indo-Pacific region to try to balance regional power. Fourthly, tries to build international image and enhance international status through values diplomacy. Based on the theory of neo-classical realism, this paper analyzes the influencing factors of Kishida government's foreign policy, which can be summarized into three levels: the first level is the level of international system. Japan is facing systemic pressure brought by the strategic competition between China and the United States. At the same time, events such as the Ukraine conflict have further aggravated the complexity of its international environment, which has compressed Japan's diplomatic space. The second level is domestic politics. Influenced by Japan's strategic culture, the Kishida government emphasized security needs in its diplomacy. At the same time, Japan's domestic system, government, government and finance triangle system is rigid, and there is the problem of “political black gold”; Japanese society as a whole has shifted to the right, and people's sense of “political alienation” has intensified. The third level is the leadership level. Mr. Kishida is a weak man whose foreign policy largely follows the lines of the Liberal Democratic Party for more than a decade. In addition, there are many factions in the Liberal Democratic Party, and the forces of all parties are strained and difficult to form a joint force.

Abstract

After taking office, Fumio Kishida not only inherited Abe's “positive pacifism” diplomatic line, but also further developed it into “realism diplomacy in the new era.” The specific foreign policy of the Kishida administration consists of four aspects. First, the Kishida administration emphasizes on strengthening the close cooperation between Japan and the United States with the U.S.-Japan alliance as the cornerstone to jointly cope with regional and international challenges. Second, promote domestic economic development and enhance international competitiveness through economic diplomacy. Third, actively participate in the “Free Indo-Pacific Strategy” and strengthen cooperation with countries in the Indo-Pacific region to try to balance regional power. Fourthly, tries to build international image and enhance international status through values diplomacy. Based on the theory of neo-classical realism, this paper analyzes the influencing factors of Kishida government's foreign policy, which can be summarized into three levels: the first level is the level of international system. Japan is facing systemic pressure brought by the strategic competition between China and the United States. At the same time, events such as the Ukraine conflict have further aggravated the complexity of its international environment, which has compressed Japan's diplomatic space. The second level is domestic politics. Influenced by Japan's strategic culture, the Kishida government emphasized security needs in its diplomacy. At the same time, Japan's domestic system, government, government and finance triangle system is rigid, and there is the problem of “political black gold”; Japanese society as a whole has shifted to the right, and people's sense of “political alienation” has intensified. The third level is the leadership level. Mr. Kishida is a weak man whose foreign policy largely follows the lines of the Liberal Democratic Party for more than a decade. In addition, there are many factions in the Liberal Democratic Party, and the forces of all parties are strained and difficult to form a joint force.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 崔向平, "新古典现实主义理论评析", 社会科学战线, 05, pp.271~275 (2020), 吉林省社会科学院
  2. 巩浩宇, "战略文化视角下日本对华海洋战略的构想与实践", 边界与海洋研究, 05, pp.47~63 (2022), 武汉大学
  3. 霍建岗, "日本首相岸田文雄", 国际研究参考, 10, pp.43~48 (2021), 中国现代国际关系研究院
  4. 李枏, "危局下的东北亚安全形势", 世界知识, 05, pp.28~30 (2024), 世界知识出版社
  5. 卢昊, "乌克兰危机下的日美同盟形势与战略影响", 东北亚学刊, 05, pp.13~29+146 (2023), 天津社会科学院
  6. 吕耀东, "日本“新时代现实主义外交”理念及其政策取向", 日本学刊, 06, pp.1~22+168 (2023), 中国社会科学院日本研究所 ․中华日本学会
  7. 吕耀东, "岸田政府与日本外交及安保政策取向", 日本研究, 04, pp.1~10 (2021), 中国社会科学院日本研究所․中华日本学会
  8. 孙晶, "日本“权力铁三角”变异反思", 人民论坛, 12, pp.35~ (2014), 人民日报社
  9. 孙志娟, "俄乌冲突对全球粮食供应稳定性的影响及我国保障粮食安全的响应机制研究", 粮食与饲料工业, 06, pp.4~9 (2023), 国家粮食储备局․武汉科学研究设计院
  10. 王永东, "日本集团主义的假象", 学海, 06, pp.198~202 (2014), 江苏省社会科学院
  11. 邢伟旌, "“特别全球伙伴关系”框架下日本对乌克兰政策调整", 现代国际关系, 12, pp.110~131+163 (2023), 中国现代国际关系研究院
  12. 熊达云, "日本政治右倾化是一个长期形成的过程", 东北亚学刊, 06, pp.34~37 (2018), 天津社会科学院
  13. 徐万胜, "日本民主党政权的同盟战略与中日关系", 和平与发展, 02, pp.60~64 +72 (2012), 和平与发展研究中心
  14. 杨佳腾, "岸田内阁深受“金权政治”丑闻冲击", 世界知识, 02, pp.32~34 (2024), 世界知识出版社
  15. 姚泽宇, "岸田政府“新时代现实主义外交”理念下的对华政策", 东北亚学刊, 02, pp.75~88+148 (2023), 天津社会科学院
  16. 赵明昊, "The adjustment of US hegemony protection strategy and the future of China-US relations", China International Studies, 06, pp.18~ (2023), 中国国际问题研究院
  17. 杨森, "政官财三角体制视角下战后日本政商关系透析", pp.35~ (2021), 上海师范大学
  18. 五百旗頭真, "ウクライナ危機と日本国民の意識変化", 防衛学研究, 03, pp.207~ (2023)
  19. Gilpin R, "The theory of hegemonic war", The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4), pp.591~613 (1988)
  20. Paul Poast, "Issue Linkage and International Cooperation: An Empirical Investigation", Conflict Management and Peace Science, 30(3), pp.287~290 (2013)
  21. Rathbun B., "A rose by any other name: Neoclassical realism as the logical and necessary extension of structural realism", Security Studies, pp.294~321 (2008)
  22. Brooks S G, "World out of balance: international relations and the challenge of American primacy" (2008), Princeton University Press
  23. Thomas J. Christenson, "Useful Adversaries:Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947-1958" (1996), Princeton University Press
  24. Zakaria F., "From wealth to power: The unusual origins of America's world role" (1999), Princeton University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)