본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Anti-consumption Effect on the Car Sharing Utility: The Moderating Effect of Brand Luxury Level

Hee-Jung LEE
한국유통과학회 (Korea Distribution Science Association)|2020.06|유통과학연구 (Journal of Distribution Science)|제18권 제6호|pp. 63-75|DOI 10.15722/jds.18.6.202006.63

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Car Sharing ServicePerceived UtilityAnti-ConsumptionCommercial Sharing Service (CSS)Brand Luxury Level

초록

Purpose: This study examines the motivations that prompt customers to use commercial sharing services (CSSs), and the relationship between anti-consumption and the perceived utility of CSSs in the fashion-sharing business. This study tries to understand how the two types of anti-consumption can differentially affect consumers’ perceived utility to use CSSs. In particular, as the types of CSS have diversified and many consumers have used them, it can be expected that the influence of anti-consumption on the perceived utility of CSSs can change, depending on the field where the CSS is applied. Research design, data and methodology: The structural equation modeling (SEM) with the SPSS 22.0 and AMOS 18.0 programs was used. Results: This study found that (i) two types of anticonsumption (voluntary and selective) differentially affect the perceived utilities to use CSSs; (ii) the two types of anti-consumption differentially affect the perceived utility to use CSSs depending on the level of the brand. Conclusions: In order to promote the spread of consumers' use in the sharing economy, it will be possible to identify what important utility is and make a meaningful contribution to the establishment of future marketing strategies.

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the motivations that prompt customers to use commercial sharing services (CSSs), and the relationship between anti-consumption and the perceived utility of CSSs in the fashion-sharing business. This study tries to understand how the two types of anti-consumption can differentially affect consumers’ perceived utility to use CSSs. In particular, as the types of CSS have diversified and many consumers have used them, it can be expected that the influence of anti-consumption on the perceived utility of CSSs can change, depending on the field where the CSS is applied. Research design, data and methodology: The structural equation modeling (SEM) with the SPSS 22.0 and AMOS 18.0 programs was used. Results: This study found that (i) two types of anticonsumption (voluntary and selective) differentially affect the perceived utilities to use CSSs; (ii) the two types of anti-consumption differentially affect the perceived utility to use CSSs depending on the level of the brand. Conclusions: In order to promote the spread of consumers' use in the sharing economy, it will be possible to identify what important utility is and make a meaningful contribution to the establishment of future marketing strategies.

참고문헌 (79)

  1. Eunkyoung Ahn, "Shopping for Oneself : Motives and Orientations of Small Luxury Purchase as Self-Gifting", International Journal of Costume and Fashion, 16(1), pp.87~107 (2016), 한국복식학회
  2. Alba, J. W., "Pleasure principles : A review of research on hedonic consumption", Journal of consumer psychology, 23(1), pp.2~18 (2013)
  3. Albinsson, P. A., "Alternative marketplaces in the 21st century : Building community through sharing events", Journal of consumer Behaviour, 11(4), pp.303~315 (2012)
  4. Anderson, J. C., "Structural equation modeling in practice : A review and recommended two-step approach", Psychological bulletin, 103(3), pp.411~423 (1988)
  5. Aydin, H., "The Relationship Between Consumption Value And Voluntary Simplicity Lifestyle And Effect On Environmentally Responsible Consumerism", Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, 5(3), pp.35~47 (2017)
  6. Aydin, H., "A study on the effects of the consumer lifestyles on sustainable consumption", Inquiry, 1(2), pp.133~152 (2016)
  7. Bagozzi, R. P., "On the evaluation of structural equation models", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, pp.74~94 (1988)
  8. Bardhi, F., "Access-based consumption : The case of car sharing", Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), pp.881~898 (2012)
  9. Bearden, W. O., "Sample size effects on chi square and other statistics used in evaluating causal models", Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), pp.425~430 (1982)
  10. Belk, R., "Why not share rather than own?", The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), pp.126~140 (2007)
  11. Belk, R., "Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing" (2010)
  12. Belk, R., "You are what you can access : Sharing and collaborative consumption online", Journal of Business Research, 67(8), pp.1595~1600 (2014)
  13. Bhattacherjee, A., "Understanding information systems continuance : an expectation-confirmation model", MIS quarterly, 25(3), pp.351~370 (2001)
  14. Blackwell, R. D., "Consumer behavior" (2001), South-Western Thomas Learning
  15. Botsman, R., "Beyond Zipcar : Collaborative Consumption", Harvard Business Review, 88(10), pp.30~31 (2010)
  16. Bostman, R., "What’s mine is yours. How collaborative consumption is changing the way we live" (2011), Harper Collins
  17. Bucher, E., "What's mine is yours(for a nominal fee)–Exploring the spectrum of utilitarian to altruistic motives for Internet-mediated sharing", Computers in Human Behavior, 62(1), pp.316~326 (2016)
  18. Buczynski, B., "Sharing is good : How to save money, time and resources through collaborative consumption" (2013), New Society Publishers
  19. Caprariello, P. A., "To do, to have, or to share? Valuing experiences over material possessions depends on the involvement of others", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), pp.199~215 (2013)
  20. Carlson, E. N., "Self‐other knowledge asymmetries in personality pathology", Journal of Personality, 81(2), pp.155~170 (2013)
  21. Churchill, G. A. Jr., "A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs", Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), pp.64~73 (1979)
  22. Craig‐Lees, M., "Understanding voluntary simplifiers", Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), pp.187~210 (2002)
  23. Dhar, R., "Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods", Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), pp.60~71 (2000)
  24. Etzioni, A., "Essays in Socio-Economics" (1999), Springer
  25. Finkenauer, C., "Investigating the role of time in affective forecasting : Temporal influences on forecasting accuracy", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(8), pp.1152~1166 (2007)
  26. Fornell, C., "Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error : Algebra and statistics", Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), pp.382~388 (1981)
  27. Fullagar, S., "Slow tourism : Experiences and mobilities" (2012), Channel View Publications
  28. Gansky, L., "The mesh : Why the future of business is sharing" (2010), Penguin
  29. Gregg, R., "Voluntary simplicity", Visva-Bharati Quarterly, 2(1), pp.27~46 (1936)
  30. Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis" (1998), Prentice hall
  31. Hamari, J., "The sharing economy : Why people participate in collaborative consumption", Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), pp.2047~2059 (2016)
  32. Han, Y. J., "Signaling status with luxury goods : The role of brand prominence", Journal of Marketing, 74(4), pp.15~30 (2010)
  33. Harrison-Walker, L. J., "The measurement of word-ofmouth communication and an investigation of service quality and customer commitment as potential antecedents", Journal of Service Research, 4(1), pp.60~75 (2001)
  34. Heine, K., "Trading-up mass-market goods to luxury products", Australasian Marketing Journal, 19(2), pp.108~114 (2011)
  35. Hellwig, K., "Exploring different types of sharing : A proposed segmentation of the market for ―sharing‖ businesses", Psychology &Marketing, 32(9), pp.891~906 (2015)
  36. Hennig-Thurau, T., "Understanding relationship marketing outcomes : an integration of relational benefits and relationship quality", Journal of Service Research, 4(3), pp.230~247 (2002)
  37. Hennig-Thurau, T., "Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet?", Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), pp.38~52 (2004)
  38. Hennig-Thurau, T., "Consumer file sharing of motion pictures", Journal of Marketing, 71(4), pp.1~18 (2007)
  39. Hildebrandt, L., "Consumer retail satisfaction in rural areas : A reanalysis of survey data", Journal of Economic Psychology, 8(1), pp.19~42 (1987)
  40. Iacobucci, D., "Mean centering helps alleviate ―micro‖ but not ―macro‖ multicollinearity", Behavior research methods, 48(4), pp.1308~1317 (2016)
  41. Iwata, O., "An evaluation of consumerism and lifestyle as correlates of a voluntary simplicity lifestyle", Social Behavior and Personality : an international journal, 34(5), pp.557~568 (2006)
  42. Janssen, C., "Should luxury brands say it out loud? Brand conspicuousness and consumer perceptions of responsible luxury", Journal of Business Research, 77(1), pp.167~174 (2017)
  43. Jeong, E., "Restaurant experiences triggering positive electronic word-of-mouth(eWOM)motivations", International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(2), pp.356~366 (2011)
  44. John, N. A., "The social logics of sharing", The Communication Review, 16(3), pp.113~131 (2013)
  45. 주재훈, "Motives for Participating in Sharing Economy: Intentions to Use Car Sharing Services", 유통과학연구, 15(2), pp.21~26 (2017), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  46. Kapferer, J. N., "The future of luxury : Challenges and opportunities", Journal of Brand Management, 21(9), pp.716~726 (2014)
  47. Min-Soo KIM, "Promoting Word-of-Mouth communication: The moderating role of leisure sport social media", 유통과학연구, 18(4), pp.61~72 (2020), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  48. Lamberton, C. P., "When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems", Journal of Marketing, 76(4), pp.109~125 (2012)
  49. Lance, C. E., "Method effects, measurement error, and substantive conclusions", Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), pp.435~455 (2010)
  50. Lawson, S. J., "Freedom from ownership : An exploration of access-based consumption", Journal of Business Research, 69(8), pp.2615~2623 (2016)
  51. Lee, Jung-Wan, "Effects of Consumers’ Demographic Profile on Mobile Commerce Adoption", 유통과학연구, 8(1), pp.5~11 (2010), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  52. Lee, M. S., "Anti-consumption and brand avoidance", Journal of Business Research, 62(2), pp.169~180 (2009)
  53. Leonard-Barton, D., "Voluntary simplicity lifestyles and energy conservation", Journal of Consumer Research, 8(3), pp.243~252 (1981)
  54. Lien, C. H., "Examining WeChat users' motivations, trust, attitudes, and positive word-of-mouth : Evidence from China", Computers in Human Behavior, 41(1), pp.104~111 (2014)
  55. Martin, C. J., "Commercial orientation in grassroots social innovation : Insights from the sharing economy", Ecological Economics, 118(1), pp.240~251 (2015)
  56. McDonald, S., "Toward sustainable consumption : Researching voluntary simplifiers", Psychology & Marketing, 23(6), pp.515~534 (2006)
  57. Miao, L., "The hedonic value of hospitality consumption : Evidence from spring break experiences", Journal of Hospitality Marketing &Management, 23(2), pp.99~121 (2014)
  58. Moeller, S., "The burdens of ownership : reasons for preferring renting", Managing Service Quality : An International Journal, 20(2), pp.176~191 (2010)
  59. Möhlmann, M., "Collaborative consumption : determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again", Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(3), pp.193~207 (2015)
  60. Neoh, J. G., "What encourages people to carpool? An evaluation of factors with meta-analysis", Transportation, 44(2), pp.423~447 (2017)
  61. Nepomuceno, M. V., "The impact of materialism and anti-consumption lifestyles on personal debt and account balances", Journal of Business Research, 68(3), pp.654~664 (2015)
  62. Oh, S. Y., "Attract small luxury users", Marketing, 43(2), pp.77~80 (2009)
  63. Overby, J. W., "The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions", Journal of Business research, 59(10-11), pp.1160~1166 (2006)
  64. Ozanne, L. K., "Sharing as a form of anti‐consumption? An examination of toy library users", Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), pp.485~498 (2010)
  65. Peyer, M., "The role of sustainability in profiling voluntary simplifiers", Journal of Business Research, 70(1), pp.37~43 (2017)
  66. Podsakoff, P. M., "Common method biases in behavioral research : A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), pp.879~903 (2003)
  67. Shama, A., "Coping with staglation : voluntary simplicity", Journal of Marketing, 45(3), pp.120~134 (1981)
  68. Shama, A., "Values of voluntary simplicity : Lifestyle and motivation", Psychological Reports, 55(1), pp.231~240 (1984)
  69. Sharma, E., "Financial deprivation prompts consumers to seek scarce goods", Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), pp.545~560 (2012)
  70. Shaw, D., "Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption", Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), pp.167~185 (2002)
  71. Steenkamp, J. B. E., "The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs", International Journal of Research in marketing, 8(4), pp.283~299 (1991)
  72. 성영애, "소비절제를 추구하는 라이프스타일과 행복에 관한 연구", 소비자학연구, 27(2), pp.233~254 (2016), 한국소비자학회
  73. Tsai, D. S., "On generating meaningful shares in visual secret sharing scheme", The Imaging Science Journal, 56(1), pp.49~55 (2008)
  74. Vigneron, F., "A review and a conceptual framework of prestige-seeking consumer behavior", Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1(1), pp.1~15 (1999)
  75. Vigneron, F., "Measuring perceptions of brand luxury", Journal of Brand Management, 11(6), pp.484~506 (2004)
  76. Voss, K. E., "Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude", Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), pp.310~320 (2003)
  77. Wittel, A., "Qualities of sharing and their transformations in the digital age", International Review of Information Ethics, 15(9), pp.3~8 (2011)
  78. Yang, S., "Why are customers loyal in sharing-economy services? A relational benefits perspective", Journal of Services Marketing, 31(1), pp.48~62 (2017)
  79. Zhu, G., "Inside the sharing economy : Understanding consumer motivations behind the adoption of mobile applications", International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(9), pp.2218~2239 (2017)

관련 논문AI추천

소비절제 라이프스타일이 상업적 공유 경제 시스템 수용에 미치는 영향: 공유 효용을 중심으로이희정한국소비자학회 · 소비자학연구2018 · 제29권 제6호Motives for Participating in Sharing Economy: Intentions to Use Car Sharing Services주재훈한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2017 · 제15권 제2호소비자의 사회적계층이 명품패션공유서비스 이용의도에 미치는 영향: 소비절제 세 가지 유형의 매개효과, 중고제품에 대한 평소 태도의 조절효과를 중심으로이희정, 차문경한국소비자학회 · 소비자학연구2020 · 제31권 제5호Conspicuous value and luxury purchase intention in sharing economy in emerging markets: The moderating role of past sustainable behaviorJain Sheetal, Mishra Sita, Pandey Ritesh한국마케팅과학회 · Journal of Global Fashion Marketing2023 · 제14권 제1호선택적 소비절제(작은 사치) 경향이 명품공유서비스에 대한 효용인식과 이용의도에 미치는 영향: 명품브랜드 수준에 따른 조절효과이희정, 차문경한국소비문화학회 · 소비문화연구2020 · 제23권 제2호카셰어링 서비스의 쇼핑가치가 브랜드 충성도 및 이용의도에 미치는 영향김준환, 송정란중소기업융합학회 · 융합정보논문지2018 · 제8권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

A Study on the Effect of Service Quality, Consumer Empathy and Shopping Value on Curation Commerce SatisfactionMin-Jung Kangpp. 5-14A Study on the Impact of Cultural Contact Service on Brand EquityOk-Chul SHIN, Jin-Woo PARKpp. 15-24A Study on the Behavior of the User according to the Distribution Development of Online Travel AgencySun-Mi LEE, So-Ra MINpp. 25-35Factors Influencing Consumer’s Purchase Intention on Beauty Products in YoutubeNadia Annisa ROSARA, Amia LUTHFIApp. 37-46The Determinants of Distribution of Credit: Evidence from VietnamGiang Hoang PHAM, Anh Thi TRAN, Tue Dang NGUYENpp. 47-56
원문 보기