A comparative study of frictional force in self-ligating brackets according to the bracket-archwire angulation, bracket material, and wire type
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: This study aimed to compare the frictional force (FR) in self-ligating brackets among different bracket-archwire angles, bracket materials, and archwire types. Methods: Passive and active metal self-ligating brackets and active ceramic self-ligating brackets were included as experimental groups, while conventional twin metal brackets served as a control group. All brackets were maxillary premolar brackets with 0.022 inch [in] slots and a −7o torque. The orthodontic wires used included 0.018 round and 0.019 × 0.025 in rectangular stainless steel wires. The FR was measured at 0o, 5o, and 10o angulations as the wire was drawn through the bracket slots after attaching brackets from each group to the universal testing machine. Static and kinetic FRs were also measured. Results: The passive self-ligating brackets generated a lower FR than all the other brackets. Static and kinetic FRs generally increased with an increase in the bracket-archwire angulation, and the rectangular wire caused significantly higher static and kinetic FRs than the round wire (p < 0.001). The metal passive self-ligating brackets exhibited the lowest static FR at the 0o angulation and a lower increase in static and kinetic FRs with an increase in bracket-archwire angulation than the other brackets, while the conventional twin brackets showed a greater increase than all three experimental brackets. Conclusions: The passive self-ligating brackets showed the lowest FR in this study. Self-ligating brackets can generate varying FRs in vitro according to the wire size, surface characteristics, and bracket-archwire angulation. [Korean J Orthod 2015;45(1):13-19]
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the frictional force (FR) in self-ligating brackets among different bracket-archwire angles, bracket materials, and archwire types. Methods: Passive and active metal self-ligating brackets and active ceramic self-ligating brackets were included as experimental groups, while conventional twin metal brackets served as a control group. All brackets were maxillary premolar brackets with 0.022 inch [in] slots and a −7o torque. The orthodontic wires used included 0.018 round and 0.019 × 0.025 in rectangular stainless steel wires. The FR was measured at 0o, 5o, and 10o angulations as the wire was drawn through the bracket slots after attaching brackets from each group to the universal testing machine. Static and kinetic FRs were also measured. Results: The passive self-ligating brackets generated a lower FR than all the other brackets. Static and kinetic FRs generally increased with an increase in the bracket-archwire angulation, and the rectangular wire caused significantly higher static and kinetic FRs than the round wire (p < 0.001). The metal passive self-ligating brackets exhibited the lowest static FR at the 0o angulation and a lower increase in static and kinetic FRs with an increase in bracket-archwire angulation than the other brackets, while the conventional twin brackets showed a greater increase than all three experimental brackets. Conclusions: The passive self-ligating brackets showed the lowest FR in this study. Self-ligating brackets can generate varying FRs in vitro according to the wire size, surface characteristics, and bracket-archwire angulation. [Korean J Orthod 2015;45(1):13-19]
참고문헌 (22)
- Stoner MM, "Force control in clinical practice", Am J Orthod, 46, pp.163~186 (1960)
- Kwak C, "A study on the changes of frictional force between bracket and orthodontic wire with time in artificial saliva", Korean J Orthod, 23, pp.283~294 (1993)
- Hwang HS, "An experimental study on frictional forces of various orthodontic wires under artificial saliva.", Korean J Orthod, 19, pp.245~256 (1989)
- Ko JS, "Frictional forces between orthodontic wire and bracket under artificial saliva", Korean J Orthod, 18, pp.55~64 (1988)
- Lee JH, "An experimental study of dynamic frictional resistance between orthodontic bracket and arch wire", Korean J Orthod, 31, pp.467~477 (2001)
- Min JM, "A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic brackets and arch wire during sliding movement of teeth", Korean J Orthod, 18, pp.155~163 (1988)
- Sung HM, "Comparison of the frictional resistance between orthodontic bracket & archwire", Korean J Orthod, 21, pp.543~559 (1991)
- Proffit WR, "Contemporary orthodontics", pp.263~ (1986), the C.V. Mosby Co
- Peterson L, "A comparison of friction resistance for Nitinol and stainless steel wire in edgewise brackets", Quintessence Int Dent Dig, 13, pp.563~571 (1982)
- Thorstenson GA, "Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 121, pp.472~482 (2002)
- Kusy RP, "Influence of archwire and bracket dimensions on sliding mechanics: derivations and determinations of the critical contact angles for binding", Eur J Orthod, 21, pp.199~208 (1999)
- Cacciafesta V, "Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracketarchwire combinations", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.403~409 (2003)
- Maijer R, "Time savings with self-ligating brackets", J Clin Orthod, 24, pp.29~31 (1990)
- 김훈, "자가결찰브라켓을 이용한 교정 치료의 임상적 고려사항", 대한치과교정학회지, 36(6), pp.474~482 (2006), 대한치과교정학회
- Pizzoni L, "Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets", Eur J Orthod, 20, pp.283~291 (1998)
- Cacciafesta V, "Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.395~402 (2003)
- Garner LD, "A comparison of frictional forces during simulated canine retraction of a continuous edgewise arch wire", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 90, pp.199~203 (1986)
- Pratten DH, "Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 98, pp.398~403 (1990)
- Frank CA, "A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire", Am J Orthod, 78, pp.593~609 (1980)
- Shin HJ, "The effect of ligation method on the frictional force between orthodontic bracket and archwire", Korean J Orthod, 28, pp.813~823 (1998)
- Tecco S, "Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model", Angle Orthod, 75, pp.1041~1045 (2005)
- Thorstenson GA, "Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of selfligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 122, pp.295~305 (2002)