Effect of different combinations of bracket, archwire and ligature on resistance to sliding and axial rotational control during the first stage of orthodontic treatment: An in-vitro study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: This study was performed to explore the effect of different bracket, archwire, and ligature combinations on resistance to sliding (RS) and rotational control in first-order angulation. Methods: Three types of brackets (multi-level low friction [MLF], self-ligating, and conventional brackets) coupled with four nickel-titanium archwires (0.012, 0.014, 0.016, and 0.018-inch diameter) and two stainless steel ligatures (0.20 and 0.25 mm) were tested in different firstorder angulations (0o, 2o, 4o, 6o, 8o, 10o, 15o, 20o) by using an Instron universal mechanical machine in the dry state at room temperature. RS value was evaluated and compared by one-way ANOVA. Results: Under the same angulation, the RS values showed the following order: conventional brackets > MLF brackets > selfligating brackets. The RS was the highest for conventional brackets and showed a tendency to increase. The RS for MLF brackets coupled with thinner archwires and ligatures showed a similar tendency as the RS for the self-ligating bracket. In contrast, the RS for MLF brackets coupled with thicker archwires and ligatures increased like that for conventional brackets. MLF brackets showed the greatest range of critical contact angles in first-order angulation. Conclusions: The RS in first-order angulation is influenced by bracket design, archwire, and ligature dimension. In comparison with self-ligating and conventional brackets, MLF brackets could express low friction and rotational control with their greater range of critical contact angles.
Abstract
Objective: This study was performed to explore the effect of different bracket, archwire, and ligature combinations on resistance to sliding (RS) and rotational control in first-order angulation. Methods: Three types of brackets (multi-level low friction [MLF], self-ligating, and conventional brackets) coupled with four nickel-titanium archwires (0.012, 0.014, 0.016, and 0.018-inch diameter) and two stainless steel ligatures (0.20 and 0.25 mm) were tested in different firstorder angulations (0o, 2o, 4o, 6o, 8o, 10o, 15o, 20o) by using an Instron universal mechanical machine in the dry state at room temperature. RS value was evaluated and compared by one-way ANOVA. Results: Under the same angulation, the RS values showed the following order: conventional brackets > MLF brackets > selfligating brackets. The RS was the highest for conventional brackets and showed a tendency to increase. The RS for MLF brackets coupled with thinner archwires and ligatures showed a similar tendency as the RS for the self-ligating bracket. In contrast, the RS for MLF brackets coupled with thicker archwires and ligatures increased like that for conventional brackets. MLF brackets showed the greatest range of critical contact angles in first-order angulation. Conclusions: The RS in first-order angulation is influenced by bracket design, archwire, and ligature dimension. In comparison with self-ligating and conventional brackets, MLF brackets could express low friction and rotational control with their greater range of critical contact angles.
참고문헌 (26)
- Kusy RP, "Friction between different wire-bracket configurations and materials", Semin Orthod, 3, pp.166~177 (1997)
- Kusy RP, "Influence of archwire and bracket dimensions on sliding mechanics : derivations and determinations of the critical contact angles for binding", Eur J Orthod, 21, pp.199~208 (1999)
- Kusy RP, "Resistance to sliding of orthodontic appliances in the dry and wet states : influence of archwire alloy, interbracket distance, and bracket engagement", J Biomed Mater Res, 52, pp.797~811 (2000)
- Harradine NW, "Self-ligating brackets : where are we now", J Orthod, 30, pp.262~273 (2003)
- Chen SS, "Systematic review of self-ligating brackets", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.726.e1~726.e18 (2010)
- Fleming PS, "Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics. A systematic review", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.575~584 (2010)
- Ong E, "Efficiency of self-ligating vs conventionally ligated brackets during initial alignment", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 138, pp.138.e1~138.e7 (2010)
- Miles PG, "Smartclip versus conventional twin brackets for initial alignment: is there a difference?", Aust Orthod J, 21, pp.123~127 (2005)
- Miles PG, "A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment", Angle Orthod, 76, pp.480~485 (2006)
- Fleming PS, "Randomized clinical trial of orthodontic treatment efficiency with self-ligating and conventional fixed orthodontic appliances", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.738~742 (2010)
- Chen S, "Clinical application of the PASS technique", J Clin Orthod, 49, pp.508~515 (2015)
- Ko CC, "Physiologic Anchorage control: a new orthodontic concept and its clinical application", pp.71~86 (2017), Springer
- Nanda R, "Biomechanics in clinical orthodontics", pp.188~217 (1997), Saunders
- Pizzoni L, "Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets", Eur J Orthod, 20, pp.283~291 (1998)
- Rinchuse DJ, "Self-ligating brackets : present and future", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132, pp.216~222 (2007)
- Bednar JR, "The influence of bracket design on moment production during axial rotation", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 104, pp.254~261 (1993)
- Thorstenson GA, "Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 122, pp.295~305 (2002)
- Thorstenson GA, "Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 121, pp.472~482 (2002)
- Jiang R, "Physiologic Anchorage control: a new orthodontic concept and its clinical application", pp.103~120 (2017), Springer
- Bednar JR, "A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 100, pp.513~522 (1991)
- Suryawanshi GR, "In vitro evaluation of different methods of ligation on friction in sliding mechanics", Orthodontics (Chic.), 14, pp.e102~e109 (2013)
- Hain M, "The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 123, pp.416~422 (2003)
- Yeh CL, "In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance between brackets with passive-ligation designs", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131, pp.704.e11~704.e22 (2007)
- Pesce RE, "Evaluation of rotational control and forces generated during first-order archwire deflections: a comparison of self-ligating and conventional brackets", Eur J Orthod, 36, pp.245~254 (2014)
- O'Reilly D, "An ex-vivo investigation into the effect of bracket displacement on the resistance to sliding", Br J Orthod, 26, pp.219~227 (1999)
- Kusy RP, "Ongoing innovations in biomechanics and materials for the new millennium", Angle Orthod, 70, pp.366~376 (2000)