Comparison of frictional forces between aesthetic orthodontic coated wires and self-ligation brackets
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of polymer- and rhodium-coated wires compared to uncoated wires by measuring the frictional forces using self-ligation brackets. Methods: 0.016-inch nickel titanium (NiTi) wires and 0.017 × 0.025-inch stainless steel (SS) wires were used, and the angulations between the brackets and wires were set to 0o, 5o, and 10°. Upper maxillary premolar brackets (Clippy-C®) with a 0.022-inch slot were selected for the study and a tensile test was performed with a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The maximum static frictional forces and kinetic frictional forces were recorded and compared. Results: The maximum static frictional forces and the kinetic frictional forces of coated wires were equal to or higher than those of the uncoated wires (p < 0.05). The maximum static frictional forces of rhodium-coated wires were significantly higher than those of polymer-coated wires when the angulations between the brackets and wires were set to (i) 5o in the 0.016-inch NiTi wires and (ii) all angulations in the 0.017 × 0.025-inch SS wires (p < 0.05). The kinetic frictional forces of rhodium-coated wires were higher than those of polymer-coated wires, except when the angulations were set to 0o in the 0.016-inch NiTi wires (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although the frictional forces of the coated wires with regards to aesthetics were equal to or greater than those of the uncoated wires, a study under similar conditions regarding the oral cavity is needed in order to establish the clinical implications.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of polymer- and rhodium-coated wires compared to uncoated wires by measuring the frictional forces using self-ligation brackets. Methods: 0.016-inch nickel titanium (NiTi) wires and 0.017 × 0.025-inch stainless steel (SS) wires were used, and the angulations between the brackets and wires were set to 0o, 5o, and 10°. Upper maxillary premolar brackets (Clippy-C®) with a 0.022-inch slot were selected for the study and a tensile test was performed with a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The maximum static frictional forces and kinetic frictional forces were recorded and compared. Results: The maximum static frictional forces and the kinetic frictional forces of coated wires were equal to or higher than those of the uncoated wires (p < 0.05). The maximum static frictional forces of rhodium-coated wires were significantly higher than those of polymer-coated wires when the angulations between the brackets and wires were set to (i) 5o in the 0.016-inch NiTi wires and (ii) all angulations in the 0.017 × 0.025-inch SS wires (p < 0.05). The kinetic frictional forces of rhodium-coated wires were higher than those of polymer-coated wires, except when the angulations were set to 0o in the 0.016-inch NiTi wires (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although the frictional forces of the coated wires with regards to aesthetics were equal to or greater than those of the uncoated wires, a study under similar conditions regarding the oral cavity is needed in order to establish the clinical implications.
참고문헌 (13)
- Burrow SJ, "Friction and resistance to sliding in orthodontics: a critical review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 135, pp.442~447 (2009)
- Kusy RP, "Friction between different wire-bracket configurations and materials", Semin Orthod, 3, pp.166~177 (1997)
- Neumann P, "Corrosion and permanent fracture resistance of coated and conventional orthodontic wires", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 13, pp.141~147 (2002)
- Elayyan F, "Ex vivo surface and mechanical properties of coated orthodontic archwires", Eur J Orthod, 30, pp.661~667 (2008)
- Elayyan F, "Mechanical properties of coated superelastic archwires in conventional and self-ligating orthodontic brackets", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.213~217 (2010)
- Bandeira AM, "Influence of thermal or chemical degradation on the frictional force of an experimental coated NiTi wire", Angle Orthod, 81, pp.484~489 (2011)
- 장태호, "교정용 브라켓의 종류와 각도, 호선의 코팅 여부에 따른 마찰력의 비교", 대한치과교정학회지, 41(6), pp.399~410 (2011), 대한치과교정학회
- Drescher D, "Frictional forces between bracket and arch wire", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 96, pp.397~404 (1989)
- Frank CA, "A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire", Am J Orthod, 78, pp.593~609 (1980)
- Kusy RP, "Coefficients of friction for arch wires in stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina bracket slots. I. The dry state", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 98, pp.300~312 (1990)
- Tselepis M, "The dynamic frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and arch wires", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 106, pp.131~138 (1994)
- Iijima M, "Effect of coating on properties of esthetic orthodontic nickel-titanium wires", Angle Orthod, 82, pp.319~325 (2012)
- Kusy RP, "Influence of archwire and bracket dimensions on sliding mechanics: derivations and determinations of the critical contact angles for binding", Eur J Orthod, 21, pp.199~208 (1999)