본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Accuracy of Bolton analysis measured in laser scanned digital models compared with plaster models (gold standard) and cone-beam computer tomography images

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of Bolton analysis obtained from digital models scanned with the Ortho Insight three-dimensional (3D) laser scanner system to those obtained from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and traditional plaster models. Methods: CBCT scans and plaster models were obtained from 50 patients. Plaster models were scanned using the Ortho Insight 3D laser scanner; Bolton ratios were calculated with its software. CBCT scans were imported and analyzed using AVIZO software. Plaster models were measured with a digital caliper. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Anterior and overall Bolton ratios obtained by the three different modalities exhibited excellent agreement (> 0.970). The mean differences between the scanned digital models and physical models and between the CBCT images and scanned digital models for overall Bolton ratios were 0.41 ± 0.305% and 0.45 ± 0.456%, respectively; for anterior Bolton ratios, 0.59 ± 0.520% and 1.01 ± 0.780%, respectively. ICC results showed that intraexaminer error reliability was generally excellent (> 0.858 for all three diagnostic modalities), with < 1.45% discrepancy in the Bolton analysis. Conclusions: Laser scanned digital models are highly accurate compared to physical models and CBCT scans for assessing the spatial relationships of dental arches for orthodontic diagnosis.[Korean J Orthod 2016;46(1):13-19]

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of Bolton analysis obtained from digital models scanned with the Ortho Insight three-dimensional (3D) laser scanner system to those obtained from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and traditional plaster models. Methods: CBCT scans and plaster models were obtained from 50 patients. Plaster models were scanned using the Ortho Insight 3D laser scanner; Bolton ratios were calculated with its software. CBCT scans were imported and analyzed using AVIZO software. Plaster models were measured with a digital caliper. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Anterior and overall Bolton ratios obtained by the three different modalities exhibited excellent agreement (> 0.970). The mean differences between the scanned digital models and physical models and between the CBCT images and scanned digital models for overall Bolton ratios were 0.41 ± 0.305% and 0.45 ± 0.456%, respectively; for anterior Bolton ratios, 0.59 ± 0.520% and 1.01 ± 0.780%, respectively. ICC results showed that intraexaminer error reliability was generally excellent (> 0.858 for all three diagnostic modalities), with < 1.45% discrepancy in the Bolton analysis. Conclusions: Laser scanned digital models are highly accurate compared to physical models and CBCT scans for assessing the spatial relationships of dental arches for orthodontic diagnosis.[Korean J Orthod 2016;46(1):13-19]

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Wedrychowska-Szulc B, "Overall and anterior Bolton ratio in Class I, II, and III orthodontic patients", Eur J Orthod, 32, pp.313~318 (2010)
  2. Bolton WA, "Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion", Angle Orthod, 28, pp.113~130 (1958)
  3. Bolton WA, "The clinical use of a tooth size analysis", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 48, pp.504~529 (1962)
  4. Othman SA, "Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton's ratios: a literature review", J Orthod, 33, pp.45~51 (2006)
  5. Sousa MV, "Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 142, pp.269~273 (2012)
  6. Quimby ML, "The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models", Angle Orthod, 74, pp.298~303 (2004)
  7. Mah JK, "Practical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics", J Am Dent Assoc, 141(Suppl 3), pp.7S~13S (2010)
  8. Lagravère MO, "Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.112~116 (2008)
  9. Akyalcin S, "Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144, pp.831~837 (2013)
  10. Flügge TV, "Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144, pp.471~478 (2013)
  11. El-Zanaty HM, "Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.259~265 (2010)
  12. Kim J, "Accuracy of laserscanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography", Angle Orthod, 84, pp.443~450 (2014)
  13. Whetten JL, "Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, pp.485~491 (2006)
  14. Fleming PS, "Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review", Orthod Craniofac Res, 14, pp.1~16 (2011)
  15. Naidu D, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144, pp.304~310 (2013)
  16. Wiranto MG, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 143, pp.140~147 (2013)
  17. Proffit WR, "Contemporary orthodontics", pp.170~ (2000), Mosby
  18. Roberts CT, "The design and analysis of reliability studies for the use of epidemiological and audit indices in orthodontics", Br J Orthod, 24, pp.139~147 (1997)
  19. Shellhart WC, "Reliability of the Bolton tooth-size analysis when applied to crowded dentitions", Angle Orthod, 65, pp.327~334 (1995)
  20. Zilberman O, "Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models", Angle Orthod, 73, pp.301~306 (2003)
  21. Nalcaci R, "Comparison of Bolton analysis and tooth size measurements obtained using conventional and three-dimensional orthodontic models", Eur J Dent, 7(Suppl 1), pp.S66~S70 (2013)
  22. Kau CH, "Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little's Index", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.435~439 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

석고 모형, 레이저 스캔 디지털 모형, 콘 빔 CT 영상 간의 모형 분석 계측치 비교임미영, 임성훈대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2009 · 제39권 제1호Accuracy and reliability of measurements performed using two different software programs on digital models generated using laser and computed tomography plaster model scannersAnne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman, Edwin M. Ongkosuwito, E. Willemijn Penning, K. Hero Breuning, Leonardo T. Camardella, Oswaldo V. Vilella대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2020 · 제50권 제1호Accuracy of inter-arch measurements performed on digital models generated using two types of intraoral scanners: Ex vivo study김성훈, 문철현, 유조광, Su-Jung Lee, Yoon-Koo Kang대한치과의사협회 · 대한치과의사협회지2020 · 제58권 제4호Evaluation of accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models in reproducing intermaxillary relational measurements: Based on inter-operator differencesChoi Won-joon, Lee Su-jung, Moon Cheol-Hyun대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2022 · 제52권 제1호디지털 치열 모형에서 악궁 관계 지표 측정의 타당성류지인, 양병은, 이혜림대한소아치과학회 · 대한소아치과학회지2022 · 제49권 제1호In-vitro assessment of the accuracy and reliability of mandibular dental model superimposition based on voxel-based cone-beam computed tomography registrationGaofeng Han, Jing Li, Shuo Wang, Xuedong Wang, Yanheng Zhou, Yan Liu대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2019 · 제49권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)