Accuracy of inter-arch measurements performed on digital models generated using two types of intraoral scanners: Ex vivo study
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the inter-arch relationship of digital models generated using two types of intraoral scanners. Methods: In total, 34 plaster model samples were used. Two corresponding digital models were created using two types of intraoral scanners. A total of 15 variables were measured. The plaster model was directly measured using a digital caliper, while the digital models were measured using a software. The accuracy of the measurements was evaluated using repeated measures analysis of variance and the Friedman test. Results: Among the 15 measurements, 6 measurements[Overjet, Overbite, DZ_11-41 (Distance between the gingival zenith of maxillary right central incisor and mandibular right central incisor), DZ_16-46 (Distance between the gingival zenith of maxillary right first molar and mandibular right first molar), DZ_13-33 (Distance between the gingival zenith of maxillary right canine and mandibular left canine), and DZ_23-43 (Distance between the gingival zenith of maxillary left canine and mandibular right canine)]showed statistically significant differences, with DZ_23-43 showing the largest difference of 0.18 mm. The other measurements showed no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: Regardless of the type of scanner used for preparation, digital models can be used as clinically acceptable alternatives to conventional plaster models.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the inter-arch relationship of digital models generated using two types of intraoral scanners. Methods: In total, 34 plaster model samples were used. Two corresponding digital models were created using two types of intraoral scanners. A total of 15 variables were measured. The plaster model was directly measured using a digital caliper, while the digital models were measured using a software. The accuracy of the measurements was evaluated using repeated measures analysis of variance and the Friedman test. Results: Among the 15 measurements, 6 measurements[Overjet, Overbite, DZ_11-41 (Distance between the gingival zenith of maxillary right central incisor and mandibular right central incisor), DZ_16-46 (Distance between the gingival zenith of maxillary right first molar and mandibular right first molar), DZ_13-33 (Distance between the gingival zenith of maxillary right canine and mandibular left canine), and DZ_23-43 (Distance between the gingival zenith of maxillary left canine and mandibular right canine)]showed statistically significant differences, with DZ_23-43 showing the largest difference of 0.18 mm. The other measurements showed no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: Regardless of the type of scanner used for preparation, digital models can be used as clinically acceptable alternatives to conventional plaster models.
참고문헌 (26)
- Horton HM, "Technique comparison for efficient orthodontic tooth measurements using digital models", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.254~261 (2010)
- Pacheco-Pereira C, "Variation of orthodontic treatment decision-making based on dental model type : A systematic review", Angle Orthod, 85, pp.501~509 (2015)
- Reuschl RP, "Reliability and validity of measurements on digital study models and plaster models", Eur J Orthod, 38, pp.22~26 (2016)
- Sweeney S, "Comparison of 5 types of interocclusal recording materials on the accuracy of articulation of digital models", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 148, pp.245~252 (2015)
- Kihara T, "Accuracy of a three-dimensional dentition model digitized from an interocclusal record using a non-contact surface scanner", Eur J Orthod, 38, pp.435~439 (2016)
- Aragon ML, "Validity and reliability of intraoral scanners compared to conventional gypsum models measurements : a systematic review", Eur J Orthod, 38, pp.429~434 (2016)
- Fleming PS, "Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models : a systematic review", Orthod Craniofac Res, 14, pp.1~16 (2011)
- Kim J, "Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography", Angle Orthod, 84, pp.443~450 (2014)
- Burzynski JA, "Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions : Time and patient satisfaction", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 153, pp.534~541 (2018)
- Grewal B, "Royal London space analysis : plaster versus digital model assessment", Eur J Orthod, 39, pp.320~325 (2017)
- Goracci C, "Accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch impressions: a systematic review of the clinical evidence", Eur J Orthod, 38, pp.422~428 (2016)
- Ji-won Anh, "A comparison of the precision of three-dimensional images acquired by 2 digital intraoral scanners: effects of tooth irregularity and scanning direction", 대한치과교정학회지, 46(1), pp.3~12 (2016), 대한치과교정학회
- Cuperus AM, "Dental models made with an intraoral scanner : a validation study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 142, pp.308~313 (2012)
- Darroudi AM, "Accuracy of a computed tomography scanning procedure to manufacture digital models", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 151, pp.995~1003 (2017)
- Kiviahde H, "Inter-arch digital model vs. manual cast measurements: Accuracy and reliability", Cranio, 36, pp.222~227 (2018)
- Wan Hassan WN, "Assessing agreement in measurements of orthodontic study models : Digital caliper on plaster models vs 3-dimensional software on models scanned by structured-light scanner", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 150, pp.886~895 (2016)
- Mack S, "Accuracy of 3-dimensional curvilinear measurements on digital models with intraoral scanners", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 152, pp.420~425 (2017)
- Yoon JH, "Model Analysis of Digital Models in Moderate to Severe Crowding : In Vivo Validation and Clinical Application", Biomed Res Int, 2018, pp.8414605~ (2018)
- Koretsi V, "Intra-observer reliability and agreement of manual and digital orthodontic model analysis", Eur J Orthod, 40, pp.52~57 (2018)
- Reuschl RP, "Reliability and validity of measurements on digital study models and plaster models", Eur J Orthod, 38, pp.22~26 (2016)
- Dahlberg G, "Statistical methods for medical and biological students" (1940), Interscience Publications
- Bland JM, "Measuring agreement in method comparison studies", Stat Methods Med Res, 8, pp.135~160 (1999)
- Rossini G, "Diagnostic accuracy and measurement sensitivity of digital models for orthodontic purposes : A systematic review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 149, pp.161~170 (2016)
- Porter JL, "Comparison of intraoral and extraoral scanners on the accuracy of digital model articulation", J Orthod, 45, pp.275~282 (2018)
- Kong KA, "Statistical methods : reliability assessment and method comparison", Ewha Med J, 40, pp.9~16 (2017)
- 윤달선, "Clinical application of an intraoral scanner for serial evaluation of orthodontic tooth movement: A preliminary study", 대한치과교정학회지, 48(4), pp.262~267 (2018), 대한치과교정학회