본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Accuracy and reliability of measurements performed using two different software programs on digital models generated using laser and computed tomography plaster model scanners

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and reliability of measurements performed using two different software programs on digital models generated using two types of plaster model scanners (a laser scanner and a computed tomography [CT] scanner). Methods: Thirty plaster models were scanned with a 3Shape laser scanner and with a Flash CT scanner. Two examiners performed measurements on plaster models by using digital calipers and on digital models by using Ortho Analyzer (3Shape) and Digimodel® (OrthoProof) software programs. Forty-two measurements, including tooth diameter, crown height, overjet, overbite, intercanine and intermolar distances, and sagittal relationship, were obtained. Results: Statistically significant differences were not found between the plaster and digital model measurements (ANOVA); however, some discrepancies were clinically relevant. Plaster and digital model measurements made using the two scanning methods showed high intraclass coefficient correlation values and acceptable 95% limits of agreement in the Bland-Altman analysis. The software used did not influence the accuracy of measurements. Conclusions: Digital models generated from plaster casts by using laser and CT scanning and measured using two different software programs are accurate, and the measurements are reliable. Therefore, both fabrication methods and software could be used interchangeably.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and reliability of measurements performed using two different software programs on digital models generated using two types of plaster model scanners (a laser scanner and a computed tomography [CT] scanner). Methods: Thirty plaster models were scanned with a 3Shape laser scanner and with a Flash CT scanner. Two examiners performed measurements on plaster models by using digital calipers and on digital models by using Ortho Analyzer (3Shape) and Digimodel® (OrthoProof) software programs. Forty-two measurements, including tooth diameter, crown height, overjet, overbite, intercanine and intermolar distances, and sagittal relationship, were obtained. Results: Statistically significant differences were not found between the plaster and digital model measurements (ANOVA); however, some discrepancies were clinically relevant. Plaster and digital model measurements made using the two scanning methods showed high intraclass coefficient correlation values and acceptable 95% limits of agreement in the Bland-Altman analysis. The software used did not influence the accuracy of measurements. Conclusions: Digital models generated from plaster casts by using laser and CT scanning and measured using two different software programs are accurate, and the measurements are reliable. Therefore, both fabrication methods and software could be used interchangeably.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Rischen RJ, "Records needed for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning : a systematic review", PLoS One, 8, pp.e74186~ (2013)
  2. Abizadeh N, "Digital versus plaster study models : how accurate and reproducible are they", J Orthod, 39, pp.151~159 (2012)
  3. de Waard O, "Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 146, pp.328~336 (2014)
  4. Torassian G, "Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.474~481 (2010)
  5. White AJ, "Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.456~ (2010)
  6. Ahn HW, "Measurement of three-dimensional perioral soft tissue changes in dentoalveolar protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment using a structured light scanner", Angle Orthod, 84, pp.795~802 (2014)
  7. Grünheid T, "Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 145, pp.157~164 (2014)
  8. Asquith J, "Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models : a pilot study", Eur J Orthod, 29, pp.517~522 (2007)
  9. Stevens DR, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, pp.794~803 (2006)
  10. Mullen SR, "Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 132, pp.346~352 (2007)
  11. Horton HM, "Technique comparison for efficient orthodontic tooth measurements using digital models", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.254~261 (2010)
  12. Goonewardene RW, "Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models", Aust Orthod J, 24, pp.83~90 (2008)
  13. Sousa MV, "Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 142, pp.269~273 (2012)
  14. Costalos PA, "Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 128, pp.624~629 (2005)
  15. Keating AP, "A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy", J Orthod, 35, pp.191~201 (2008)
  16. Kim J, "Accuracy of laserscanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography", Angle Orthod, 84, pp.443~450 (2014)
  17. Okunami TR, "Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system : digital vs plaster dental casts", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131, pp.51~56 (2007)
  18. Bootvong K, "Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis : reliability and validity", Eur J Orthod, 32, pp.589~595 (2010)
  19. Tomassetti JJ, "A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton toothsize analyses with a commonly used method", Angle Orthod, 71, pp.351~357 (2001)
  20. Hayashi K, "Assessment of the accuracy and reliability of new 3-dimensional scanning devices", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144, pp.619~625 (2013)
  21. Creed B, "A comparison of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained from cone beam computerized tomography images and digital models", Semin Orthod, 17, pp.49~56 (2011)
  22. Hildebrand JC, "Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133, pp.283~289 (2008)
  23. Santoro M, "Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.101~105 (2003)
  24. De Luca Canto G, "Intra-arch dimensional measurement validity of laser-scanned digital dental models compared with the original plaster models : a systematic review", Orthod Craniofac Res, 18, pp.65~76 (2015)
  25. Watanabe-Kanno GA, "Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models", Braz Oral Res, 23, pp.288~295 (2009)
  26. Veenema AC, "Index of complexity, outcome and need scored on plaster and digital models", Eur J Orthod, 31, pp.281~286 (2009)
  27. Wan Hassan WN, "Assessing agreement in measurements of orthodontic study models : digital caliper on plaster models vs 3-dimensional software on models scanned by structured-light scanner", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 150, pp.886~895 (2016)
  28. Westerlund A, "Digital casts in orthodontics : a comparison of 4 software systems", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 147, pp.509~516 (2015)
  29. Pandis N, "Sample calculations for comparison of 2 means", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 141, pp.519~521 (2012)
  30. Naidu D, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144, pp.304~310 (2013)
  31. Fleming PS, "Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models : a systematic review", Orthod Craniofac Res, 14, pp.1~16 (2011)
  32. Wiranto MG, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 143, pp.140~147 (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

Accuracy of inter-arch measurements performed on digital models generated using two types of intraoral scanners: Ex vivo study김성훈, 문철현, 유조광, Su-Jung Lee, Yoon-Koo Kang대한치과의사협회 · 대한치과의사협회지2020 · 제58권 제4호Accuracy of Bolton analysis measured in laser scanned digital models compared with plaster models (gold standard) and cone-beam computer tomography imagesJooseong Kim, Manuel O. Lagravére대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2016 · 제46권 제1호Evaluation of accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models in reproducing intermaxillary relational measurements: Based on inter-operator differencesChoi Won-joon, Lee Su-jung, Moon Cheol-Hyun대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2022 · 제52권 제1호Evaluating Measurements: A Comparative Study of Digital and Plaster Models for Orthodontic Applications in Mixed Dentition김미선, 남옥형, 신서영, 이고은, 이효설, 채용권, 최성철대한소아치과학회 · 대한소아치과학회지2024 · 제51권 제1호석고 모형, 레이저 스캔 디지털 모형, 콘 빔 CT 영상 간의 모형 분석 계측치 비교임미영, 임성훈대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2009 · 제39권 제1호Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique김기백, 김웅철, 김재홍, 김지환, 김혜영대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2014 · 제44권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)