Surface analysis of metal clips of ceramic selfligating brackets
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the surface composition, roughness, and relative friction of metal clips from various ceramic self-ligating brackets. Methods: Six kinds of brackets were examined. The control group (mC) consisted of interactive metal self-ligating brackets while the experimental group (CC, EC, MA, QK, and WA) consisted of interactive ceramic self-ligating brackets. Atomic force microscopy-lateral force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy were used to analyze the surface of each bracket clip. Results: All the clips in the experimental groups were coated with rhodium except for the QK clip. The results showed that the QK clip had the lowest average roughness on the outer surface, followed by the MA, EC, WA, and CC clips. However, the CC clip had the lowest average roughness on the inner surface, followed by the QK, WA, MA, and EC clips. The QK clip also had the lowest relative friction on the outer surface, followed by the MA, EC, CC, and WA clips. Likewise, the CC clip had the lowest relative friction on the inner surface, followed by the QK, WA, MA, and EC clips. Conclusions: The surface roughness and relative friction of the rhodium-coated clips were generally higher than those of the uncoated clips.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the surface composition, roughness, and relative friction of metal clips from various ceramic self-ligating brackets. Methods: Six kinds of brackets were examined. The control group (mC) consisted of interactive metal self-ligating brackets while the experimental group (CC, EC, MA, QK, and WA) consisted of interactive ceramic self-ligating brackets. Atomic force microscopy-lateral force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy were used to analyze the surface of each bracket clip. Results: All the clips in the experimental groups were coated with rhodium except for the QK clip. The results showed that the QK clip had the lowest average roughness on the outer surface, followed by the MA, EC, WA, and CC clips. However, the CC clip had the lowest average roughness on the inner surface, followed by the QK, WA, MA, and EC clips. The QK clip also had the lowest relative friction on the outer surface, followed by the MA, EC, CC, and WA clips. Likewise, the CC clip had the lowest relative friction on the inner surface, followed by the QK, WA, MA, and EC clips. Conclusions: The surface roughness and relative friction of the rhodium-coated clips were generally higher than those of the uncoated clips.
참고문헌 (23)
- Carneiro GK, "Evaluation of stiffness and plastic deformation of active ceramic self-ligating bracket clips after repetitive opening and closure movements", Dental Press J Orthod, 20, pp.45~50 (2015)
- Harradine NW, "Self-ligating brackets : where are we now", J Orthod, 30, pp.262~273 (2003)
- Buljan ZI, "In vitro oxidative stress induced by conventional and self-ligating brackets", Angle Orthod, 82, pp.340~345 (2012)
- Albuquerque CG, "Deflection flexural strength effects roughness aesthetic-coated orthodontic wires", Braz Dent J, 28, pp.40~45 (2017)
- Ricardo Lima SHINTCOVSK, "Comparison surface characteristics and chemical composition of conventional metallic and Nickel-Free brackets", Brazilian Oral Research, 29(1) (2015), FapUNIFESP (SciELO)[DOI]
- Varma DP, "Comparison of galvanic corrosion potential of metal injection molded brackets to that of conventional metal brackets with nickel-titanium and copper nickel-titanium archwire combinations", J Contemp Dent Pract, 14, pp.488~495 (2013)
- Gkantidis N, "Comparative assessment of clinical performance of esthetic bracket materials", Angle Orthod, 82, pp.691~697 (2012)
- Pratten DH, "Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 98, pp.398~403 (1990)
- Bednar JR, "A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 100, pp.513~522 (1991)
- Saunders CR, "Surface topography and frictional characteristics of ceramic brackets", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 106, pp.76~87 (1994)
- Zinelis S, "Comparative assessment of the roughness, hardness, and wear resistance of aesthetic bracket materials", Dent Mater, 21, pp.890~894 (2005)
- Lee GJ, "A quantitative AFM analysis of nano-scale surface roughness in various orthodontic brackets", Micron, 41, pp.775~782 (2010)
- Choi S, "Ultrastructural effect of self-ligating bracket materials on stainless steel and superelastic NiTi wire sur faces", Microsc Res Tech, 75, pp.1076~1083 (2012)
- 박기호, "원자현미경을 이용한 세라믹 브라켓 슬롯의 표면조도에 대한 연구", 대한치과교정학회지, 40(5), pp.294~303 (2010), 대한치과교정학회
- Choi S, "Correlation between frictional force and surface roughness of orthodontic archwires", Scanning, 37, pp.399~405 (2015)
- Rudge P, "A comparison of roughness parameters and friction coefficients of aesthetic archwires", Eur J Orthod, 37, pp.49~55 (2015)
- Misra R, "Nanoscale reduction in surface friction of polymer surfaces modified with Sc3 hydrophobin from Schizophyllum commune", Biomacromolecules, 7, pp.1463~1470 (2006)
- Nanjundan K, "Evaluation of frictional resistance and surface characteristics after immersion of orthodontic brackets and wire in different chemical solutions : a comparative in vitrostudy", Indian J Dent Res, 27, pp.513~520 (2016)
- Proffit WR, "Contemporary orthodontics", pp.370~372 (2013), Mosby
- Kusy RP, "Morphology of polycrystalline alumina brackets and its relationship to fracture toughness and strength", Angle Orthod, 58, pp.197~203 (1988)
- Angolkar PV, "Evaluation of friction between ceramic brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 98, pp.499~506 (1990)
- Choi SH, "Surface roughness of three types of modern plastic bracket slot floors and frictional resistance", Angle Orthod, 84, pp.177~183 (2014)
- Choi S, "Changes in ultrastructure and properties of bracket slots after orthodontic treatment with bicuspid extraction", Scanning, 33, pp.25~32 (2011)