A reliable method for evaluating upper molar distalization: Superimposition of three-dimensional digital models
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of measurements obtained after the superimposition of three-dimensional (3D) digital models by comparing them with those obtained from lateral cephalometric radiographs and photocopies of plaster models for the evaluation of upper molar distalization. Methods: Data were collected from plaster models and lateral cephalometric radiographs of 20 Class II patients whose maxillary first molars were distalized with an intraoral distalizer. The posterior movements of the maxillary first molars were evaluated using lateral cephalometric radiographs (group CP), photocopies of plaster models (group PH), and digitized 3D models (group TD). Additionally, distalization and expansion of the other teeth and the degrees of molar rotation were measured in group PH and group TD and compared between the two groups. Results: No significant difference was observed regarding the amount of molar distalization among the three groups. A comparison of the aforementioned parameters between group PH and group TD did not reveal any significant difference. Conclusions: 3D digital models are reliable to assess the results of upper molar distalization and can be considered a valid alternative to conventional measurement methods. [Korean J Orthod 2015;45(2):82-88]
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of measurements obtained after the superimposition of three-dimensional (3D) digital models by comparing them with those obtained from lateral cephalometric radiographs and photocopies of plaster models for the evaluation of upper molar distalization. Methods: Data were collected from plaster models and lateral cephalometric radiographs of 20 Class II patients whose maxillary first molars were distalized with an intraoral distalizer. The posterior movements of the maxillary first molars were evaluated using lateral cephalometric radiographs (group CP), photocopies of plaster models (group PH), and digitized 3D models (group TD). Additionally, distalization and expansion of the other teeth and the degrees of molar rotation were measured in group PH and group TD and compared between the two groups. Results: No significant difference was observed regarding the amount of molar distalization among the three groups. A comparison of the aforementioned parameters between group PH and group TD did not reveal any significant difference. Conclusions: 3D digital models are reliable to assess the results of upper molar distalization and can be considered a valid alternative to conventional measurement methods. [Korean J Orthod 2015;45(2):82-88]
참고문헌 (30)
- Leifert MF, "Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, pp.16~ (2009)
- Quimby ML, "The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models", Angle Orthod, 74, pp.298~303 (2004)
- Stevens DR, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, pp.794~803 (2006)
- Horton HM, "Technique comparison for efficient orthodontic tooth measurements using digital models", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.254~261 (2010)
- Fleming PS, "Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review", Orthod Craniofac Res, 14, pp.1~16 (2011)
- Sjögren AP, "Orthodontic study cast analysis--reproducibility of recordings and agreement between conventional and 3D virtual measurements", J Digit Imaging, 23, pp.482~492 (2010)
- Zilberman O, "Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models", Angle Orthod, 73, pp.301~306 (2003)
- Santoro M, "Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.101~105 (2003)
- Gracco A, "Digital and plaster models: a comparison of measurements and times", Prog Orthod, 8, pp.252~259 (2007)
- Ruhi Nalçaci, "Noncompliance screw supported maxillary molar distalization in a parallel manner", 대한치과교정학회지, 40(4), pp.250~259 (2010), 대한치과교정학회
- 김수진, "간접골성 고정원을 이용한 상악 구치부 원심이동 장치 종류에 따른 치아 이동 양상 평가", 대한치과교정학회지, 38(6), pp.376~387 (2008), 대한치과교정학회
- Ashmore JL, "A 3-dimensional analysis of molar movement during headgear treatment", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 121, pp.18~29 (2002)
- Björk A, "Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years", Eur J Orthod, 5, pp.1~46 (1983)
- Champagne M, "Reliability of measurements from photocopies of study models", J Clin Orthod, 26, pp.648~650 (1992)
- Jang I, "A novel method for the assessment of three-dimensional tooth movement during orthodontic treatment", Angle Orthod, 79, pp.447~453 (2009)
- Lai EH, "Threedimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.636~645 (2008)
- Cha BK, "Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology", Eur J Orthod, 29, pp.325~331 (2007)
- McGuinness NJ, "Storage of orthodontic study models in hospital units in the U.K", Br J Orthod, 19, pp.227~232 (1992)
- Thiruvenkatachari B, "Measuring 3-dimensional tooth movement with a 3-dimensional surface laser scanner", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 135, pp.480~485 (2009)
- Kuroda T, "Three-dimensional dental cast analyzing system using laser scanning", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 110, pp.365~369 (1996)
- Hajeer MY, "Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: part I", J Orthod, 31, pp.62~70 (2004)
- Mavropoulos A, "Efficiency of noncompliance simultaneous first and second upper molar distalization:a three-dimensional tooth movement analysis", Angle Orthod, 75, pp.532~539 (2005)
- Bell A, "Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models", J Orthod, 30, pp.219~223 (2003)
- Keating AP, "A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy", J Orthod, 35, pp.191~201 (2008)
- Proffit WR, "Contemporary orthodontics", pp.167~233 (2007), Mosby Elsevier
- 최진일, "Validity of palatal superimposition of 3-dimensional digital models in cases treated with rapid maxillary expansion and maxillary protraction headgear", 대한치과교정학회지, 42(5), pp.235~241 (2012), 대한치과교정학회
- Bailey LT, "Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts in extraction and nonextraction cases", Angle Orthod, 66, pp.73~78 (1996)
- Hoggan BR, "The use of palatal rugae for the assessment of anteroposterior tooth movements", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 119, pp.482~488 (2001)
- Simmons JD, "A longitudinal study of anteroposterior growth changes in the palatine rugae", J Dent Res, 66, pp.1512~1515 (1987)
- Choi DS, "Accuracy and reliability of palatal superimposition of three-dimensional digital models", Angle Orthod, 80, pp.497~503 (2010)