Noncompliance screw supported maxillary molar distalization in a parallel manner
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: Intraoral noncompliance upper molar distalization techniques have gained in popularity and have subsequently found to be successful in Class II correction. The aim of the present study was to introduce a screw supported intraoral distalization appliance and investigate its efficiency. Methods: Twenty-one subjects (11 females, 10 males; average age of 14.9 years) with Angle Class II malocclusion participated in this study. Two screws were inserted behind the incisive foramen and immediately loaded to distalize the upper first molars. An intraoral screw supported distalization appliance was used to distalize the upper molars in order to achieve a Class I molar relationship. Skeletal and dental changes were evaluated using cephalometric and three-dimensional (3D) model analysis. Results: Upper molars were distalized 3.95 mm on average and a Class I molar relationship was achieved without any anchorage loss. The upper molars were tipped only 1.49o and the upper right and left molars were rotated only 0.54o and 0.74o respectively which were statistically non-significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The newly designed screw supported noncompliance distalization appliance was found to be an effective device for achieving bodily molar distalization without any anchorage loss. (Korean J Orthod 2010;40(4):250-259)
Abstract
Objective: Intraoral noncompliance upper molar distalization techniques have gained in popularity and have subsequently found to be successful in Class II correction. The aim of the present study was to introduce a screw supported intraoral distalization appliance and investigate its efficiency. Methods: Twenty-one subjects (11 females, 10 males; average age of 14.9 years) with Angle Class II malocclusion participated in this study. Two screws were inserted behind the incisive foramen and immediately loaded to distalize the upper first molars. An intraoral screw supported distalization appliance was used to distalize the upper molars in order to achieve a Class I molar relationship. Skeletal and dental changes were evaluated using cephalometric and three-dimensional (3D) model analysis. Results: Upper molars were distalized 3.95 mm on average and a Class I molar relationship was achieved without any anchorage loss. The upper molars were tipped only 1.49o and the upper right and left molars were rotated only 0.54o and 0.74o respectively which were statistically non-significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The newly designed screw supported noncompliance distalization appliance was found to be an effective device for achieving bodily molar distalization without any anchorage loss. (Korean J Orthod 2010;40(4):250-259)
참고문헌 (39)
- Kircelli BH, "Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance", Angle Orthod, 76, pp.650~9 (2006)
- Papadopoulos MA, "Orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion with miniscrew implants", Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 134, pp.e1~16 (2008)
- Gulati S, "Dental and skeletal changes after intraoral molar distalization with sectional jig assembly", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 114, pp.319~27 (1998)
- Gelgör IE, "Intraosseous screw-supported upper molar distalization", Angle Orthod, 74, pp.838~50 (2004)
- Angelieri F, "Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, pp.520~7 (2006)
- Keles A, "A new approach in maxillary molar distalization: intraoral bodily molar distalizer", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 117, pp.39~48 (2000)
- Keles A, "Bodily distalization of molars with absolute anchorage", Angle Orthod, 73, pp.471~82 (2003)
- Bolla E, "Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods", Angle Orthod, 72, pp.481~94 (2002)
- Escobar SA, "Distalization of maxillary molars with the bone-supported pendulum: a clinical study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131, pp.545~9 (2007)
- Chiu PP, "A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 128, pp.353~65 (2005)
- Doruk C, "The role of the headgear timer in extraoral co-operation", Eur J Orthod, 26, pp.289~91 (2004)
- Ağar U, "The role of psycho-social factors in headgear compliance", Eur J Orthod, 27, pp.263~7 (2005)
- Locatelli R, "Molar distalization with superelastic NiTi wire", J Clin Orthod, 26, pp.277~9 (1992)
- Wilson WL, "Multi-directional 3D functional Class II treatment", J Clin Orthod, 21, pp.186~9 (1987)
- Hilgers JJ, "The pendulum appliance for Class II non-compliance therapy", J Clin Orthod, 26, pp.706~14 (1992)
- Ghosh J, "Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 110, pp.639~46 (1996)
- Byloff FK, "Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 1: Clinical and radiological evaluation", Angle Orthod, 67, pp.249~60 (1997)
- Kinzinger GS, "Efficiency of a pendulum appliance for molar distalization related to second and third molar eruption stage", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 125, pp.8~23 (2004)
- Jones RD, "Rapid Class II molar correction with an open coil jig", J Clin Orthod, 26, pp.661~4 (1992)
- Runge ME, "Analysis of rapid maxillary molar distal movement without patient cooperation", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 115, pp.153~7 (1999)
- Carano A, "The distal jet for upper molar distalization", J Clin Orthod, 30, pp.374~80 (1996)
- Ngantung V, "Posttreatment evaluation of the distal jet appliance", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 120, pp.178~85 (2001)
- Keles A, "Maxillary unilateral molar distalization with sliding mechanics: a preliminary investigation", Eur J Orthod, 23, pp.507~15 (2001)
- Keles A, "Bilateral maxillary molar distalization with sliding mechanics: Keles slider", World J Orthod, 3, pp.57~66 (2002)
- Björk A, "Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years", Eur J Orthod, 5, pp.1~46 (1983)
- Dahlberg G, "Statistical methods for medical and biological students", pp.9~232 (1948), Allen and Unwin, Ltd
- Turley PK, "Orthodontic force application to titanium endosseous implants", Angle Orthod, 58, pp.151~62 (1988)
- Roberts WE, "Rigid endosseous implants for orthodontic and orthopedic anchorage", Angle Orthod, 59, pp.247~56 (1989)
- Linder-Aronson S, "Titanium implant anchorage in orthodontic treatment: an experimental investigation in monkeys", Eur J Orthod, 12, pp.414~9 (1990)
- Smalley WM, "Osseointegrated titanium implants for maxillofacial protraction in monkeys", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 94, pp.285~95 (1988)
- Kinzinger GS, "Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for noncompliance maxillary molar distalization", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, pp.578~86 (2009)
- Bondemark L, "Repelling magnets versus superelastic nickel-titanium coils in the simultaneous distal movement of maxillary first and second molars", Angle Orthod, 64, pp.189~98 (1994)
- Worms FW, "A concept and classifications of centers of rotation and extraoral force systems", Angle Orthod, 43, pp.384~401 (1973)
- Gianelly AA, "The use of magnets to move molars distally", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 96, pp.161~7 (1989)
- Gianelly AA, "Distal movement of the maxillary molars", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 114, pp.66~72 (1998)
- Ten Hoeve A, "Palatal bar and lip bumper in nonextraction treatment", J Clin Orthod, 19, pp.272~91 (1985)
- Jeckel N, "Molar distalization by intra-oral force application", Eur J Orthod, 3, pp.43~6 (1991)
- Smith DI, "The eruption of third molars following extraction of second molars", Dental Pract, 8, pp.292~4 (1958)
- Staggers JA, "A comparison of results of second molar and first premolar extraction treatment", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 98, pp.430~6 (1990)
