본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A comparison of the precision of three-dimensional images acquired by 2 digital intraoral scanners: effects of tooth irregularity and scanning direction

1

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the precision of three-dimensional (3D) images acquired using iTero® (Align Technology Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) and Trios® (3Shape Dental Systems, Copenhagen, Denmark) digital intraoral scanners, and to evaluate the effects of the severity of tooth irregularities and scanning sequence on precision. Methods: Dental arch models were fabricated with differing degrees of tooth irregularity and divided into 2 groups based on scanning sequence. To assess their precision, images were superimposed and an optimized superimposition algorithm was employed to measure any 3D deviation. The t-test, paired t-test, and one-way ANOVA were performed (p < 0.05) for statistical analysis. Results: The iTero® and Trios® systems showed no statistically significant difference in precision among models with differing degrees of tooth irregularity. However, there were statistically significant differences in the precision of the 2 scanners when the starting points of scanning were different. The iTero® scanner (mean deviation, 29.84 ± 12.08 mm) proved to be less precise than the Trios® scanner (22.17 ± 4.47 mm). Conclusions: The precision of 3D images differed according to the degree of tooth irregularity, scanning sequence, and scanner type. However, from a clinical standpoint, both scanners were highly accurate regardless of the degree of tooth irregularity.[Korean J Orthod 2016;46(1):3-12]

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the precision of three-dimensional (3D) images acquired using iTero® (Align Technology Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) and Trios® (3Shape Dental Systems, Copenhagen, Denmark) digital intraoral scanners, and to evaluate the effects of the severity of tooth irregularities and scanning sequence on precision. Methods: Dental arch models were fabricated with differing degrees of tooth irregularity and divided into 2 groups based on scanning sequence. To assess their precision, images were superimposed and an optimized superimposition algorithm was employed to measure any 3D deviation. The t-test, paired t-test, and one-way ANOVA were performed (p < 0.05) for statistical analysis. Results: The iTero® and Trios® systems showed no statistically significant difference in precision among models with differing degrees of tooth irregularity. However, there were statistically significant differences in the precision of the 2 scanners when the starting points of scanning were different. The iTero® scanner (mean deviation, 29.84 ± 12.08 mm) proved to be less precise than the Trios® scanner (22.17 ± 4.47 mm). Conclusions: The precision of 3D images differed according to the degree of tooth irregularity, scanning sequence, and scanner type. However, from a clinical standpoint, both scanners were highly accurate regardless of the degree of tooth irregularity.[Korean J Orthod 2016;46(1):3-12]

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Mah J, "Current status and future needs in craniofacial imaging", Orthod Craniofac Res, 6(Suppl 1), pp.10~16 (2003)
  2. White AJ, "Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.456.e1~456.e9 (2010)
  3. Chandran DT, "Two- and three-dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials: effects of storage time and moisture contamination", Biomed Mater Eng, 20, pp.243~249 (2010)
  4. Al Mortadi N, "CAD", CAM, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, pp.2012, 142[DOI]
  5. Beuer F, "Digital dentistry:an overview of recent developments for CAD", CAM generated restorations, 2008, pp.204, 505~511
  6. Cha BK, "Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology", Eur J Orthod, 29, pp.325~331 (2007)
  7. Hajeer MY, "Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: part II", J Orthod, 31, pp.154~162 (2004)
  8. Patel N, "Integrating three-dimensional digital technologies for comprehensive implant dentistry", J Am Dent Assoc, 141(Suppl 2), pp.20S~24S (2010)
  9. Xiao-Juan Zhang, "Integrated three-dimensional digital assessment of accuracy of anterior tooth movement using clear aligners", 대한치과교정학회지, 45(6), pp.275~281 (2015), 대한치과교정학회
  10. Watanabe-Kanno GA, "Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models", Braz Oral Res, 23, pp.288~295 (2009)
  11. Yourtee D, "Stereolithographic models of biopolymers", J Mol Graph Model, 18, pp.26~60 (2000)
  12. Normung DDIf, "Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 1: General principles and definitions (ISO 5725-1:1994)", Beuth Verlag GmbH, ~ (1997)
  13. Ender A, "Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision", J Prosthet Dent, 109, pp.121~128 (2013)
  14. Flügge TV, "Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144, pp.471~478 (2013)
  15. Wiranto MG, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 143, pp.140~147 (2013)
  16. Naidu D, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144, pp.304~310 (2013)
  17. Patzelt SB, "Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners", Clin Oral Investig, 18, pp.1687~1694 (2014)
  18. Persson AS, "Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness", Dent Mater, 25, pp.929~936 (2009)
  19. Mehl A, "Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera", Int J Comput Dent, 12, pp.11~28 (2009)
  20. Logozzo S, "Recent advances in dental optics-Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry", Opt Laser Eng, 54, pp.203~221 (2014)
  21. Kusnoto B, "Reliability of a 3D surface laser scanner for orthodontic applications", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 122, pp.342~348 (2002)
  22. Ender A, "Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions--an in-vitro study", Int J Comput Dent, 14, pp.11~21 (2011)
  23. Ender A, "Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems", Int J Comput Dent, 16, pp.11~21 (2013)
  24. DeLong R, "Factors influencing optical 3D scanning of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials", J Prosthodont, 10, pp.78~85 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

교정용 브라켓과 호선이 구강 내 스캔 영상의 정확성에 미치는 영향: 예비연구노수지, 임원희대한치과의사협회 · 대한치과의사협회지2025 · 제63권 제3호A new method to measure the accuracy of intraoral scanners along the complete dental arch: A pilot studyEneko Solaberrieta, Erlantz Lizundia, Mikel Iturrate, Xabier Amezua대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2019 · 제11권 제6호Accuracy of inter-arch measurements performed on digital models generated using two types of intraoral scanners: Ex vivo study김성훈, 문철현, 유조광, Su-Jung Lee, Yoon-Koo Kang대한치과의사협회 · 대한치과의사협회지2020 · 제58권 제4호Full-arch accuracy of five intraoral scanners: In vivo analysis of trueness and precisionDong-Wook Kim, Minho Chang, Miran Kwon, MyungSu Kim, Yoon-Ji Kim, Youngmok Cho대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2021 · 제51권 제2호Comparative analysis on reproducibility among 5 intraoral scanners: sectional analysis according to restoration type and preparation outline form박지만대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2016 · 제8권 제5호Impact of scanning strategy on the accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans: a preliminary study on segmental scans and merge methods김소연, 이규복, 이근우, 이두형, 이재목, 이청희, 마이항나, Hai Yen Mai대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2022 · 제14권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)