Impact of scanning strategy on the accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans: a preliminary study on segmental scans and merge methods
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. This study investigated the accuracy of full-arch intraoral scans obtained by various scan strategies with the segmental scan and merge methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seventy intraoral scans (seven scans per group) were performed using 10 scan strategies that differed in the segmental scan (1, 2, or 3 segments) and the scanning motion (straight, zigzag, or combined). The three-dimensional (3D) geometric accuracy of scan images was evaluated by comparison with a reference image in an image analysis software program, in terms of the arch shape discrepancies. Measurement parameters were the intermolar distance, interpremolar distance, anteroposterior distance, and global surface deviation. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significance difference post hoc tests were carried out to compare differences among the scan strategy groups (α = .05). RESULTS. The linear discrepancy values of intraoral scans were not different among scan strategies performed with the single scan and segmental scan methods. In general, differences in the scan motion did not show different accuracies, except for the intermolar distance measured under the scan conditions of a 3-segmental scan and zigzag motion. The global surface deviations were not different among all scan strategies. CONCLUSION. The segmental scan and merge methods using two scan parts appear to be reliable as an alternative to the single scan method for full-arch intraoral scans. When three segmental scans are involved, the accuracy of complete arch scan can be negatively affected.
Abstract
PURPOSE. This study investigated the accuracy of full-arch intraoral scans obtained by various scan strategies with the segmental scan and merge methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seventy intraoral scans (seven scans per group) were performed using 10 scan strategies that differed in the segmental scan (1, 2, or 3 segments) and the scanning motion (straight, zigzag, or combined). The three-dimensional (3D) geometric accuracy of scan images was evaluated by comparison with a reference image in an image analysis software program, in terms of the arch shape discrepancies. Measurement parameters were the intermolar distance, interpremolar distance, anteroposterior distance, and global surface deviation. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significance difference post hoc tests were carried out to compare differences among the scan strategy groups (α = .05). RESULTS. The linear discrepancy values of intraoral scans were not different among scan strategies performed with the single scan and segmental scan methods. In general, differences in the scan motion did not show different accuracies, except for the intermolar distance measured under the scan conditions of a 3-segmental scan and zigzag motion. The global surface deviations were not different among all scan strategies. CONCLUSION. The segmental scan and merge methods using two scan parts appear to be reliable as an alternative to the single scan method for full-arch intraoral scans. When three segmental scans are involved, the accuracy of complete arch scan can be negatively affected.
참고문헌 (26)
- Wulfman C, "Digital scanning for complete-arch implant-supported restorations : A systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 124, pp.161~167 (2020)
- Gjelvold B, "Intraoral digital impression technique compared to conventional impression technique. A randomized clinical trial", J Prosthodont, 25, pp.282~287 (2016)
- Burcu Diker, "Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared teeth and effect of scanning sequence", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 12(5), pp.299~306 (2020), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Nulty AB, "A comparison of full arch trueness and precision of nine intra-oral digital scanners and four lab digital scanners", Dent J(Basel), 9, pp.75~ (2021)
- Ahlholm P, "Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics : a review", J Prosthodont, 27, pp.35~41 (2018)
- Burzynski JA, "Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions : Time and patient satisfaction", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 153, pp.534~541 (2018)
- Abduo J, "Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners : A Systematic Review of Influencing Factors", Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 26, pp.101~121 (2018)
- Mandelli F, "Full-arch intraoral scanning : comparison of two different strategies and their accuracy outcomes", J Osseointegration, 10, pp.65~74 (2018)
- Paratelli A, "Techniques to improve the accuracy of complete-arch implant intraoral digital scans : a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 21, pp.00486~00488 (2021)
- Zimmermann M, "Intraoral scanning systems-a current overview", Int J Comput Dent, 18, pp.101~129 (2015)
- Latham J, "Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners", J Prosthet Dent, 123, pp.85~95 (2020)
- Oh KC, "Effects of scanning strategy and scanner type on the accuracy of intraoral scans : a new approach for assessing the accuracy of scanned data", J Prosthodont, 29, pp.518~523 (2020)
- Passos L, "Impact of different scanning strategies on the accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems in complete-arch impressions : an in vitro study", Int J Comput Dent, 22, pp.307~319 (2019)
- Richert R, "Intraoral scanner technologies : a review to make a successful impression", J Healthc Eng, 2017, pp.8427595~ (2017)
- Medina-Sotomayor P, "Accuracy of four digital scanners according to scanning strategy in complete-arch impressions", PLoS One, 13, pp.e0202916~ (2018)
- Müller P, "Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner", Quintessence Int, 47, pp.343~349 (2016)
- van der Meer WJ, "Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology", PLoS One, 7, pp.e43312~ (2012)
- Zhang YJ, "Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review", Int J Oral Implantol(Berl), 14, pp.157~179 (2021)
- Oliva B, "Three-dimensional analysis of dental arch forms in Italian population", Prog Orthod, 19, pp.34~ (2018)
- Kuhr F, "A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients", J Dent, 55, pp.68~74 (2016)
- Mai HN, "Effects of image and education on the precision of the measurement method for evaluating prosthesis misfit", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.600~605 (2018)
- Hye-Nan Park, "A comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scanners using an intraoral environment simulator", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 10(1), pp.58~64 (2018), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Kurz M, "Influence of material surface on the scanning error of a powder-free 3D measuring system", Clin Oral Investig, 19, pp.2035~2043 (2015)
- Nedelcu RG, "Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners : an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.1461~1471 (2014)
- Pan Y, "Evaluation of laboratory scanner accuracy by a novel calibration block for complete-arch implant rehabilitation", J Dent, 102, pp.103476~ (2020)
- Mandelli F, "Evaluation of the accuracy of extraoral laboratory scanners with a single-tooth abutment model : A 3D analysis", J Prosthodont Res, 61, pp.363~370 (2017)