본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

In -vitro investigation of the mechanical friction properties of a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing lingual bracket system under diverse tooth displacement condition

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the static (SFF) and kinetic frictional forces (KFF) of a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing lingual bracket (CAD/CAM-LB) with those of conventional LB (Con-LB) and Con-LB with narrow bracket width (Con-LB-NBW) under 3 tooth displacement conditions. Methods: The samples were divided into 9 groups according to combinations of 3 LB types (CAD/CAM-LB [Incognito], Con-LB [7th Generation, 7G], and Con-LB-NBW [STb]) with 3 displacement conditions (no displacement [control], maxillary right lateral incisor with 1-mm palatal displacement [MXLI-PD], and maxillary right canine with 1-mm gingival displacement [MXC-GD]; n = 6/group). While drawing a 0.016-inch copper or super-elastic nickel-titanium archwire with 0.5 mm/min for 5 minutes in a chamber maintained at 36.5oC, SFF and KFF were measured. The Kruskal–Wallis method with Bonferroni correction was performed. Results: The Incognito group demonstrated the highest SFF, followed by the 7G and STb groups ([STbcontrol, STb-MXLI-PD, Stb-MXC-GD] < [7G-MXC-GD, 7G-MXLI-PD, 7G-control] < [Incognito-MXLI-PD, Incognito-control, Incognito-MXC-GD]; p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in SFF among the 3 displacement conditions within each bracket group. Within each displacement condition, the Incognito group demonstrated the highest KFF, followed by the 7G and STb groups ([STb-control, STb-MXLI-PD] < Stb-MXC-GD < 7G-MXLI-PD < [7G-control, 7G-MXC-GD] < [7G-MXC-GD, Incognito-MXLI-PD, Incognitocontrol] < [Incognito-control, Incognito-MXC-GD]; p < 0.001). MXC-GD exhibited higher KFFs than MXLI-PD in the same bracket group. Conclusions: The slot design and ligation method of the CAD/CAM-LB system should be modified to reduce SFF and KFF during the leveling/alignment stage.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the static (SFF) and kinetic frictional forces (KFF) of a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing lingual bracket (CAD/CAM-LB) with those of conventional LB (Con-LB) and Con-LB with narrow bracket width (Con-LB-NBW) under 3 tooth displacement conditions. Methods: The samples were divided into 9 groups according to combinations of 3 LB types (CAD/CAM-LB [Incognito], Con-LB [7th Generation, 7G], and Con-LB-NBW [STb]) with 3 displacement conditions (no displacement [control], maxillary right lateral incisor with 1-mm palatal displacement [MXLI-PD], and maxillary right canine with 1-mm gingival displacement [MXC-GD]; n = 6/group). While drawing a 0.016-inch copper or super-elastic nickel-titanium archwire with 0.5 mm/min for 5 minutes in a chamber maintained at 36.5oC, SFF and KFF were measured. The Kruskal–Wallis method with Bonferroni correction was performed. Results: The Incognito group demonstrated the highest SFF, followed by the 7G and STb groups ([STbcontrol, STb-MXLI-PD, Stb-MXC-GD] < [7G-MXC-GD, 7G-MXLI-PD, 7G-control] < [Incognito-MXLI-PD, Incognito-control, Incognito-MXC-GD]; p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in SFF among the 3 displacement conditions within each bracket group. Within each displacement condition, the Incognito group demonstrated the highest KFF, followed by the 7G and STb groups ([STb-control, STb-MXLI-PD] < Stb-MXC-GD < 7G-MXLI-PD < [7G-control, 7G-MXC-GD] < [7G-MXC-GD, Incognito-MXLI-PD, Incognitocontrol] < [Incognito-control, Incognito-MXC-GD]; p < 0.001). MXC-GD exhibited higher KFFs than MXLI-PD in the same bracket group. Conclusions: The slot design and ligation method of the CAD/CAM-LB system should be modified to reduce SFF and KFF during the leveling/alignment stage.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Fujita K., "Multilingual-bracket and mushroom arch wire technique. A clinical report", Am J Orthod, 82, pp.120~140 (1982)
  2. Creekmore T., "Lingual orthodontics--its renaissance", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 96, pp.120~137 (1989)
  3. Slater RD, "Speech and discomfort during lingual orthodontic treatment", J Orthod, 40(Suppl 1), pp.S34~S37 (2013)
  4. Moran KI, "Relative wire stiffness due to lingual versus labial interbracket distance", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 92, pp.24~32 (1987)
  5. Wiechmann D, "Customized brackets and archwires for lingual orthodontic treatment", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, pp.593~599 (2003)
  6. Scuzzo G, "STb light lingual system" (2010), Quintessence
  7. Scuzzo G, "A new lingual straight-wire technique", J Clin Orthod, 44, pp.114~123 (2010)
  8. Lombardo L, "Wire load-deflection characteristics relative to different types of brackets", Int Orthod, 9, pp.120~139 (2011)
  9. Kyung Hee Park, "New classification of lingual arch form in normal occlusion using three dimensional virtual models", 대한치과교정학회지, 45(2), pp.74~81 (2015), 대한치과교정학회
  10. Do-Yoon Kim, "Frictional property comparisons of conventional and self-ligating lingual brackets according to tooth displacement during initial leveling and alignment: an in vitro mechanical study", 대한치과교정학회지, 46(2), pp.87~95 (2016), 대한치과교정학회
  11. Zinelis S, "Microstructural and mechanical characterization of contemporary lingual orthodontic brackets", Eur J Orthod, 36, pp.389~393 (2014)
  12. Eliades T., "Orthodontics:current principles and techniques", pp.1023~1038 (2011), Mosby
  13. Demling A, "Comparative analysis of slot dimension in lingual bracket systems", Head Face Med, 5, pp.27~ (2009)
  14. Lombardo L, "Frictional resistance exerted by different lingual and labial brackets : an in vitro study", Prog Orthod, 14, pp.37~ (2013)
  15. Park JH, "Frictional forces between lingual brackets and archwires measured by a friction tester", Angle Orthod, 74, pp.816~824 (2004)
  16. Ozturk Ortan Y, "A comparative in vitro study of frictional resistance between lingual brackets and stainless steel archwires", Eur J Orthod, 34, pp.119~125 (2012)
  17. Lalithapriya S, "In vitro assessment of competency for different lingual brackets in sliding mechanics", J Orthod Sci, 4, pp.19~25 (2015)
  18. Pereira GO, "Influence of ligation method on friction resistance of lingual brackets with different secondorder angulations : an in vitro study", Dental Press J Orthod, 21, pp.34~40 (2016)
  19. Sifakakis I, "A comparative assessment of forces and moments generated by lingual and conventional brackets", Eur J Orthod, 35, pp.82~86 (2013)
  20. Alobeid A, "Comparison of the force levels among labial and lingual self-ligating and conventional brackets in simulated misaligned teeth", Eur J Orthod, 39, pp.419~425 (2017)
  21. Heo W, "Friction properties according to vertical and horizontal tooth displacement and bracket type during initial leveling and alignment", Angle Orthod, 81, pp.653~661 (2011)
  22. Seo YJ, "Effect of tooth displacement and vibration on frictional force and stick-slip phenomenon in conventional brackets: a preliminary in vitro mechanical analysis", Eur J Orthod, 37, pp.158~163 (2015)
  23. Seo YJ, "Effect of self-ligating bracket type and vibration on frictional force and stick-slip phenomenon in diverse tooth displacement conditions : an in vitro mechanical analysis", Eur J Orthod, 37, pp.474~480 (2015)
  24. Komori A, "KommonBase for precise direct bonding of lingual orthodontic brackets", Int Orthod, 8, pp.14~27 (2010)
  25. Scuzzo G, "A new self-ligation lingual bracket with square slots", J Clin Orthod, 45, pp.682~690 (2011)
  26. Henao SP, "Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts", Angle Orthod, 74, pp.202~211 (2004)
  27. Huntley PN, "A modified over-tie for the ligation of Incognito™ lingual fixed appliances", J Orthod, 40, pp.244~248 (2013)
  28. Kim TK, "Comparison of frictional forces during the initial leveling stage in various combinations of self-ligating brackets and archwires with a custom-designed typodont system", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133, pp.187.e15~187.e24 (2008)
  29. Lai WJ, "A new orthodontic force system for moment control utilizing the flexibility of common wires : evaluation of the effect of contractile force and hook length", J Formos Med Assoc, 117, pp.71~79 (2018)
  30. 윤달선, "Clinical application of an intraoral scanner for serial evaluation of orthodontic tooth movement: A preliminary study", 대한치과교정학회지, 48(4), pp.262~267 (2018), 대한치과교정학회

관련 논문AI추천

Frictional property comparisons of conventional and self-ligating lingual brackets according to tooth displacement during initial leveling and alignment: an in vitro mechanical studyBum-Soon Lim, Do-Yoon Kim, Seung-Hak Baek대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2016 · 제46권 제2호Effect of passive self-ligating bracket placement on the posterior teeth on reduction of frictional force in sliding mechanicsKyu-Ry Kim, Seung-Hak Baek대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2016 · 제46권 제2호A comparative study of frictional force in self-ligating brackets according to the bracket-archwire angulation, bracket material, and wire type황충주, Souk Min Lee대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2015 · 제45권 제1호Comparison of the frictional characteristics of aesthetic orthodontic brackets measured using a modified in vitro techniqueBerat Serdar Akdeniz, Nursel Arici, Selim Arici대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2015 · 제45권 제1호In vitro evaluation of resistance to sliding in self-ligating and conventional bracket systems during dental alignmentAngela Militi, Antonino Lo Giudice, Giancarlo Cordasco, Giovanni Matarese, Giuseppe Triolo, Riccardo Nucera대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2012 · 제42권 제4호Comparison of frictional forces between aesthetic orthodontic coated wires and self-ligation brackets김윤미, 유형석, 차정열, 황충주, Seon Gun Tahk대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2014 · 제44권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)