본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국인의 중국어 작문 텍스트 속 주어 출몰 현상에 대한 응집성(cohesion) 및 응결성(coherence)의 적용 방안 고찰

A Study on Application of Cohesion and Coherence to Subject Appearing and Disappearing in Chinese Writing Text by Koreans

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this paper is to study the using patterns of coherence devices to secure the cohesion of texts in relation to the appearing and disappearing of subject in Chinese writing texts by Koreans have advanced Chinese level. This paper divided the coherence devices into five kinds such as ‘Reference, Substitution, Ellipsis, Conjunction, Lexical Coherence’. Lexical Coherence is classified as homotype reiteration, partial homotype reiteration, synonym and generic term. The results of the analysis are as follows: First, in Chinese writing text, Koreans mainly use lexical coherence such as homotype reiteration, partial homotype reiteration with respect to subject appearance, and occasionally use reference and substitution. Second, in Chinese writing text, Koreans mainly use progressive ellipsis or author ellipsis in relation to the disappearance of subject, occasionally use general ellipsis or dialogic ellipsis, and rarely use regressive ellipsis. Third, the most prevalent principle of appearing subject in writing text is the meaning response of subject and predicate. If the subject of a predicate in a sentence is different from that of a predicate in other sentence, if the subject of the predicate is different from the subject of the nested clause, if the subject of the predicate is different from that of a predicate in a complex sentence, the subject must appear. However, Koreans often fail to make proper use of the subject corresponding to each predicate. Fourth, even though the subject of the predicate in the front and back sentences is the same and has already appeared in the context, if there is a distance between them and there are other interference terms in the middle, communication with the reader may not be smooth, so it is preferable to make the subject appear.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to study the using patterns of coherence devices to secure the cohesion of texts in relation to the appearing and disappearing of subject in Chinese writing texts by Koreans have advanced Chinese level. This paper divided the coherence devices into five kinds such as ‘Reference, Substitution, Ellipsis, Conjunction, Lexical Coherence’. Lexical Coherence is classified as homotype reiteration, partial homotype reiteration, synonym and generic term. The results of the analysis are as follows: First, in Chinese writing text, Koreans mainly use lexical coherence such as homotype reiteration, partial homotype reiteration with respect to subject appearance, and occasionally use reference and substitution. Second, in Chinese writing text, Koreans mainly use progressive ellipsis or author ellipsis in relation to the disappearance of subject, occasionally use general ellipsis or dialogic ellipsis, and rarely use regressive ellipsis. Third, the most prevalent principle of appearing subject in writing text is the meaning response of subject and predicate. If the subject of a predicate in a sentence is different from that of a predicate in other sentence, if the subject of the predicate is different from the subject of the nested clause, if the subject of the predicate is different from that of a predicate in a complex sentence, the subject must appear. However, Koreans often fail to make proper use of the subject corresponding to each predicate. Fourth, even though the subject of the predicate in the front and back sentences is the same and has already appeared in the context, if there is a distance between them and there are other interference terms in the middle, communication with the reader may not be smooth, so it is preferable to make the subject appear.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 瞿宗德, "漢語中主語隱現句及其英譯", 上海海運學院學報, (2), pp.106~114 (1997)
  2. 金慧婷, "篇章語言學視角下的中韓主語省略對比硏究", 博士, pp.2014
  3. 廖秋忠, "現代漢語篇章中指同的表達", 中國語文, (2), pp.88~96 (1986)
  4. 馬明艶, "二語學習者漢語語篇構建硏究" (2015), 中國社會科學出版社
  5. 潘海華, "優選論與漢語主語的確認", 中國語文, (1), pp.3~13 (2002)
  6. 方梅, "關於複句中分句主語省略的問題", 延邊大學學報, (1), pp.44~54 (1985)
  7. 徐糾糾, "現代漢語回指硏究" (2003), 中國社會科學出版社
  8. 연동숙, "한국어와 중국어의 텍스트 결속 대조 연구 : 제보 기능 신문 텍스트를 중심으로", 박사, 중국어학, pp.2005
  9. 兪敦雨, "主語省略的幾種特殊方式", 邏輯與語言學習, (4), pp.43~45 (1987)
  10. 劉月華, "實用現代漢語語法" (2001), 商務印書館
  11. 이관규, "학교 문법론" (2005), 월인
  12. 이동혁, "대학 글쓰기에서 주어 사용 오류의 현황 분석과 주어 사용 지도 방안", 한말연구, (25), pp.191~220 (2009), 한말연구학회[DOI]
  13. 이민우, "현대중국어의 주어 생략에 관한 연구---주어에 대한 재인식을 바탕으로", 중국언어연구, (22), pp.97~133 (2006), 한국중국언어학회
  14. 이석규, "텍스트 분석의 실제" (2003), 역락
  15. 張德祿, "語篇連貫與衔接理論的發展及應用" (2003), 上海外語敎育出版社
  16. 정희모, "대학 글쓰기 연구와 텍스트 해석" (2015), 보고사
  17. 주회민, "한중 연설문 텍스트의 문법적 응결 장치 대조 연구(Ⅰ)", 한국어학, 61, pp.339~367 (2013), 한국어학회
  18. 陳偉英, "漢語主語省略的認知語用硏究", 博士, pp.2008
  19. 華宏儀, "主語承主語省略探討", 烟台師範學院學報, (1), pp.83~89 (2001)
  20. 華宏儀, "主語承非主語省略探討", 烟台師範學院學報, (2), pp.88~95 (2002)
  21. 한국텍스트언어학회, "텍스트언어학의 이해" (2009), 박이정
  22. 胡壯麟, "語篇的衔接餘連貫3" (1994), 上海外語敎育出版社
  23. 黃國文, "語篇分析槪要" (1988), 湖南敎育出版社
  24. Ariel, M, "Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedent" (1990), Routledge
  25. Beaugrande, R., "談話⋅텍스트言語學 入門" (1991), 양영각
  26. Halliday, M.A.K, "Cohesion in English" (1976), Group Ltd
  27. "BCC語料庫"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)