규범적 정의론과 절차적 정의
Normative Theory of Justice and Procedural Justice
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is well known that the discussion over substantial justice is distinguished characteristic in contemporary theory of justice and have brought prosperous era on normative theory of justice. The normative theory of justice should deal with the following issues. The first principle is the ground and limitation on an ideology of formal justice, and the second one is the concept of universal principal as a standard of justice and its justification. The first issue is more fundamental philosophically, because it is related on the common premise such as ground and limitation of justice among people who stands different standpoint on the second problem. Meanwhile, the second issue has become the center of public interest in modern theory of justice. This paper considered the justifiability of substantial justice, focused on the procedural justice by J. Rawls, accepting diversity of value, overcoming extreme relativism and maintaining possibility of practical consent in modern society based on multiplicity. Especially, I emphasized on the procedural justice based on the original position and the reflective equilibrium, the Constructivism developed by I. Kant and fair background justice.
Abstract
It is well known that the discussion over substantial justice is distinguished characteristic in contemporary theory of justice and have brought prosperous era on normative theory of justice. The normative theory of justice should deal with the following issues. The first principle is the ground and limitation on an ideology of formal justice, and the second one is the concept of universal principal as a standard of justice and its justification. The first issue is more fundamental philosophically, because it is related on the common premise such as ground and limitation of justice among people who stands different standpoint on the second problem. Meanwhile, the second issue has become the center of public interest in modern theory of justice. This paper considered the justifiability of substantial justice, focused on the procedural justice by J. Rawls, accepting diversity of value, overcoming extreme relativism and maintaining possibility of practical consent in modern society based on multiplicity. Especially, I emphasized on the procedural justice based on the original position and the reflective equilibrium, the Constructivism developed by I. Kant and fair background justice.
참고문헌 (20)
- 이동희, "현대법철학에 있어서의 정의의 기준에 관한 논의", 법학논총 (2005), 단국대학교 법학연구소
- 이동희, "실질적 정의원리의 정당화", 법철학연구, 10(2), pp.297~316 (2007), 한국법철학회
- 카우프만, "현대법철학의 근본문제" (1980), 박영사
- 정원규, "도덕합의론과 공화민주주의 : 롤즈와 하버마스의 이론을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2001
- 井上達夫, "正義論, In 現代法哲學 1, 法理論" (1983), 東京大學出版會
- B. Barry, "Political Argument" (1965), Routledge & Kegan Paul
- N. P. Barry, "Hayek’s Sovial and Economic Philosophy" (1979), The Macmilian Press Ltd
- H. G. Blocker, "J. Rawls’ Theory of Social Justice : An Introduction" (1980), Ohio Univ. Press
- N. Daniels, "Reading Rawls : Critical Studies on Rawls’ A Theory of Justice" (1975), Basic Books
- K. Engish, "Auf der Suche nach der Gerechtigkeit, München", ~ (1971)
- F. A. Hayek, "Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 2" (1976), Routledge&Kegan Paul
- R. Nozick, Anarchy, "State and Utopia" (1974), Basic Books
- J. Rawls, "A Theory of Justice" (1971), Harvard Univ. Press
- J. Rawls, "The Independence of Moral Theory", Proceedings and Adresses of the American Philosophical Association, 48, pp.1974~1975
- J. Rawls, "Fairness to Goodness", The Philosophical Review, 84 (1975)
- J. Rawls, "The Basic Structure as Subject" (1978), Values and Morals
- J. Rawls, "A Well-Ordered Society" (1979), Philosophy, Politics and Society
- J. Rawls, "Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory", The Journal of Philosophy, 77 (1980)
- J. Rawls, "Social Unity and Primary Goods" (1982), Utilitarianism and Beyond
- W. Nelson, "The Very Idea of Pure Procedural Justice", Ethics, 90 (1984)