근로권의 헌법합치적 해석에 관한 연구 -독일에서의 단결권과 단체교섭권 해석문제를 중심으로-
A Study on the Constitutional Interpretation of Right to Labor
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
German “labor law” is the rules which are applicable to the employment relationship and which structure the collective relationship between capital and labour. German individual labor law is focused on the individual employment relationship, on the other hand collective law is focused on the structures of industrial relationship. The expression “Freedom of Association” in german fundamental law(Grundgesetz) refers to the right of employees and employers to organize themselves in order to safeguard their occupational interest. In germany “Freedom of Association” is understood not only the “right to set up association”, but also comprises a whole range of rights without which the right to organize would lose much of its meaning. “Freedom of Association” means two different rights, so called “positive Freedom of Association” and “negative Freedom of Association”. The “positive Freedom of Association” is the right to join an association, to remain in an association an to be active in an association, whereas the “negative Freedom of Association” means the freedom not to join an association or to leave an association. For the more the German Constitution not only protects the individual’s freedom of association but also guarantees collective industrial organization that have been set up to guard and promote the employment and economic conditions of their members. In german legal system there is no such article, that restrain the individual right to organize or participate to trade union. However german trade unions are mainly organized on an industry or a branch basis and therefore a union is open to all employees in the industry concerned, no matter which trade or occupation they are engaged in. This again implies that there is practically only one union for all employees of the branch or industry. But according to the general theory of fundamental right, in the future the right to association can be restricted if necessary.
Abstract
German “labor law” is the rules which are applicable to the employment relationship and which structure the collective relationship between capital and labour. German individual labor law is focused on the individual employment relationship, on the other hand collective law is focused on the structures of industrial relationship. The expression “Freedom of Association” in german fundamental law(Grundgesetz) refers to the right of employees and employers to organize themselves in order to safeguard their occupational interest. In germany “Freedom of Association” is understood not only the “right to set up association”, but also comprises a whole range of rights without which the right to organize would lose much of its meaning. “Freedom of Association” means two different rights, so called “positive Freedom of Association” and “negative Freedom of Association”. The “positive Freedom of Association” is the right to join an association, to remain in an association an to be active in an association, whereas the “negative Freedom of Association” means the freedom not to join an association or to leave an association. For the more the German Constitution not only protects the individual’s freedom of association but also guarantees collective industrial organization that have been set up to guard and promote the employment and economic conditions of their members. In german legal system there is no such article, that restrain the individual right to organize or participate to trade union. However german trade unions are mainly organized on an industry or a branch basis and therefore a union is open to all employees in the industry concerned, no matter which trade or occupation they are engaged in. This again implies that there is practically only one union for all employees of the branch or industry. But according to the general theory of fundamental right, in the future the right to association can be restricted if necessary.
참고문헌 (18)
- Arbeitsrecht, "Brox", Stuttgart, ~ (1999)
- Dolzer, "Bonner Kommentar, Art. 3 Abs 1", ~ (1990)
- H. Steiner, "Die Rechtssprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts zu Art. 9 Abs. 3 GG", AöR, 109 (1984)
- I, "Das Staatsrecht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland Band IV", pp.2006, K. Stern
- Pieroth, "Grundrechte Staatsrecht II 20. Auflage" (2004), München
- W. Zöllner, "Die Rechtssprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts zu Art. 9 Abs. 3 GG", AöR, 98 (1973)
- 김유성, "노동법 II" (1997), 법문사
- 김현철, "미국 헌법상 평등보호와 엄격심사기준에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2001
- 김형배, "노동조합의 대표성과 제2노조의 문제", 노동법학, (2) (1989)
- 문형남, "복수노조체제에서의 단체교섭창구 단일화 방안에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1999
- 박종보, "미국헌법이 한국헌법에 미친 영향", 법학논총, 24(3), pp.57~76 (2007), 법학연구소
- 유성재, "2010년 개정 노동법에 대한 입법론적 평가", 노동법학, (34), pp.1~31 (2010), 한국노동법학회
- 유성천, "노동조합의 조직 및 활동과 노동관계법 제3조 단서 5호와 복수노조문제를 중심으로", 노동법의 제문제 (1998), 한국노동연구원
- 이노홍, "미국헌법상 평등권 심사기준" (2007), 홍익대 출판부
- 임종률, "단체교섭 및 노동쟁의와 노동관계법, in 노동관계법의 제문제" (1988), 한국노동연구원
- 정문식, "평등위반 심사기준으로서 비례원칙", 법학연구, 51(1), pp.5~47 (2010), 법학연구소
- 한상운, "현행 헌법상 평등심사기준에 관한 연구 - 헌법재판소 판례를 중심으로 -", 성균관법학, 20(1), pp.65~88 (2008), 법학연구소
- 헌법재판소, "기본권 영역별 위헌심사의 기준과 방법" (2008), 헌법재판소
