독일 집단적 노사관계법상 판례 법리의 주요 특징 - 노사관계 안정화를 위한 노동조합 및 단체협약적용 관련 판례이론을 중심으로 -
The Principle of Judicial Decisions on German Labor Relations Laws - On the Decisions treating with Labor Unions and Collective Bargaining Agreements for the Stable Labor Relations
1
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A lots of the principles in German labor relations laws have been developed by judicial decisions because the effective acts did not exist for the labor relations. Most of all, the Federal Court of Labor has still maintained two important principles, even though many scholars have objected them. The one is the principle of social power to be legally recognized as the labor union. The other one is only one agreement to be binding, when collective agreements happen to exist in plural. This is to explore the implications of the judgments of the Federal Court of Labor for us with specific cases. The judgments and interpretations of the court could be a kind of guidance for some complex issues surrounding the provisions of single bargaining unit to be effective next year in Korea. The Federal Court of Labor in Germany tends to put emphasis on the legal stability rather than the logic of legal theory. It can be considered as very useful methods to interpretate and apply our labor relations laws in the future.
Abstract
A lots of the principles in German labor relations laws have been developed by judicial decisions because the effective acts did not exist for the labor relations. Most of all, the Federal Court of Labor has still maintained two important principles, even though many scholars have objected them. The one is the principle of social power to be legally recognized as the labor union. The other one is only one agreement to be binding, when collective agreements happen to exist in plural. This is to explore the implications of the judgments of the Federal Court of Labor for us with specific cases. The judgments and interpretations of the court could be a kind of guidance for some complex issues surrounding the provisions of single bargaining unit to be effective next year in Korea. The Federal Court of Labor in Germany tends to put emphasis on the legal stability rather than the logic of legal theory. It can be considered as very useful methods to interpretate and apply our labor relations laws in the future.
참고문헌 (19)
- 김미영, "미국의 집단적 노사관계 법리에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2009
- 김유선, "복수노조 산별노조 시대의 단체교섭구조 개선방향" (2005), 한국노총중앙연구원
- 박종희, "독일의 단체교섭 구조", 고려법학, (41) (2003)
- 박종희, "협약자치의 견지에서 본 단체교섭응낙 가처분결정인용에 관한 비판적 고찰", 안암법학, (31), pp.133~158 (2010), 안암법학회
- 유성재, "단체협약의 경합․병존과 단일 단체협약의 원칙", 노동법학, (29), pp.261~287 (2009), 한국노동법학회
- Däubler, "TVG, 2. Aufl.", ~ (2006)
- "Eitel, Die Ungleichbehandlung der repräsentativen und nicht repräsentativen Gewerkschaften durch den Staat", ~ (1991)
- "Franzen, Rechtliche wie praktische Unzuträglichkeiten einer Tarifpluralität, NZA", ~ (2006)
- "Gamillscheg, Arbeitsrecht II, 6. Aufl.", ~ (1986)
- "Hanau, Verbands-, Tarif- und Gerichtspluralismus, NZA", ~ (2003)
- "Henssler, Unternehmenstrukturierung und Tarifvertrag, FS Schaub", ~ (1998)
- "Hromadka, Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Regelung der Tarifkollision, NZA", ~ (2008)
- "Jacobs, Tarifeinheit und Tarifkonkurrenz", ~ (1999)
- "Kania, Tarifpluralität und Industrieverbandsprinzip, DB", ~ (1996)
- "Konzen, Die Tarifeinheit im Betrieb, RdA", ~ (1978)
- "Kraft, Tarifkonkurrenz. Tarifpluralität und das Prinzip der Tarifeinheit, RdA", ~ (1992)
- "Mertens, Das Prinzip der Tarifeinheit als arbeitsrechtliche Kollisionsnorm, BB", ~ (1993)
- "Schaub, Wege und Irrwege aus dem Flächentarifvertrag, NZA", ~ (1998)
- "Zöllner", Loritz, pp.2008, ~