본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

주민투표제도의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구

A Study on the Problem of Referendum System and Its Improvement

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Local referendum is stipulated for the right of resident’s vote in order to supplement the deficiency of representative democracy system which is a principle of the administration of local autonomy, and local autonomy system in Korean society is taking root gradually along with the introduction of local referendum system known as an element of direct democracy to supplement representative democracy. From the viewpoint that decisions are made through a direct vote by local residents to solve their local issues, referendum performs a role to enhance the status of residents and secure the legitimacy of problem-solving. It also has a positive value that it can counterbalance central government for its one-directional instruction or enforcement to local government. Since the result of referendum can be considered as a collective embodiment of residents’ opinion, it can exert great influence and give a considerable pressure in future policy-making of central government and local government. Hence, it is necessary to review carefully how the subject, requirement, motion, requirement of gathering signatures, vote campaign, relief and penalty of the Referendum Act that will be mentioned here below should be determined and whether legal binding force shall be given to the result of referendum. There are various problems in current referendum system caused by the problems of its own but also by a wrong application of this system. After all,such problems undermine the value of referendum by making damages on securing fundamental signification and fare procedure as well as the legitimacy of the result. Nevertheless, when considering its value as a countermeasure against various problems and the importance of its result, improvement of the referendum system in our society is very important and urgent issue. Hence, this article intends to investigate the institutional problems of the current referendum system through a case study and find its improvement.

Abstract

Local referendum is stipulated for the right of resident’s vote in order to supplement the deficiency of representative democracy system which is a principle of the administration of local autonomy, and local autonomy system in Korean society is taking root gradually along with the introduction of local referendum system known as an element of direct democracy to supplement representative democracy. From the viewpoint that decisions are made through a direct vote by local residents to solve their local issues, referendum performs a role to enhance the status of residents and secure the legitimacy of problem-solving. It also has a positive value that it can counterbalance central government for its one-directional instruction or enforcement to local government. Since the result of referendum can be considered as a collective embodiment of residents’ opinion, it can exert great influence and give a considerable pressure in future policy-making of central government and local government. Hence, it is necessary to review carefully how the subject, requirement, motion, requirement of gathering signatures, vote campaign, relief and penalty of the Referendum Act that will be mentioned here below should be determined and whether legal binding force shall be given to the result of referendum. There are various problems in current referendum system caused by the problems of its own but also by a wrong application of this system. After all,such problems undermine the value of referendum by making damages on securing fundamental signification and fare procedure as well as the legitimacy of the result. Nevertheless, when considering its value as a countermeasure against various problems and the importance of its result, improvement of the referendum system in our society is very important and urgent issue. Hence, this article intends to investigate the institutional problems of the current referendum system through a case study and find its improvement.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. 정종섭, "헌법학원론" (2010), 박영사
  2. 주민직접참여의 활성화를 위한 법제정 방향, "김명연", 한국법제연구원, ~ (1999)
  3. 김병준, "한국지방자치론 : 지방정치ㆍ자치행정ㆍ자치경영" (2000), 법문사
  4. 김철수, "헌법학개론" (2003), 박영사
  5. 오관석, "지방정치와 문화참여" (2007)
  6. 정하중, "행정법개론" (2011), 법문사
  7. 천병태, "지방자치법" (1998), 삼영사
  8. 최우용, "지방자치법강의" (2004), 동아대학교출판부
  9. 홍성방, "헌법학(中)" (2011), 박영사
  10. 홍정선, "지방자치법학" (2009), 박영사
  11. 김동건, "주민투표에 관한 일고찰", 지방자치법연구, 6(1), pp.103~136 (2006), 한국지방자치법학회
  12. 김상겸, "서울시 주민투표가 남긴 법적 문제", 무상급식주민투표, 무엇을 남겼나 - 바른사회시민회의 토론회 (2011)
  13. 김영삼, "주민참정제도에 관한 고찰- 주민투표와 주민소환을 중심으로, In 허경교수화갑기념논문집" (1999)
  14. 김영수, "주민투표제도의 내용 및 문제점들", 도시와빈곤, 통권 : 81 (2006)
  15. 김중권, "주민투표법안의 문제점에 관한 소고- 지방자치의 Up-grade인가 공법질서의 혼란유발원인가?-", 공법연구, 32(3), pp.87~133 (2004), 한국공법학회
  16. 김희곤, "지방자치법상 주민투표제도의 의의 및 과제", 공법연구, 27(1) (1998)
  17. 배준구, "프랑스의 지방분권 개혁", 한국사회와 행정연구, 14(4) (2004), 서울행정학회
  18. 백승주, "지방자치법상 주민투표제에 관한 연구", 지방자치논단, 1(1) (2000)
  19. 손흥수, "주민투표에 관한 몇 가지 법률적 쟁점", 법조, 54(7), pp.87~116 (2005), 법조협회
  20. 신봉기, "주민투표사건 판례에 관한 비판적 연구 - 주민투표법 미제정및 미군부대이전 주민투표조례사건과 관련하여", 지방자치연구, 3(1) (2003)
  21. 신봉기, "한국과 독일의 지방자치법상 주민투표제에 관한 연구", 공법연구, 28(2) (1999)
  22. 안성호, "주민투표법 제정의 논거와 개혁과제", 한국사회와행정연구, 12(1) (2005)
  23. 양영철, "제주도 주민투표 사례에 관한 연구", 한국사회와 행정연구, 16(3), pp.299~323 (2005), 서울행정학회
  24. 이기우, "주민투표제도의 입법방향", 공법연구, 27(1) (1998)
  25. 이상팔, "주민투표제도의 필요성과 문제점 분석", 춘계학술대회 발표논문집 (1998)
  26. 정일섭, "주민투표에 대한 평가", 한국지방자치학회보, 18(4), pp.5~23 (2006), 한국지방자치학회
  27. 정정목, "주민투표제의 실시와 과제, 청주ㆍ청원 주민투표 결과와 문제점", 지방행정, 55 (2006)
  28. 천병태, "지방자치법상의 대표민주제와 직접민주제- 주민발안제도를중심으로", 지방자치, (102) (1997)
  29. 최봉기, "중앙정부에 의한 지역간 경쟁적 주민투표제도의 개선과제", 한국지방자치학회보, 18(2), pp.5~26 (2006), 한국지방자치학회
  30. 최봉석, "주민참여의 고양과 지방의회의 활성화", 한림법학 FORUM, 11 (2002)
  31. 최우용, "국가사무 결정의 주민투표활용과 법적 문제점", 지방행정, 53(610) (2004)
  32. 박영도, "주민투표법의 입법방향" (1996), 한국법제연구원
  33. 국회행정자치위원회, "주민투표법의 입법방향" (2002), 국회행정자치위원회
  34. Brian L. Lerner, "Restoring Accountability at the Municipal Level: The Save Miami Beach Zoning Referendum", U. Miami L Rev, 53, pp.541~ (1999)
  35. "대형교회목사등주민투표법위반" (2012), 안홍석[URL]
  36. "금융위 전 금융권에 투표독려 파문" (2012), 김동현[URL]
  37. "지더라도 ‘보수 잔다르크’ 이미지… 死則生 효과 길게 봤나" (2012), 김범석[URL]
  38. "불법 투표불참운동 조장한 중앙 선관위해체하라" (2012), 최경선[URL]
  39. "지식인 100명 시국선언" (2012), 전경웅[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (35건)