직접민주제로서의 주민참여제도의 비교법적 고찰
A Comparative Analysis of the Recall System as a Direct Democracy and It's Implication
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There are various kinds of devices to get rid of the limits of modern representative system in the local self-governing. Among them, recall is a good guarantee for inspecting and controlling malpractice of resident's representative. A local autonomy law is a political system or self-determination by residents. A recall election is a procedure by which voters can remove an elected official from office before his term expires. The symbolic meaning of recall is more important than it's practical one. Recall is a procedural device of democracy in which the voters can dismiss the public officers from their position within their term of office by denunciation, petition and voting. This policy can be considered to be a means for yielding acivil control characteristic of direct democracy in order to secure the responsibility of the public officers to the residents they serve. If Recall can be effectively utilized, the local residents can have greater confidence on their local government, and this policy will also contribute a lot to demonstrating the efficacy of democracy. However, despite this importance, the lack of experience for Recall brings about ceaseless controversies about the potential abuse of this policy, and it is necessary to deeply review the proper direction to utilize there residents recalling power in the local self-government of Korea. By doing so, this study aims to find a solution to make Recall of Korea actually become settled asa way of direct participation of people. Therefore, this research focused on the study of literature and the case study in order to find a settlement plan by reviewing the realistic cases. This study aimed to suggest not only how the details of the current ordinance should be revised, but also how the ordinance itself should be modified for the appropriate settlement of Recall. In this respect, this study has the form of a descriptive research and at the same time has the characteristic of a prescriptive research.
Abstract
There are various kinds of devices to get rid of the limits of modern representative system in the local self-governing. Among them, recall is a good guarantee for inspecting and controlling malpractice of resident's representative. A local autonomy law is a political system or self-determination by residents. A recall election is a procedure by which voters can remove an elected official from office before his term expires. The symbolic meaning of recall is more important than it's practical one. Recall is a procedural device of democracy in which the voters can dismiss the public officers from their position within their term of office by denunciation, petition and voting. This policy can be considered to be a means for yielding acivil control characteristic of direct democracy in order to secure the responsibility of the public officers to the residents they serve. If Recall can be effectively utilized, the local residents can have greater confidence on their local government, and this policy will also contribute a lot to demonstrating the efficacy of democracy. However, despite this importance, the lack of experience for Recall brings about ceaseless controversies about the potential abuse of this policy, and it is necessary to deeply review the proper direction to utilize there residents recalling power in the local self-government of Korea. By doing so, this study aims to find a solution to make Recall of Korea actually become settled asa way of direct participation of people. Therefore, this research focused on the study of literature and the case study in order to find a settlement plan by reviewing the realistic cases. This study aimed to suggest not only how the details of the current ordinance should be revised, but also how the ordinance itself should be modified for the appropriate settlement of Recall. In this respect, this study has the form of a descriptive research and at the same time has the characteristic of a prescriptive research.
참고문헌 (47)
- 강창일, "정책토론회 자료집 -주민소환제 관련법 어떻게 만들 것인가?,주민소환제 입법방향과 주요 쟁점: 하 승수 변호사 발제안", 주민소환제 입법방향과 주요 쟁점: 하 승수 변호사 발제안, ~ (2005)
- 경기개발연구원, "日本の地方政治と議會 일본의 지방정치와 의회, 경기개발연구원", ~ (1998)
- 김영기, "지방행정의 책임성 확보방안 - 주민소환제의 도입과 과제", 지방행정, 53(605) (2004)
- 길준규, "주민소환제의 법리적 검토", 공법연구, 34(1) (2006), 한국공법학회
- 나일경, "일본의 직접민주주의 제도의 정치사회적 의미와 시민사회(운동)의 과제", 시민사회와 NGO, 4(2) (2006), 한양대 제3섹터연구소
- 노찬백, "주민소환제에 관한 연구", 시민정치학회보, 6 (2003)
- 백종인, "일본의 지방자치법상 주민자치실현을 위한 제도의 실증적고찰과 구조적 상관관계", 공법연구, 27(2) (1999)
- 송영철, "현장에서 바라본 일본의 지방자치" (2001), 지샘
- 신봉기, "지방자치에 있어서 직접민주제 방식의 도입- 특히 주민소환제와 관련하여", 공법연구, 33(1), pp.181~212 (2004), 한국공법학회
- 신봉기, "주민소환제 입법의 방향", 자치연구, 16 (2006), 제1ㆍ2합병 후, 한국지방자치연구소
- 안성호, "분권과 참여, 스위스의 교훈" (2005), 다운샘
- 이기우, "지방분권과 시민참여" (2003), 역사넷
- 이기우, "주민소환제도의 의의와 쟁점", 자치행정 (2003)
- 이기우, "지방자치법" (2007), 대영문화사
- 이호철, "일본의 지방자치" (1996), 삼성경제연구소
- 임승빈, "주민소환제도의 시행에 따른 논쟁점과 개선방안”, 주민소환제 정책세미나 개최 결과, 주최: 한국지방정책연구원", ~ (2007)
- 진세혁, "주민소환제의 도입과 과제", 지방행정, 55, pp.634~ (2006)
- 최봉석, "주민소환제에 관한 독일에서의 논의와 법제", 공법연구, 30(1) (2001), 한국공법학회
- 최종만, "일본의 자치제 개혁" (1998), 나남
- 하승수, "주민소환제도의 바람직한 도입방향", 자치행정, (159) (2001)
- 하승수, "주민소환제도의 특징과 시민사회에 주는 함의", 시민사회와 NGO, 4(2) (2006)
- 하승수, "주민소환제도의 특징과 시민사회에 주는 함의", 시민사회와 NGO, 4(2)
- 하승수, "지역, 지방자치, 그리고 민주주의" (2007), 후마니타스
- 한귀현, "주민참여법제의 개선방안연구, 한국법제연구원", ~ (2003)
- 한귀현, "주민소환제도의 도입방안에 관한 연구", 토지공법연구, 21 (2004)
- 한상우, "주민소환제의 정착방안", 행정문제논집, 21 (2006), 한양대학교 행정문제연구소
- 한종임, "주민소환제도의 도입에 관한 구(Ⅰ)", 지방자치, 164 (2002)
- 함인선, "주민소환제도에 관한 입법론적 고찰, 일본자치단체의 장 해직청구제도를 중심으로 하여", 공법학연구, 5(2) (2003)
- 한국지방행정연구원, "성공한 단체장 실패한 단체장", ~ (1995)
- 행정자치부, "선진외국의 지방자치제도", ~ (2000)
- 兼子 仁, "新 地方自治法" (1999), 岩波書店
- 吉川俊一 編, "住民參政制度, ぎょうせい", ~ (2003)
- 上田 道明, "自治を問う住民投票" (2003), 自治體硏究社
- 生田希保美, "アメリカの直接參加ㆍ住民投票" (1997), 自治體硏究社
- 小潼敏之, "アメリカの地方自治" (2004), 第一法規
- 久世公堯, "地方自治制度" (1976), 第一法規
- 大杉洋, "なぜ住民投票なのか, 橫田淸.住民投票Ⅰ,公人社", ~ (1997)
- 渡邊登, "地方におけゐ市民の可能性", 都市問題 (1997)
- 伊藤守, "ヂモクテシ?#リフレクショソ:卷町住民投票の社會學" (2005), りべルタ出版
- 中川一好, "卷町におけゐ住民投票", 都市問題 (1996)
- 大川ほか, "原子力をめぐる社會意思決定プロセスの檢討-卷町と北", ~ (2005)
- "海道の發電所立地事例硏究", 社會技術硏究論文集, 3
- R. Fisher, "Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving" (1981), Houghton Mifflin
- Thomas E, "Cronin Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum and Recall" (1999), Harvard Univ. Press
- Shaw, Daron, "Strategic Voting In The California Recall Election", American Politic Research, 33(2) (2005)
- Felchner, M. E, "Recall Elections : Democracy in Action or Populism Run Amok", Campaigns & Elections, 25(5) (2004)
- "Oregon Secretary of State, Recall Manual, State of Oregon", ~ (2006)