멕시코 나와들어와 우리말의 비교 연구(1)
A comparative study of Nahuatl of Mexico and Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, I first examine what criteria have been raised since the beginning of language studies, to affirm that the languages of other nations were of the same lineage or the same root language. Then, I examine what kind of criticism has been made about the comparative study between Korean and other languages, especially Mongolian. According to the opinions raised by linguists, to affirm that two languages would be derived from the same lineage or from the same root, it is necessary not only the coincidence of the basic words but also that of nouns, predicates, phonological rules and morphemes. Naturally, both languages should have in common the same grammar rule in the process of combining morphemes. I next examine the nominal phrases of Nahuatl, the indigenous language of Mexico, and of the Korean language, analyzing them in morphemes and comparing them, in order to confirm that the noun phrases coincide in their pronunciation and meaning. In this process, I have confirmed that in both languages the basic words are coincided, such as 'moon', name of a natural object, and 'foot', name of a part of the human body. Especially, through morphological analysis, I have come to know that Nahuatl shares the phonological rule with Korean, that is, the intrinsic grammar of Korean as the use of morpheme 'n' in the process of the combination of morphemes. I could also confirm that there is a coincidence of the personal pronouns between both languages, and see that there are also the nominative case particles '이 (i)' and '가 (ca)' of Korean in Nahuatl. And both languages have several identical predicates in common. It will be very important that the ancient words or dialects like 'colhua / coli' of Nahuatl and '골회 (colhue) / 고리 (coli)' of Korean have coincided, because that would mean that both languages do not only have a mere coincidence of some words but also, with more importance, that of the ancient dialects.
Abstract
In this study, I first examine what criteria have been raised since the beginning of language studies, to affirm that the languages of other nations were of the same lineage or the same root language. Then, I examine what kind of criticism has been made about the comparative study between Korean and other languages, especially Mongolian. According to the opinions raised by linguists, to affirm that two languages would be derived from the same lineage or from the same root, it is necessary not only the coincidence of the basic words but also that of nouns, predicates, phonological rules and morphemes. Naturally, both languages should have in common the same grammar rule in the process of combining morphemes. I next examine the nominal phrases of Nahuatl, the indigenous language of Mexico, and of the Korean language, analyzing them in morphemes and comparing them, in order to confirm that the noun phrases coincide in their pronunciation and meaning. In this process, I have confirmed that in both languages the basic words are coincided, such as 'moon', name of a natural object, and 'foot', name of a part of the human body. Especially, through morphological analysis, I have come to know that Nahuatl shares the phonological rule with Korean, that is, the intrinsic grammar of Korean as the use of morpheme 'n' in the process of the combination of morphemes. I could also confirm that there is a coincidence of the personal pronouns between both languages, and see that there are also the nominative case particles '이 (i)' and '가 (ca)' of Korean in Nahuatl. And both languages have several identical predicates in common. It will be very important that the ancient words or dialects like 'colhua / coli' of Nahuatl and '골회 (colhue) / 고리 (coli)' of Korean have coincided, because that would mean that both languages do not only have a mere coincidence of some words but also, with more importance, that of the ancient dialects.
참고문헌 (40)
- 강길운, "고대사의 비교언어학적 연구" (1990), 새문사
- 김방한, "한국어 계통 연구의 문제점", 언어학, 1, pp.3~24 (1976)
- 김방한, "만주어 몽골어 동물 명칭에 관하여", 동북문화연구, (24), pp.245~259 (1980)
- 김방한, "원시 한반도어", 한국문화, 1, pp.1~25 (1980)
- 박은용, "한국어와 만주어 비교연구", 효성여자대학교논문집, 14통권 : 1, pp.101~207 (1974)
- 서정범, "우리말의 뿌리" (1999), 고려원
- 서정범, "국어어원사전" (2000), 도서출판 보고사
- 손성태, "중남미 고대어에 나타난 우리말의 흔적(2)-아스텍제국 나와들어를 중심으로", 제34회 국어학회 겨울발표회 자료집, pp.261~276 (2008)
- 손성태, "아스텍의 역사 제도 풍습 및 지명에 나타나는 우리말 연구", 스페인․라틴아메리카 연구, 2, pp.1~54 (2009)
- 손성태, "아스텍제국에 나타난 우리민족의 풍습", 비교민속학, (43), pp.299~347 (2010), 비교민속학회
- 손성태, "멕이코에 나타난 우리민족의 문화와 언어", 2011년 현대문법학회－대한언어학회 공동학술대회 자료집, pp.149~180 (2011)
- 손성태, "멕이코에 나타난 우리민족의 언어 -나와들어의 생활용어를 중심으로-", 언어학, 19(3), pp.185~211 (2011), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- 손성태, "멕시코의 국명 및 지명연구 -멕시코와 우리나라의 비교 역사 및 언어학적 관점에서-", 언어학, 21(3), pp.385~406 (2013), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- 손성태, "우리민족의 대이동-아메리카 인디언은 우리민족이다" (2014), 코리출판
- 손성태, "고대 아메리카에 나타난 우리민족의 태극" (2017), 코리출판
- 손성태, "la Similitud de la cultura y lengua antiguas entre mexicanos y coreanos", 2018 멕시코 국립 UNAM대학교 및 NuevoLeon대학교 특강 자료집, 1~22 (2018)
- Anawalt, P. R., "Indian clothing before Cortés" (1990), University of Oklahoma Press
- Anderson, A., "Rules of the Aztec language" (1992), University of Utah Press
- Andrés de Olmos, "Arte para aprender la lengua mexicana" (1972), Edmundo Aviña Levy Ed
- Davies, N., "The Toltec Heritage" (1980), University of Oklahoma Press
- Ferdinand de Saussure, "Course in general linguistics" (2011), Columbia University Press
- Hernández, E., "Vocabulario en lengua castellana y mexicana del fray Alonso de Molina" (1996), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
- Kurt Ross, "Codex Mendoza" (1984), Rgent Books
- María Garibay, A., "Llave del Náhuatl" (1961), Editorial Porrua
- Melgarejo vivanco, J. L., "Totonacapan" (1943), Talleres gráficos del gobierno del Estado
- Mendoza, G. G., "Toponimia Nahuatl en los Codices Azoyu 1 & 2, Un estudio critico" (2008), Publicaciones de la Casa Chata
- Peñafiel, A., "Nomenclatura geográfica de México" (1897), Oficina tipográfica de la FOMENTO
- Quilis, A., "de Fonética y Fonología Españolas" (1964), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
- Rangarker, R. W., "Studies in UtoAztecan grammar, vol. 1" (1977), Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas
- Rangarker, R. W., "Studies in UtoAztecan grammar, vol. 2" (1979), Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas
- Rangarker, R. W., "Studies in UtoAztecan grammar, vol. 3" (1982), Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas
- Rangarker, R. W., "Studies in UtoAztecan grammar, vol. 4" (1984), Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas
- Robelo, C. A., "Diccionario de Aztequismo" (1911), Ediciones Fuente Cultural
- Siméon, R., "Diccinario de la lengua náhuatl o mexicana" (1999), Siglo XXI Editores
- Sullivan, T. D., "Thelma D. Sullivan's compendium of Nahuatl Grammar" (1988), University of Utah Press
- Swadesh, M., "Estudio sobre lengua y cultura" (1960), Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia
- Theodore B. Fernald, "The Athapaskan language" (2000), The Oxford university Press
- Trumbull, J. M., "The Composition of Indian Geographical names, Illustrated from the Algonkin languages" (1870), Press of case, Lockwood & Brainard, Hartford
- Twenty-ninth Annual report of the Bureau of American ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1907-1908, "W. H. Holmes", Washington government printing office, ~ (1916)
- Wolgemuth, C., "Gramática Nahuatl de Mecayapan" (1981), Instituto Lingüístico de Verano México, D.F