본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

후쿠시마 원전사고와 한국의 원전안전정책

The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster and Nuclear Safety Systems in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Exactly 25 years after the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, 11th of March 2011 the Fukushima nuclear accident occurred in Japan and was ranked at level 7 same to the Chernobyl. A Korean and Japanese joint civil survey was conducted around Fukushima on April 13-17. The radiation survey data clearly shows a large hotspot area between 20 km and 50 km radius north and west direction from the accident reactors, with the highest radiation recorded being 55.64 μSv/hr in the air, 99.89 μSv/hr in the surface air, and 36.16 μSv/hr in a car, respectively. 3.65 μSv/hr in the air and 6.89 μSv/hr in the surface air were detected at the playground of an elementary school in Fukushima City. Spring came with full cherry blossoms in Fukushima, but it was silent spring of radiation contamination. Interviews with Fukushima nuclear refugees reveal serious problems about Japanese nuclear safety systems, such as there was no practical evacuation drill within 1-10 km and no plan at all for 10-30 km areas. Several reforms items for Korean nuclear safety system can be suggested: minimization of accident damage, clear separation of regulatory and safety bureaus with a new and independent administrating agency, community participation and agreement regarding the safety system and levels, which is the major concern of 80% Korean. To tackle threats of nuclear disaster in neighboring nations like China, a new position entitled ‘Ambassador for nuclear safety diplomacy’ is highly necessary. The nuclear safety of Korea should no longer be the monopoly of those nuclear engineers and limited technocrats criticized as a ‘nuclear mafia’.

Abstract

Exactly 25 years after the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, 11th of March 2011 the Fukushima nuclear accident occurred in Japan and was ranked at level 7 same to the Chernobyl. A Korean and Japanese joint civil survey was conducted around Fukushima on April 13-17. The radiation survey data clearly shows a large hotspot area between 20 km and 50 km radius north and west direction from the accident reactors, with the highest radiation recorded being 55.64 μSv/hr in the air, 99.89 μSv/hr in the surface air, and 36.16 μSv/hr in a car, respectively. 3.65 μSv/hr in the air and 6.89 μSv/hr in the surface air were detected at the playground of an elementary school in Fukushima City. Spring came with full cherry blossoms in Fukushima, but it was silent spring of radiation contamination. Interviews with Fukushima nuclear refugees reveal serious problems about Japanese nuclear safety systems, such as there was no practical evacuation drill within 1-10 km and no plan at all for 10-30 km areas. Several reforms items for Korean nuclear safety system can be suggested: minimization of accident damage, clear separation of regulatory and safety bureaus with a new and independent administrating agency, community participation and agreement regarding the safety system and levels, which is the major concern of 80% Korean. To tackle threats of nuclear disaster in neighboring nations like China, a new position entitled ‘Ambassador for nuclear safety diplomacy’ is highly necessary. The nuclear safety of Korea should no longer be the monopoly of those nuclear engineers and limited technocrats criticized as a ‘nuclear mafia’.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. Choi YY, "Remembrance for the Future Chornobyl+25, In Nuclear Disaster and Health Threat", Seminar Proceedings, pp.32~ (2011)
  2. Silent Spring in Fukushima & Chernobyl, "Choi YY", ~ (2011)
  3. Ha MN, "International management criteria for radiation exposure of general public, In Fukushima nuclear disaster and Public Health", Symposium Proceedings, pp.53~ (2011)
  4. Choi YY, "Lessons from Fukushima, In Alternatives for Nuclear Safety System in Korea", Symposium Proceedings, pp.11~13 (2011)
  5. "Japanese prime minister order to shut down Hamaoka nuclear reactors"[URL]
  6. "No border for the radiation"[URL]
  7. A Fukushima testimony of a Japanese mother refugee, "UNO Saeko", 13~15 (2011)
  8. Choi YY, "Silent Spring in Fukushima, In Current Issues in Environment and Health", pp.29~30 (2011)
  9. Decision criteria for urgent resident protection (15-1). Act for nuclear facilities protection and radiation disaster prevention, "Korean government", ~
  10. Lee JH, "Tasks for public health protection from the radiation threat, In Fukushima nuclear disaster and Public Health", Symposium Proceedings, pp.65~67 (2011)
  11. "The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Publication 103", Korean version, 69~
  12. "Higher opposition of public opinion against nuclear reactors in Korea- China-Japan"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)