본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일본 후쿠시마 원전사고 이후 원자력정책 변화 한일 비교

A Comparative Study on Trends of Nuclear Policies after Fukushima Nuclear Disaster in Japan

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

There was a big earthquake with a magnitude of 9 on the richter scale on 11th March 2011 in Japan. Along with the disaster, a large scaled tsunami attacked the east coast of Japan, it resulted in the destruction of nuclear power plant. After the crisis, Korea and Japan government modified and amended their related laws and organizations. This article would provide us with implications in amending our legal system for nuclear disaster measures, through the review of Japan's legislation for disasters after fukushima nuclear crisis. First, this article analyzes the important laws and policies of Japan, preventing mechanism of disasters. And then, it reviewes trends of Korean legal system after fukushima nuclear crisis. Finally, the comparative analysis of nuclear policy regimes in Korea and Japan gives us a couple of policy implications as follows. First, to have independence of a agency for nuclear safety regulation, the personal interchange between a agency for nuclear promotion and a agency for nuclear safety regulation must be prohibited. Second, it is needed to relax exemption provisions of nuclear operator in korean law.

Abstract

There was a big earthquake with a magnitude of 9 on the richter scale on 11th March 2011 in Japan. Along with the disaster, a large scaled tsunami attacked the east coast of Japan, it resulted in the destruction of nuclear power plant. After the crisis, Korea and Japan government modified and amended their related laws and organizations. This article would provide us with implications in amending our legal system for nuclear disaster measures, through the review of Japan's legislation for disasters after fukushima nuclear crisis. First, this article analyzes the important laws and policies of Japan, preventing mechanism of disasters. And then, it reviewes trends of Korean legal system after fukushima nuclear crisis. Finally, the comparative analysis of nuclear policy regimes in Korea and Japan gives us a couple of policy implications as follows. First, to have independence of a agency for nuclear safety regulation, the personal interchange between a agency for nuclear promotion and a agency for nuclear safety regulation must be prohibited. Second, it is needed to relax exemption provisions of nuclear operator in korean law.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 김민훈, "한국의 원자력 규제 행정의 변화", 세계행정학술대회 자료집(한국비교정부학회세션)Ⅱ, 2(1) (2014)
  2. 김서용, "후쿠시마 원전사고 이후 세계인의 원자력 수용성 태도변화 분석", 한국정책학회보, 23(3), pp.57~90 (2014), 한국정책학회
  3. 레오 마츠시마, "'후쿠시마 강진원전사고‘에 대응한 일본의 제개정법령분석", 비교법제 연구, 20(3), pp.60~75 (2012), 한국법제연구원
  4. 서혁준, "후쿠시마 원전사고와 국민의 원자력에 대한 부정적 인식", 정부학연구, 19(3), pp.321~361 (2013), 정부학연구소
  5. 원자력 관련법령 체계 개편에 관한 연구, "이상윤", 한국법제연구원, 150~165 (2011)
  6. 차성민, "원자력법의 체계에 관한 입법 정책적 고찰", 법과정책연구, 9(2), pp.625~645 (2009), 한국법정책학회
  7. 원자력법 분법화 방안연구, "한국원자력안전기술원", 한국원자력안전기술원, ~ (1999)
  8. 후쿠시마 사고 그 후 1년, "한국원자력안전기술원", 8~ (2012)
  9. 有林浩二, "原子力損害賠償支援機構法の制定と槪要", ジリスト, 通(1433)
  10. IAEA, "Convention on Nuclear Safety", INFCIRC, 449 (1994)
  11. IAEA, "Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Managemen", INFCIRC, 546 (1997)
  12. Legal and Governmental Infrastructure for Nuclear, Radiation, Radioactive Waste and Transport Safety, "IAEA", ~ (2000)
  13. Rita Rubin, "Nuclear crisis puts evacuation zones under scrutiny", USAToday, ~ (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (32건)