디지털 글쓰기에 대한 중학생의 쓰기 수행 인식 양상 연구
A Study on The Perception of Digital Writing Performance of Middle School Students
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigated the perception of writing performance of 183 middle school students who performed cooperative writing tasks in a digital writing environment. As a result, first, Students' perception of digital collaborative task performance consisted of 'recognition of digital collaborative writing performance process' and 'attitude perception towards digital writing tools'. Second, the students showed a high level of recognition in terms of role performance while participating in the digital collaborative writing task, but male students felt more difficult than female students. Third, a high level of recognition was also shown in relation to data search and selection of digital writing, but this was also found to be more difficult for male students than female students. Fourth, the discourse synthesis performance, which translates information into one's own words, also showed a high level of recognition, but it showed a rather low level when simultaneously inputting the contents represented by one's own. Fifth, although the overall recognition level was high in relation to cooperative peer evaluation and correction, female students were found to perceive more difficulties than male students. Sixth, students positively perceived the convenience of typing and editing in digital writing compared to handwriting, but showed a rather low level of confidence when entering the content they represented at the same time.
Abstract
This study investigated the perception of writing performance of 183 middle school students who performed cooperative writing tasks in a digital writing environment. As a result, first, Students' perception of digital collaborative task performance consisted of 'recognition of digital collaborative writing performance process' and 'attitude perception towards digital writing tools'. Second, the students showed a high level of recognition in terms of role performance while participating in the digital collaborative writing task, but male students felt more difficult than female students. Third, a high level of recognition was also shown in relation to data search and selection of digital writing, but this was also found to be more difficult for male students than female students. Fourth, the discourse synthesis performance, which translates information into one's own words, also showed a high level of recognition, but it showed a rather low level when simultaneously inputting the contents represented by one's own. Fifth, although the overall recognition level was high in relation to cooperative peer evaluation and correction, female students were found to perceive more difficulties than male students. Sixth, students positively perceived the convenience of typing and editing in digital writing compared to handwriting, but showed a rather low level of confidence when entering the content they represented at the same time.
참고문헌 (53)
- "NAP sample assessment ICT literacy years 6 and 10 November 2018" (2018)[URL]
- Barassi, V., "Does web 3. 0 come after web 2. 0 deconstructing theoretical assumptions through practice", New Media & Society, 14, pp.1269~1285 (2012)
- Beschorner, B., "iPads as a literacy teaching tool in early childhood", International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1, pp.16~24 (2013)
- Boud, D., "Feedback in Higher and Professional Education", pp.1~10 (2013), Routledge
- Carless, D., "The development of student feedback literacy : Enabling uptake of feedback", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43, pp.1315~1325 (2018)
- Connelly, V., "A comparison of keyboarded and handwritten compositions and the relationship with transcription speed", British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, pp.479~492 (2007)[DOI]
- Dahlström, H., "Digital writing tools from the student perspective : Access, affordances, and agency", Education and Information Technologies, 24, pp.1563~1581 (2019)
- Volker, E., "Multimodal literacies : Media affordances, semiotic resources and discourse communities", Journal of Visual Literacy, 39, pp.3~4 (2020)[DOI]
- Preparing for Life in a Digital World: IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study 2018 International report, "Fraillon, J.", IEA, ~ (2019)
- Freeman, A. R., "Keyboarding for students with handwriting problems : A literature review", Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 25, pp.119~147 (2005)[DOI]
- Gamlem, S. M., "Study protocol : DigiHand-the emergence of handwriting skills in digital classrooms", Nordic Journal of Literacy Research, 6, pp.25~41 (2020)
- Genlott, A. A., "Improving literacy skills through learning reading by writing : The iWTR method presented and tested", Computers and Education : An International Journal, 67, pp.98~104 (2013)[DOI]
- Gibson, J. J., "The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception" (1986), Erlbaum
- Hew, K. F., "Designing and implementing e-learning courses : A comparative analysis of policy guidelines from nine professional organizations. International Journal of eEducation, e-Business", e-Management and e-Learning, 3, pp.178~ (2013)
- Heath, V. L., "Elementary Writing Assessment Platforms: A Quantitative Examination of Online Versus Offline Writing Performance of Fifth-Grade Students", doctor, pp.2013
- Hutchby, I., "Affordances and the analysis of technologically mediated interaction : A response to Brian Rappert", Sociology, 37, pp.565~580 (2003)
- IEA international computer and information literacy study: Assessment framework development, "IEA", ~ (2018)
- 주민재, "디지털 문식 환경의 쓰기 양상 변화 요인 고찰", 언어사실과 관점, 45, pp.85~110 (2018), 언어정보연구원[DOI]
- Joo, M. J., "Aspects of digital writing performance in terms of inducibility of digital writing platforms-Focusing on mobile media", The Society of Korean Language Education Conference, 291, pp.59~71 (2019)
- A Study on the Development of Computer-Based Assessment System for Core Competencies(KICE-eAssessment), "Kim, I. S.", KICE, ~, pp.KICE Reseach paper RRE 2019-4 (2019)
- A Study on the Development of Computer-Based Assessment System for Core Competencies(KICE-eAssessment)Ⅱ, "Kim, I. S.", KICE, ~, pp.KICE Reseach paper RRE 2020-8 (2020)
- Kim, J. Y., "A study on digital writers' literacy practices: Focusing on professional blogger's writing process of digital text", doctor, pp.2013
- Kim, H. D., "A study on the contents of education for agency as a digital writer", doctor, pp.2021
- Young-Suk Grace Kim, "Unpacking pathways using the direct and indirect effects model of writing (DIEW) and the contributions of higher order cognitive skills to writing", Reading and Writing, 32(5), pp.1319~1343 (2018), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Kress, G., "The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis", pp.54~67 (2009), Routledge
- Krishnan, J., "Writing together : Online synchronous collaboration in middle school", Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62, pp.163~173 (2018)[DOI]
- Krishnan, J., "Supporting online synchronous collaborative writing in the secondary classroom", Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63, pp.135~145 (2019)
- Lal, R., "Web 3. 0 in education & research", BVICAM's International Journal of Information Technology, 3, pp.335~340 (2011)
- 이순영, "인쇄 텍스트와 디지털 텍스트 문식 활동에 대한 초·중·고등학생들의 인식 연구", 교육종합연구, 11(4), pp.115~136 (2013), 교육종합연구원
- 이지영, "디지털 협력적 글쓰기 효과 연구 － 학생 필자 반응의 양적 분석을 중심으로", 교양교육연구, 11(5), pp.199~234 (2017), 한국교양교육학회
- 이지영, "학생 필자의 디지털 협력적 글쓰기 참여 양상에 따른 글의 질 차이", 작문연구, (39), pp.147~181 (2018), 한국작문학회[DOI]
- Lim M. Y., "A study on writing results and writing style preference in web-based simultaneous cooperative writing situation: Focusing on the use of google docs by middle school students", master, pp.2021
- Charles A. MacArthur, "New Tools for Writing", Topics in Language Disorders, 20(4), pp.85~100 (2000), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- McLean, A. J., "An anatomy of feedback : A phenomenographic investigation of undergraduate students' conceptions of feedback", Studies in Higher Education, 40, pp.921~932 (2015)[DOI]
- Merchant, G., "Writing the future in the digital age", Literacy, 41, pp.118~128 (2007)
- Norman, D. A., "Affordance, conventions, and design", Interactions, 6, pp.38~43 (1999)
- Omid Noroozi, "Gender differences in students’ argumentative essay writing, peer review performance and uptake in online learning environments", Interactive Learning Environments, pp.1~15 (2022), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Omid Noroozi, "Students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing, and content learning: does gender matter?", Interactive Learning Environments, 28(6), pp.698~712 (2018), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- 옥현진, "컴퓨터 글쓰기의 쓰기 교육과정 반영 방안에 관한 사례 연구", 청람어문교육, (41), pp.209~239 (2010), 청람어문교육학회[DOI]
- "What is Web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software" (2005)[URL]
- A Study on the Development of Computer-Based Assessment System for Core Competencies(KICE-eAssessment)Ⅲ, "Park, J", KICE, ~, pp.KICE Reseach paper RRE 2021-9 (2021)
- 서수현, "디지털 문식성 교육을 위한 학습자 프로파일 구성 요소 탐색", 청람어문교육, (52), pp.87~114 (2014), 청람어문교육학회[DOI]
- Skaar, H., "Affordances of writing in digital media in and out of school – Comparing Norwegian 5thgraders’ practices in 2005 and 2017", Nordic Journal of Literacy Research, 6, pp.70~90 (2020)
- Strobl, C., "Affordances of web 2. 0 technologies for collaborative advanced writing in a foreign language", CALICO Journal, 31, pp.1~18 (2014)
- "NAEP Report Card: Technology & Engineering Literacy (TEL): Highlights from the 2018 assessment" (2018)[URL]
- Walsh, M., "The 'textual shift' : Examining the reading process with print; visual and multimodal texts", Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 29, pp.24~ (2006)[DOI]
- Winstone, N. E., "It’d be useful, but I wouldn’t use it : Barriers to university students’ feedback seeking and recipience", Studies in Higher Education, 42, pp.2026~2041 (2017)[DOI]
- Wu, Y., "From feedback to revisions : Effects of feedback features and perceptions", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, pp.101826~ (2020)[DOI]
- Yeh, S., "Scaffolding collaborative technical writing with procedural facilitation & synchronous discussion", Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, pp.397~419 (2011)
- Yim, S., "Cloud-based collaborative writing & the common core standards", Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58, pp.243~254 (2014)
- Yim, S., "Synchronous collaborative writing in the classroom: Undergraduates’ collaboration practices and their impact on writing style, quality, and quantity", Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pp.468~479 (2017), ACM
- Yim, S., "Web-based collaborative writing in L2 contexts : Methodological insights from text mining", Language Learning & Technology, 21, pp.146~165 (2017)
- Yurdabakan, I., "The investigation of peer assessment in primary school cooperative learning groups with respect to gender", Education 3–13, 39, pp.153~169 (2011)[DOI]