본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

동사의 다의성과 구문 의미망 기술에 대하여: 러시아어 동사 ДАТЬ의 이중타동구문을 예로

Polysemy of Verbs and Construction Network: A Case Study of the Ditransitive Construction with the Russian Verb ДАТЬ

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

본 논문에서는 틀의미론과 구문문법의 관점에 따라 어휘의미론의 중심 주제인 다의성에 관해 러시아어 동사 дать ‘주다’를 예로 이중타동구문의 구문 기술을 제안하고 있다. 동사 дать의 전형적인의미는 ‘행위자가 손으로 피의체를 수용자에게 전달하는 것’으로 이중타동구문 구조로 나타난다. 논문에서는 дать 구문의 전형적인 의미가 개념적 은유⋅환유 등의 인지적 기제를 통해 추상적 의미로확장돼 사용되며, 이에 따라 다양한 구문 변화가 나타난다는 것을 코퍼스 용례 분석을 통해 고찰한다. 결과적으로 동사 дать의 다의성은 전형적 의미의 원형적 구문을 중심으로 확장된 추상적 의미, 전이된 의미 등이 구문 상속을 통해 연결된 데 따른 것으로, 방사상의 구문 의미망으로 정의될 수있다.

Abstract

This paper investigates the phenomenon of polysemy in verbs and construction networks through a case study of the ditransitive construction with the Russian verb ДАТЬ (give). The study is conducted within the framework of Frame Semantics and Construction Grammar. In its typical usage, the verb ДАТЬ denotes an action where a person (Agent) transfers control over an object (Patient) to another person (Recipient) using their hands. This conventional meaning extends metaphorically to various constructions, facilitated by cognitive mechanisms such as conceptual metaphor and metonymy. Through a corpus-based analysis, the paper argues that the polysemy of the verb originates from the process of meaning extension in everyday language usage. Consequently, this semantic evolution brings about changes in argument structure, and these changes are linked through construction inheritance from typical to extended usage scenarios. The exploration sheds light on the interconnectedness between different patterns of usage, ranging from conventional to transferred senses.

참고문헌 (59)

  1. 박형익, "동사 ‘주다’의 3가지 용법", 한글, (203) (1989), 한글학회
  2. 이수현, "러시아어 동사 дать의 구문 의미 기술에 관하여", 러시아어문학연구논집, (78), pp.213~235 (2022), 한국러시아문학회[DOI]
  3. 이수현, "경동사 구문 의미와 은유적 의미전이 - 러시아어 동사 ДАТЬ를 중심으로 -", 슬라브硏究, 39(1), pp.255~284 (2023), 러시아연구소[DOI]
  4. 최경봉, "구문과 어휘의미의 상관성 고찰", 國語學, (89), pp.255~283 (2019), 국어학회
  5. 최승권, "한국어와 여러 언어 통합기반 기계-기능동사구문을 중심으로-", 어학연구, 31(1) (1995), 서울대학교 언어교육원
  6. 홍재성, "한국어 자동사", 타동사 구문의 구별과 사전-이른바 동족목적보어 구문의경우-, 1990, pp.3, ~[DOI]
  7. Baker, C. F., "The Structure of the Framenet Database", International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3) (2003)
  8. Benjamin, B, "Light Verbs are Just Regular Verbs", University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 22(1) (2016)
  9. Brugman, C, "Light verbs and polysemy", Language Sciences, 23 (2001)
  10. Dirven, R., "Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast" (2002), Mouton de Gruyter
  11. Feldman, J., "The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis" (2012), Oxford University Press
  12. Fillmore, C, "Language processing in social context" (1989), Elsevier
  13. Fillmore, C, "The mechanisms of ‘Construction Grammar", Proceedings of the 14th Annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society (1988), BLS
  14. Fillmore, C. J, "Linguistics in the Morning Calm I" (1982), Hanshin
  15. "Border conflicts: FrameNet meets Construction Grammar" (2008)[URL]
  16. Fillmore, C. J., "The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis" (2009), Oxford University Press
  17. Goldberg, A, "Constructions : A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
  18. Goldberg, A, "Constructions at work : The Nature of Generalization in Language" (2006), Oxford University Press
  19. Goldberg, A, "The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar" (2013), Oxford University Press
  20. Grimshaw, J., "Light verbs and theta-marking", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(2) (1988)
  21. Haspelmath, M, "Ditransitive Constructions", Annual Review of Linguistics, 1 (2015)
  22. Jesperson, O. A., "A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles: Volume 6" (2007)
  23. Kaschak, M. P., "Constructing meaning : The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension", Journal of Memory and Language, 43 (2000)
  24. Kearns, K, "Light verbs in English", MIT, ~ (2002)
  25. Kövecses, Z, "Language, Mind, and Culture: A Practical Introduction" (2006), Oxford University Press
  26. Lakoff G, "Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind", pp.1987
  27. Lakoff, G., "Metaphors We Live by" (1980), University of Chicago
  28. Langacker, R, "Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction" (2008), Oxford university press
  29. Malchukov, A., "Studies in ditransitive constructions: A comparative handbook" (2010), Mouton de Gruyter
  30. Michael, R, "Metaphor and Thought" (1979), Cambridge University Press
  31. Michaelis, L. A, "The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis" (2009), Oxford University Press
  32. Minsky, M. A, "The psychology of computer vision" (1975), McGraw-Hill Book
  33. Mirjam, Fried, "Construction Grammars in a Cross-language Perspective" (2004), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  34. Podlesskaya, V, "Voice and Grammatical Relations. In Honor of Masayoshi Shibatani" (2006), John Benjamins
  35. Rumelhart, D. E, "Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science" (1975), Academic Press
  36. Ruprecht von Waldenfels, "The Grammaticalization of Give + Infinitive: A Comparative Study of Russian, Polish, and Czech" (2012), De Gruyter Mouton
  37. Sag, Ivan A, "Sign-Based Construction Grammar" (2012), CSLI Publications
  38. Schank, R. C., "Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding" (1977), Erlbaum Associates
  39. Steels, L., "Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar" (2011), John Benjamins
  40. Steels, L., "Computational Issues in Fluid Construction Grammar" (2012), Springer
  41. Sullivan, K., "Frames and Constructions in Metaphoric Language" (2013), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  42. Sweetser, E, "From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure" (1990), Cambridge University Press
  43. Tomica, S., "The give-type benefactive constructions in Korean and Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 26 (2017)
  44. Toops G. H, "Russian da(va)t’ + Infinitive : ‘to give’, ‘to let’, or ‘to have’?", Russian Language Journal, 45 (1991)
  45. Виноградов, В. В, "Основные понятия русской фразеологии как лингвистической дисциплины" (1944), ЛГУ
  46. Виноградов, В. В, "Лексикология и лексикография: Избранные труды" (1977), Наука
  47. "Устойчивые глагольно-именные словосочетания русскогоязыка: Словарь и справочник. 2-е изд" (1979)[URL]
  48. Добровольский, Д. О, "Аспект теории фразеологии" (2008), Знак
  49. Жуков, В. П, "Русская фразеология, Изд. 2-е, испр. и доп" (2006), Высшаяшкола
  50. Кашкин, Е. В, "Семантические роли и сеть конструкцийв системе FrameBank", Компьютерная лингвистика и интеллектуальныетехнологии, 12(19) (2013)
  51. "Большой толковый словарь русского языка"[URL]
  52. Ляшевская, О, "Корпусные инструменты в грамматических исследованияхрусского языка" (2016), Издательский дом ЯСК
  53. "Толковый словарь русского языка. М.:АЗБ., 1949-1992"[URL]
  54. Падучева, Е. В, "Динамические модели в семантике лексики" (2004), Языкиславянской культуры
  55. Подлесская, В. И., "Русские глаголы дать", давать: от прямых употребленийк грамматикализованным, 2005, pp.2, ~
  56. "틀은행 ФреймВанк"[URL]
  57. "프레임넷 FrameNet"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)