이중목적어 동사로의 전성
Ditransitive Verbs Converted from Monotransitive Verbs
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper classifies ditransitive verbs into three semantic groups; the <giving> verb give, <α<giving>> verbs such as pay and teach, <<β>giving> verbs such as mail, buy and make. <<β>giving> verbs are further classified into three semantic groups; <<sending>giving> verbs, <<preparing>giving> verbs, and <<buying>giving> verbs and <<making>giving> verbs. In order to determine why and how specific monotransitive verbs are converted into ditransitive verbs, this paper constructs Idealized Cognitive Model of <giving>, which has three parts; Preconditions “A has X” and “X is useful for H,” Center “A transfer X to H,” and End Point “H has X.” A <making> or <buying> verb can satisfy one of the preconditions to be a <<making>giving> or <<buying>giving> verb respectively by meaning extension based on part-whole metonymy and syntactic conversion following the meaning extension. A <preparing> verb can satisfy the other precondition to be a <<preparing>giving> verb by meaning extension and conversion. A verb in the group of <sending> verbs can satisfy the center to be a <<sending>giving> verb.
Abstract
This paper classifies ditransitive verbs into three semantic groups; the <giving> verb give, <α<giving>> verbs such as pay and teach, <<β>giving> verbs such as mail, buy and make. <<β>giving> verbs are further classified into three semantic groups; <<sending>giving> verbs, <<preparing>giving> verbs, and <<buying>giving> verbs and <<making>giving> verbs. In order to determine why and how specific monotransitive verbs are converted into ditransitive verbs, this paper constructs Idealized Cognitive Model of <giving>, which has three parts; Preconditions “A has X” and “X is useful for H,” Center “A transfer X to H,” and End Point “H has X.” A <making> or <buying> verb can satisfy one of the preconditions to be a <<making>giving> or <<buying>giving> verb respectively by meaning extension based on part-whole metonymy and syntactic conversion following the meaning extension. A <preparing> verb can satisfy the other precondition to be a <<preparing>giving> verb by meaning extension and conversion. A verb in the group of <sending> verbs can satisfy the center to be a <<sending>giving> verb.
참고문헌 (13)
- 송석만, "영어 이중목적어 구문의 의미적ㆍ화용적 분석", 영미어문학연구, 19(1), pp.131~149 (2003), 영미어문학회
- Beavers, J., "An Aspectual Analysis of Ditransitive Verbs of Caused Possession in English", Journal of Semantics, 28(1), pp.1~54 (2011)
- Dirven, R., "Metonymy in Language and Thought", pp.275~288 (1999), Benjamins
- Goldberg, A. E., "Constructions : A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
- Gropen, J., "The Learnability and Acquisition of the Dative Alternation in English", Language, 65, pp.203~257 (1989)
- Harley, H, "Possession and the Double Object Construction", Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 2, pp.31~70 (2003)
- Hudson, R., "So-called Double Objects and Grammatical Relations", Language, 68(2), pp.251~276 (1992)
- Jackendoff, R, "On Larson's Analysis of the Double Object Construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.427~456 (1990)
- Kovecses, Z., "Metonymy: Developing a Cognitive Linguistic View", Cognitive Linguistics, 9, pp.37~77 (1998)
- Lakoff, G., "Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization", pp.63~100 (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Langacker, R. W., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar vol. 2 : Descriptive Application" (1991), Stanford University Press
- Langacker, R. W., "Discourse in Cognitive Grammar", Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), pp.143~188 (2002)
- Pylkkanen, L., "Introducing Arguments", Ph.D., pp.2002