Translation and Linguistic Validation of the Korean Version of the “Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue” Questionnaire for Patients With Overactive Bladder
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The goal of this study was to develop a Korean version of the Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue (BSW) questionnaire from the original version, with subsequent linguistic validation by Korean patients with overactive bladder who undergo active treatment by a physician. Methods: Translation and linguistic validation were performed in January 2013. The validation process included permission for translation, forward translation, reconciliation, backward translation, cognitive debriefing, and proofreading. Results: During the forward translation process, the terms or phrases of ‘benefit,’ ‘willingness,’ “have you had any benefit?,” “taking all things into account” were adjusted to be more appropriate expressions in the Korean language than those used in the original version. During the backward translation process, no changes were made in terms of the sematic equivalence. In the cognitive debriefing session, 5 patients were asked to fill in the answers within 5 minutes; most reported that the translated questions were clear and easy to understand. One patient felt the questions were a little bit difficult to understand; however, the panel decided not to change the expressions because the overall level of comprehension was high and the translated terms were accurate enough to convey the meaning of the original version of the BSW. Conclusions: The present study showed a successful linguistic validation of the BSW questionnaire. Further studies are needed to assess of the psychometric properties of the BSW.
Abstract
Purpose: The goal of this study was to develop a Korean version of the Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue (BSW) questionnaire from the original version, with subsequent linguistic validation by Korean patients with overactive bladder who undergo active treatment by a physician. Methods: Translation and linguistic validation were performed in January 2013. The validation process included permission for translation, forward translation, reconciliation, backward translation, cognitive debriefing, and proofreading. Results: During the forward translation process, the terms or phrases of ‘benefit,’ ‘willingness,’ “have you had any benefit?,” “taking all things into account” were adjusted to be more appropriate expressions in the Korean language than those used in the original version. During the backward translation process, no changes were made in terms of the sematic equivalence. In the cognitive debriefing session, 5 patients were asked to fill in the answers within 5 minutes; most reported that the translated questions were clear and easy to understand. One patient felt the questions were a little bit difficult to understand; however, the panel decided not to change the expressions because the overall level of comprehension was high and the translated terms were accurate enough to convey the meaning of the original version of the BSW. Conclusions: The present study showed a successful linguistic validation of the BSW questionnaire. Further studies are needed to assess of the psychometric properties of the BSW.
참고문헌 (10)
- Veenboer PW, "Long-term adherence to antimuscarinic therapy in everyday practice: a systematic review", J Urol, 191, pp.1003~1008 (2014)
- Sicras-Mainar A, "Antimuscarinic persistence patterns in newly treated patients with overactive bladder: a retrospective comparative analysis", Int Urogynecol J, 25, pp.485~492 (2014)
- Kim TH, "Drug persistence and compliance affect patient-reported outcomes in overactive bladder syndrome", Qual Life Res, 25, pp.2021~2029 (2016)
- Pleil AM, "The validation of patient-rated global assessments of treatment benefit, satisfaction, and willingness to continue--the BSW", Value Health, 8(Suppl 1), pp.S25~S34 (2005)
- Vik Khullar, "Patient-reported outcomes with the β3-adrenoceptor agonist mirabegron in a phase III trial in patients with overactive bladder", Neurourology and Urodynamics, 35(8), pp.987~994 (2016), Wiley-Blackwell[DOI]
- Margolis MK, "Establishing the content validity of the King’s Health Questionnaire in men and women with overactive bladder in the US", Patient, 4, pp.177~187 (2011)
- 오승준, "Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) in a Korean Population", International Neurourology Journal, 16(2), pp.77~85 (2012), 대한배뇨장애요실금학회[DOI]
- Homma Y, "Symptom assessment tool for overactive bladder syndrome--overactive bladder symptom score", Urology, 68, pp.318~323 (2006)
- Homma Y, "Symptom severity and patient perceptions in overactive bladder: how are they related?", BJU Int, 104, pp.968~972 (2009)
- Jiménez MA, "Validation of the Spanish version of the questionnaire «Benefit, satisfaction and willingness to continue the treatment» in patients with overactive bladder", Actas Urol Esp, 37, pp.473~479 (2013)