1920년대 부협의원 선거 유권자대회와 지역 정치의 형성 — 마산과 원산의 사례를 중심으로 —
Convention of Voters for the Election of the Members of Pu-Council[府協議會, Pu-hyopeuhoi] and Formation of Local Politics in the 1920s - Focusing on Masan and Wonsan -
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Koreans in the areas of Masan and Wonsan held the convention of voters for the election of authorized candidates in the election of local council conducted by Japanese Government-General of Joseon in the 1920s. Authorized candidates were elites of economic strength who were the executives of youth council or labor organizations, ex-executives of the organizations leaning towards socialism or men with public service experience. Members of the executive committee for convention of voters were those who had participated in the independence movement to be imprisoned, the executives of youth council, labor organizations and branches of the Shinganhoe. Authorized candidates who were elected as the members of Pu-Council in the areas of Masan and Wonsan had something in common. Firstly, they fought against the Japanese members and the then mayors over the local pending issues resigning en masse and rejecting the budget reviews. Secondly, they actively participated in promoting and securing the interests of Koreans claiming to stand for ‘public interest and welfare of people’. The difference between Wonsan and Masan was that the members of Government Committee in the area of Masan worked through the local pending issues in a close co-operation with the local influentials and the local rising force while the existing native power in the area of Wonsan came into conflict with the local new youth power and the struggles for the initiative within the social movements were exposed even in the election process of Pu-Council. The members of local council kept tabs on what direction Japanese government-general of Joseon would take and aligned themselves with the local Japanese influentials, strongly representing the public opinion of Korean people depending on the issues. They stayed in a traditional power or formed a new power in their region. The local communities had a complex political structure in which Korean, Japanese, and government-general compete with one another depending on the pending issues, which led the authorized candidate-turned members of Pu-Council elected from the convention of voters in the 1920s to secure their own territory and to strengthen the political and economic foundation.
Abstract
Koreans in the areas of Masan and Wonsan held the convention of voters for the election of authorized candidates in the election of local council conducted by Japanese Government-General of Joseon in the 1920s. Authorized candidates were elites of economic strength who were the executives of youth council or labor organizations, ex-executives of the organizations leaning towards socialism or men with public service experience. Members of the executive committee for convention of voters were those who had participated in the independence movement to be imprisoned, the executives of youth council, labor organizations and branches of the Shinganhoe. Authorized candidates who were elected as the members of Pu-Council in the areas of Masan and Wonsan had something in common. Firstly, they fought against the Japanese members and the then mayors over the local pending issues resigning en masse and rejecting the budget reviews. Secondly, they actively participated in promoting and securing the interests of Koreans claiming to stand for ‘public interest and welfare of people’. The difference between Wonsan and Masan was that the members of Government Committee in the area of Masan worked through the local pending issues in a close co-operation with the local influentials and the local rising force while the existing native power in the area of Wonsan came into conflict with the local new youth power and the struggles for the initiative within the social movements were exposed even in the election process of Pu-Council. The members of local council kept tabs on what direction Japanese government-general of Joseon would take and aligned themselves with the local Japanese influentials, strongly representing the public opinion of Korean people depending on the issues. They stayed in a traditional power or formed a new power in their region. The local communities had a complex political structure in which Korean, Japanese, and government-general compete with one another depending on the pending issues, which led the authorized candidate-turned members of Pu-Council elected from the convention of voters in the 1920s to secure their own territory and to strengthen the political and economic foundation.
참고문헌 (69)
- "京城日報", ~
- "東亞日報", ~
- "每日申報", ~
- "時代日報", ~
- "朝鮮時報", ~
- "朝鮮日報", ~
- "中外日報", ~
- "皇城新聞", ~
- "東光", ~
- "開闢", ~
- "改正朝鮮地方制度実施概要", 朝鮮総督府内務局, ~ (1932)
- "公文雑纂", ~
- "官報", ~
- "軍事機密大日記", ~
- 北井波治目, "自叙傳" (1933)
- "東洋文化硏究 4" (2002), 東洋文化硏究所所藏友邦文庫
- 岩崎徂堂, "日本現代富豪名門の家憲" (1908)
- "元山府史年表: 自明治13年至大正3年", 元山府, ~ (1936)
- "第一次統監府統計年報", ~ (1907)
- "第二次統監府統計年報", ~ (1909)
- "第三次統監府統計年報", ~ (1910)
- 阿部薰, "朝鮮功勞者銘鑑", ~ (1935)
- "朝鮮の都邑", 朝鮮總督府, ~ (1930)
- "朝鮮の港湾", 朝鮮総督府内務局土木課, ~ (1925)
- "朝鮮人事興信錄", 朝鮮新聞社, ~ (1935)
- "｢朝鮮靑年會聯合會第5回定期總會開催ノ件｣(京鍾警高秘제4488호의 3)", 檢察行政事務에 關한 記錄1, ~ (1924)
- "朝鮮總督府官報", ~
- "朝鮮總督府及所屬官署職員錄』, 1910∼1943", ~ (1943)
- "朝鮮總督府始政25周年記念表彰者名鑑", ~ (1935)
- "枢密院決議1, 朝鮮教育令中改正ノ件ㆍ大正9年11月3日決議", ~
- "樞密院審査報告", ~
- 坂本正道, "選擧運動新戰術: 附ㆍ普通選擧法令", 東漸社, ~ (1926)
- 片倉製糸紡績株式会社考査課, "片倉製糸紡績株式会社創立二十年紀念写真帖", ~ (1941)
- "被選挙権ニ関スル調査資料", ~
- "한국독립운동사 자료 38 종교운동편", ~
- "咸南名鑑", 北鮮時事新報社, ~ (1934)
- "港湾調査資料 9", 港湾協会, ~ (1931)
- 강만길, "한국사회주의운동인명사전" (1996), 창작과비평사
- 김경일, "일제하 노동운동사" (1992), 창작과 비평사
- 동선희, "식민권력과 조선인 지역유력자-도평의회ㆍ도회의원을 중심으로" (2011), 선인
- 손정목, "韓國地方制度ㆍ自治史硏究 上ㆍ下" (1992), 일지사
- 윤해동, "지배와 자치-식민지기 촌락의 삼국면구조" (2006), 역사비평사
- 姜再鎬, "植民地朝鮮の地方制度" (2001), 東京大學出判會
- 김광운, "원산총파업을 통해 본 노동자조직의 건설문제", 역사와현실, 2 (1989), 한국역사연구회
- 김동명, "1931년 경성부회 선거연구", 한국정치외교사논총, 26(2), pp.193~218 (2005), 한국정치외교사학회
- 김동명, "식민지 조선에서의 부협의회의 정치적 전개 -1929년 경성부 ｢신당리토지문제｣를 중심으로-", 한일관계사연구, (43), pp.543~573 (2012), 한일관계사학회
- 김민철, "일제의 농민조직화 정책과 농가지도(1932~1945)", 역사문제연구, 18 (2007)
- 김익한, "1920년대 일제의 지방지배정책과 그 성격", 한국사연구, 93 (1996)
- 김익한, "1930년대 일제의 지방지배와 면 행정", 한국사론, 37 (1997)
- 박찬승, "근현대 당진지방의 정치사회적 동향과 지역엘리트", 지방사와 지방문화, 7(2), pp.149~212 (2004), 역사문화학회
- 유현, "1920년대 노동운동의 발전과 원산총파업", 사회와 역사, 19 (1990)
- 윤해동, "식민지의회색지대" (2003), 역사비평사
- 이귀원, "1920년대 전반기 마산지역의 민족해방운동", 지역과역사, 1 (1996), 부경역사연구소
- 정연태, "조선말 일제하 資産家型 地方有志의 成長 추구와 利害關係의 中層性 - 浦口商業都市 江景地域 사례 -", 한국문화, (31), pp.289~350 (2003), 규장각한국학연구원
- 지수걸, "일제하 공주지역 유지집단의 도청이전 반대운동", 역사와현실, 20 (1996)
- 지수걸, "일제하 전남 순천지역의 소작인조합운동과 관료-유지지배체제", 한국사연구, 96 (1997)
- 지수걸, "일제의 군국주의 파시즘과 ‘조선농촌진흥운동’", 역사비평, 47 (1999)
- 지수걸, "일제하 충남 서산군의 ‘관료-유지지배체제’ : 서산군지에 대한 분석을 중심으로", 역사문제연구 (1999)
- 지수걸, "近代移行期慶南咸安地域의 社會移動樣相", 한국독립운동사연구, 17 (2001)
- 지수걸, "일제하의 지방통치 시스템과 군 단위 ‘관료-유지 지배체제’ ― 윤해동 저, 지배와 자치(역사비평사, 2006)에 대한 논평 ―", 역사와 현실, (63), pp.345~379 (2007), 한국역사연구회
- 한상구, "일제시기 지역사회의 ‘이중권위구조’에 대한 연구 시론", 역사문제연구소 월례발표회 (2002)
- 허수열, "湖西銀行과 日帝下 朝鮮人 金融業", 지방사와 지방문화, 8(1), pp.105~158 (2005), 역사문화학회
- 허영란, "시가지 개조를 둘러싼 지역주민의 식민지 경험-안성의 철도ㆍ시장ㆍ공원 그리고 지역주민", 역사문제연구, 17 (2007), 역사비평사
- 홍순권, "일제시기 부제의 실시와 지방제도 개정의 추이", 지역과 역사, 0(14), pp.241~281 (2004), 부경역사연구소
- 홍순권, "1910-20년대 부산부협의회의 구성과 지방정치- 협의원의 임명과 선거 실태 분석을 중심으로 -", 역사와경계, (60), pp.177~219 (2006), 부산경남사학회
- 홍순권, "1930년대 부산부회의 의원 선거와 지방 정치세력의 동태", 지방사와 지방문화, 10(1), pp.333~382 (2007), 역사문화학회
- 홍순권, "1920～1930년대 동래의 지방선거와 조선인 당선자들", 한국근현대사연구, (52), pp.109~144 (2010), 한국근현대사학회
- 李昇燁, "全鮮公職者大會 : 1924~1930", 二十世紀硏究, 4 (2003)
- 幷木眞人, "植民地期朝鮮人の政治參加について", 朝鮮史硏究會論文集, 31 (1993)