1930년대 함흥부회와 전주부회의 구성과 활동
Composition and Activities of Hamhungbuhoe and Jeonjubuhoe in the 1930s
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The images of the local politics seen through the operation of the Hamhung and Jeonju parliaments show clear conflicts between the local government and the Japanese Government General of Joseon rather than between Joseon people and Japanese. This is due to the fact that Hamhung and Jeonju were traditional cities and compare to the cities that had grown with the wealth of the early period of Japanese colonial times, the Japanese societies in Hamhung and Jeonju were relatively small, and that the Korean capital and the political and social forces were strong. In these regions, it is relatively easy for the Korean lawmakers to represent the interests of the Koreans, who make up most of the residents, compared to other regions. However, there was not much where their will was carried out in a limited environment that was not actually an autonomous institution. In most cases, it was to the extent that they confirmed the policies that were presented in advance by Myeon, Eup municipal and provincial authorities. Nonetheless, the reason they wanted to advance to the Parliament included the intention to consolidate their socio-economic positions within their region, with the hope that they can play a role in communicating the will of the local people to the authorities. In the 1920s, it was mainly a small number of influential people in both Hamhung and Jeonju district parliament, and since 1930s, new and younger people who do not have government experiences from various occupations had advanced to the parliament. Although it was limited, unlike 1920s, the resolutions were recognized in the 1930s, so more active discussions took place compared to the perfunctory parliament of 1920s. As local youth activists and Shinganhoe activists poured out their remarks during the meetings, the center of the discussion agenda was gradually shifted to the facilities related issues of social policies. They raised a lot of questions about the stability of life below the middle class level. Their criticism of the government also made certain brakes for the regional parliament from becoming the same perfunctory organizations. However, it is also possible to assess that the fact that the councils and municipalities have been changed into resolution making institutes made them hope and led them to overestimate the authority of the councils. They demanded a “real” local autonomy that realizes “ideal” government administration throughout the 1930s, but that conflicted with the line drawn by the Japanese Government General of Joseon, which was impossible from the start. It is also seen that the attempt to intervene with hopes of realizing “public interest” in the institutions created by the Japanese imperialists was expected to be unrealistic from the start.
Abstract
The images of the local politics seen through the operation of the Hamhung and Jeonju parliaments show clear conflicts between the local government and the Japanese Government General of Joseon rather than between Joseon people and Japanese. This is due to the fact that Hamhung and Jeonju were traditional cities and compare to the cities that had grown with the wealth of the early period of Japanese colonial times, the Japanese societies in Hamhung and Jeonju were relatively small, and that the Korean capital and the political and social forces were strong. In these regions, it is relatively easy for the Korean lawmakers to represent the interests of the Koreans, who make up most of the residents, compared to other regions. However, there was not much where their will was carried out in a limited environment that was not actually an autonomous institution. In most cases, it was to the extent that they confirmed the policies that were presented in advance by Myeon, Eup municipal and provincial authorities. Nonetheless, the reason they wanted to advance to the Parliament included the intention to consolidate their socio-economic positions within their region, with the hope that they can play a role in communicating the will of the local people to the authorities. In the 1920s, it was mainly a small number of influential people in both Hamhung and Jeonju district parliament, and since 1930s, new and younger people who do not have government experiences from various occupations had advanced to the parliament. Although it was limited, unlike 1920s, the resolutions were recognized in the 1930s, so more active discussions took place compared to the perfunctory parliament of 1920s. As local youth activists and Shinganhoe activists poured out their remarks during the meetings, the center of the discussion agenda was gradually shifted to the facilities related issues of social policies. They raised a lot of questions about the stability of life below the middle class level. Their criticism of the government also made certain brakes for the regional parliament from becoming the same perfunctory organizations. However, it is also possible to assess that the fact that the councils and municipalities have been changed into resolution making institutes made them hope and led them to overestimate the authority of the councils. They demanded a “real” local autonomy that realizes “ideal” government administration throughout the 1930s, but that conflicted with the line drawn by the Japanese Government General of Joseon, which was impossible from the start. It is also seen that the attempt to intervene with hopes of realizing “public interest” in the institutions created by the Japanese imperialists was expected to be unrealistic from the start.
참고문헌 (38)
- "朝鮮總督府官報", ~
- "朝鮮銀行會社要錄", ~
- "동아일보", ~
- "매일신보", ~
- "중외일보", ~
- "시대일보", ~
- "신한민보", ~
- "매일경제", ~
- "중앙일보", ~
- "조선일보", ~
- "비판", ~
- 朝鮮總督府內務局, "改正朝鮮地方制度實施槪要", ~ (1932)
- 北鮮時事新報社, "咸南名鑑, 咸興" (1934), 北鮮時事新報社
- "함흥부회회의록, 함흥부소화6년도일반경제세입세출예산의건, In 함흥부예산서철", 국가기록원, CJA0002826, ~ (1931)
- "함흥부회회의록, 소화6년도함흥부세입세출추가경정예산의건, In 함흥부예산서철", 국가기록원, CJA0002826, ~ (1931)
- "함흥부회회의록, 소화9년도함흥부세입세출예산, In 함흥부관계서류", 국가기록원, CJA0003005, ~ (1934)
- "함흥부회회의록, 소화10년도함흥부세입출추가경정예산에관한건, In 함흥청진부세입출예산서", 국가기록원, CJA0003096, ~ (1935)
- "제4회 전주부회회의록, 전주부관계서류", 국가기록원, CJA0003190, ~ (1936)
- "제33회 전주부회회의록, 소화15년도전주부세입출예산의건」, In 전주부세입출예산철", 국가기록원, CJA0003526, ~ (1940)
- 강만길, "한국사회주의운동인명사전" (1996), 창작과비평사
- 손정목, "한국지방제도ㆍ자치사연구 상ㆍ하" (1992), 일지사
- 이균영, "신간회연구" (1993), 역사비평사
- 櫻井繁治, "改正市町村制要論追補" (1929), 地方制度研究社
- 美濃部達吉, "議会政治の検討" (1934), 日本評論社
- 杉森孝次郎, "行動政治哲学" (1937), 中央公論社
- 佐佐弘雄, "日本ファッシズムの発展過程" (1932), 浅野書店
- 기유정, "1920년대 경성의 '유지정치'와 경성부협의회", 서울학연구, (28), pp.1~34 (2007), 서울학연구소
- 김동명, "식민지 조선에서의 부협의회의 정치적 전개 -1929년 경성부 「신당리토지문제」를 중심으로-", 한일관계사연구, (43), pp.543~573 (2012), 한일관계사학회
- 김동명, "1931년 경성부회 선거연구", 한국정치외교사논총, 26(2), pp.193~218 (2005), 한국정치외교사학회
- 김윤정, "1920년대 부협의원 선거 유권자대회와 지역 정치의 형성 — 마산과 원산의 사례를 중심으로 —", 사림, (55), pp.205~250 (2016), 수선사학회
- 김제정, "식민지기 ‘지역’과 ‘지역운동’ -1930년대 초반 경성지역을 중심으로-", 서울과 역사, (86), pp.199~229 (2014), 서울역사편찬원
- 염복규, "식민지시기 도시문제를 둘러싼 갈등과 ‘민족적 대립의 정치’ –경성부(협의)회의 ‘청계천 문제’ 논의를 중심으로–", 역사와 현실, (88), pp.243~270 (2013), 한국역사연구회
- 오진석, "1930년대 초 전력산업 公營化運動과 京城電氣", 사학연구, (94), pp.177~216 (2009), 한국사학회
- 홍순권, "일제시기 부제의 실시와 지방제도 개정의 추이", 지역과 역사, 0(14), pp.241~281 (2004), 부경역사연구소
- 홍순권, "1910-20년대 부산부협의회의 구성과 지방정치- 협의원의 임명과 선거 실태 분석을 중심으로 -", 역사와경계, (60), pp.177~219 (2006), 부산경남사학회
- 홍순권, "1930년대 부산부회의 의원 선거와 지방 정치세력의 동태", 지방사와 지방문화, 10(1), pp.333~382 (2007), 역사문화학회
- 홍순권, "1920~1930년대 동래의 지방선거와 조선인 당선자들", 한국근현대사연구, (52), pp.109~144 (2010), 한국근현대사학회
- 美濃部達吉, "議會制度の危機", 中央公論, ~ (1931)
