7세기 『일본서기』 삼국관계 기사의 분석과 백제와 왜의 관계
An analysis of the records of the NihonShoki and Baekje-Japan Relationship in the 7th century
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
An analysis of the records of the NihonShoki was attempted to understand the characteristics of the Baekje-Japan relationship. During the era of King Mu, the relationship with Japan was not given much attention. On the other hand, Shilla shows a more active attitude toward building relationships with Japan, and that effort culminates in Japan’s line of communications with the Tang Dynasty changing to go through Shilla. The number of ambassadors sent by Baekje in the 630s slightly increasing compared to that of the 620s might be a sign of wariness of such a relationship between Shilla and Japan, but even that increase is meager. In the 640s, the first half of King Uija’s era, the NihonShoki specifically records the facts about Shilla’s ambassadors. The entry about Baekje’s ambassador is merely attached to that of Shilla. Out of the three countries, Shilla still led the interactions with Japan during the first half of King Uija’s era, and Baekje only sent ambassadors when there was a major event in Japan. Thus for the first half of the 7th century the relationship between Baekje and Japan has no remarkable characteristics considering the respective countries’ international relations. Despite having a past of Baekje passing on advanced civilization and Japan supplying military assistance at times, their relationship at the time was perfunctory and more of a courteous formality. Such a relationship changed when in the 650s Baekje halted its relationship with the Tang Dynasty and attempted a reorganization of the dynamics of international relations at the time. Japan was an alternative to fill in the relative weakness of the Baekje-Koguryeo alliance compared to the Shilla-Tang forces, and thus the relationship between Baekje and Shilla was transformed. From the general formality it was, it had changed into a relationship with a specific cause, and thus occupied a different place and weight in Baekje’s international relationship.
Abstract
An analysis of the records of the NihonShoki was attempted to understand the characteristics of the Baekje-Japan relationship. During the era of King Mu, the relationship with Japan was not given much attention. On the other hand, Shilla shows a more active attitude toward building relationships with Japan, and that effort culminates in Japan’s line of communications with the Tang Dynasty changing to go through Shilla. The number of ambassadors sent by Baekje in the 630s slightly increasing compared to that of the 620s might be a sign of wariness of such a relationship between Shilla and Japan, but even that increase is meager. In the 640s, the first half of King Uija’s era, the NihonShoki specifically records the facts about Shilla’s ambassadors. The entry about Baekje’s ambassador is merely attached to that of Shilla. Out of the three countries, Shilla still led the interactions with Japan during the first half of King Uija’s era, and Baekje only sent ambassadors when there was a major event in Japan. Thus for the first half of the 7th century the relationship between Baekje and Japan has no remarkable characteristics considering the respective countries’ international relations. Despite having a past of Baekje passing on advanced civilization and Japan supplying military assistance at times, their relationship at the time was perfunctory and more of a courteous formality. Such a relationship changed when in the 650s Baekje halted its relationship with the Tang Dynasty and attempted a reorganization of the dynamics of international relations at the time. Japan was an alternative to fill in the relative weakness of the Baekje-Koguryeo alliance compared to the Shilla-Tang forces, and thus the relationship between Baekje and Shilla was transformed. From the general formality it was, it had changed into a relationship with a specific cause, and thus occupied a different place and weight in Baekje’s international relationship.
참고문헌 (29)
- "三國史記", ~
- "日本書紀", ~
- "舊唐書", ~
- "新唐書", ~
- "冊府元龜", ~
- "唐會要", ~
- 김현구, "일본서기 한국관계기사 연구(Ⅲ)" (2004), 일지사
- 노중국, "백제의 대외 교섭과 교류" (2012), 지식산업사
- 연민수, "역주 일본서기3" (2013), 동북아역사재단
- 山尾幸久, "古代の日朝關係" (1989), 塙書房
- 李成市, "古代東アジアの民族と國家" (1998), 岩波書店
- 坂本太郞, "日本書紀 下" (1975), 岩波書店
- 김수태, "특집논문2 : 백제 의자왕에 대한 재조명 ; 백제 의자왕대의 대왜외교(對倭外交) - 왕족들의 재등장과 관련하여 -", 백제문화, (33), pp.143~158 (2004), 백제문화연구소
- 金恩淑, "日本書紀의 백제관계기사의 기초적 검토", 백제연구, 21 (1990)
- 김은숙, "7세기 동아시아의 국제 관계―수의 등장 이후 백제 멸망까지를 중심으로―", 한일관계사연구, (26), pp.45~93 (2007), 한일관계사학회
- 노중국, "7세기 백제와 왜와의 관계", 국사관논총, 52 (1994)
- 박윤선, "5세기 중반~7세기 백제의 대외관계", 박사, 한국사, pp.2007
- 山尾幸久, "7세기 중엽 동아시아", 백제연구, 23 (1992)
- 송완범, "7世紀의 倭國과 百濟", 일본역사, 686 (2005)
- 延敏洙, "7世紀 東아시아 정세와 倭國의 對韓政策", 신라문화, (24), pp.39~66 (2004), 신라문화연구소
- 연민수, "고대 한일 외교사 -삼국과 왜를 중심으로-", 한국고대사연구, 27, pp.195~256 (2002), 한국고대사학회
- 鈴木靖民, "백제사의 비교연구" (1993)
- 정동준, "7세기 전반 백제의 대외정책", 역사와 현실, (46), pp.37~72 (2002), 한국역사연구회
- 鄭孝雲, "7세기代의 한일관계의 연구 上-백강구전에의 왜국파견 동기를중심으로-", 고고역사학지, 5ㆍ6 (1990)
- 정효운, "7세기 중엽의 백제와 왜", 백제연구, 27 (1997)
- 西嶋定生, "西嶋定生東アジア論集 3" (2002), 岩波書店
- 西本昌弘, "豊璋と翹岐-大化改新前夜の倭國と百濟-", 히스토리아, 107 (1990), 大阪歷史學會
- 鈴木英夫, "大化改新直前の百濟", 續日本紀硏究, 272 (1990)
- 李成市, "高句麗と日隋外交-いわゆる國書問題に關する一試論", 思想, 1990(9) (1990)
