EU의 기후변화협약 대응정책 평가 및 시사점
Climate Change Policies in EU:Prospect and Implication
2
조회
0
다운로드
21
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 EU 주요국의 기후변화협약 대응정책의 분석과 평가를 통하여 향후 점증하는 기후변화관련 사안에 국내 경제주체의 효율적 대응을 위한 시사점을 제시하고자 한다. EU의 기후변화 대응정책은 개별 회원국의 다양한 입장을 고려하는 한편 효율적인 저감수단의 도입 및 확산, 신축성 체제의 강화, 능력 배양 등을 중심으로 진행되어 왔다. 대부분의 EU 국가가 선진국 회원국을 중심으로 구성되어 있어 보다 효율적인 온실가스 저감의무 달성을 위한 정책 수단의 도입을 강조하였다. 특히 배출권 거래제, 공동이행, 청정개발체제 등 신축성 체제의 적극적인 활용을 통하여 회원국의 온실가스 저감비용을 완화하는 노력이 지속되어 왔다. EU 기후변화 대응정책의 국내적 시사점으로는 온실가스 저감 정책에 대한 사전적, 사후적 평가의 강화, 기후변화에 대응하는 정책과 경제, 산업, 외교 등 여타 정책과 연계성 제고를 통한 최적 정책 조합의 구성, 기후변화협약에 대응하는 국내 경제주체의 내부적 합의 도출, 기술협약, 기술이전 및 수용 등 온실가스 저감 기술 및 에너지 이용 및 보전기술 등의 적극적 활용 등이 필요한 것으로 분석된다.
Abstract
This study attempts to analyze the Kyoto Protocol and policy approaches of EU and its major member countries for addressing the threat of global climate change. The paper mainly aims at reviewing climate change response policies and strategies of EU and selected countries, focusing particularly policy histories and the use of the Kyoto mechanisms (Emissions Trading, JI and CDM) and carbon funds. The analytical review and policy recommendations are multi-fold. First, the Korean climate change policies should focus on integrated policy design including socio-economic, industrial, and diplomatic policies as well as climate change policies. Second, the technological cooperation and commercialization of abatement technology will play pivotal roles to cope with challenge of climate change and national competitiveness. Third, it is also important to find optimal policy mix by implementing policy analysis. Finally, since the climate change task is multi-faced, it is evident to establish multi-level governance.
참고문헌 (25)
- Aldy, Joseph E., "A Comparison of Global Climate Change Policy Architectures. RFP Discussion Paper 03-26" (2003), Resource for the Future
- Barrett, S., "Towards a Better Climate Treaty. Policy Matters, 01-29. Washington, DC: AEI Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies", 3(2), pp.35~45 (2001)
- Barrett, S., "Consensus Treaties", Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 158(4), pp.529~547 (2002)
- BMU, "National Allocation Plan 2008-2012 for the Federal Republic of Germany, Federal Ministry for the Environment" (2006), Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety
- Bradford, D.F., "Improving on Kyoto: Greenhouse Gas Control as the Purchase of a Global Public Good" (2002), Princeton University Working Paper
- DEHSt, "Emissions Trading in Germany" (2006), German Emissions Trading Authority at the Federal Environment Agency
- DIW, "Die ?onomischen Kosten des Klimawandels. Wochenbericht 42", 2004 des DIW, http:, www.diw.de, pp.deutsch, produkte[DOI]
- EEA, "Application of the Emissions Trading Directive by EU Member States. Technical Report No. 2", 2006. European Environment Agency, 2006, 2006
- EEA, "Application of the Emissions Trading Directive by EU Member States. Technical Report No. 4", 2007. European Environment Agency, 2007, 2007
- European Commission, "Communication from the Commission on guidance to assist Member States in the implementation of the criteria listed in Annex III to Directive 2003", 87, 61, pp.EC, and on the circumstances under which force majeure is demonstrated, COM (2003)830; Brussels, 2004
- European Commission, "Commission Decision of 29 January 2004 establishing guidelines for the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003", 87, 156, pp.EC, Brussels, 2004[DOI]
- European Commission, "Communication from the Commission on further guidance on allocation plans for the 2008 to 2012 trading period of the EU Emission Trading Scheme, COM (2005)703, Brussels, 2005", ~ (2005)
- European Commission, "The European Climate Change Programme. EU Action against Climate Change. Brochure; Brussels, 2006a", ~
- European Commission, "Report from the Commission - Progress towards achieving the Kyoto objectives (required under Decision 280", 2004, pp.2006, ~
- European Commission, "Commission Decision of 16 January 2007 concerning the national allocation plan for the allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances notified by The Netherlands in accordance with Directive 2003", 87, pp.2007, ~
- European Commission, "Commission Decision of 26 February 2007 concerning the national allocation plan for the allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances notified by Spain in accordance with Directive 2003", 87, ~
- European Commission, "Commission Decision of 15 May 2007 concerning the national allocation plan for the allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances notified by Italy in accordance with Directive 2003", 87, ~
- European Commission, "Commission Decision of 2 April 2007 concerning the national allocation plan for the allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances notified by Austria in accordance with Directive 2003", 87, ~
- Goulder, L. H., "Central Themes and Research Results in Global Climate Change Policy" (2000), Paper prepared for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group III, Third Assessment Report
- Kaivo-oja, Jari, "The European Union balancing between CO2 reduction commitments and growth policies: decomposition analyses", Energy Policy, 32, pp.1511~1530 (2004)
- Nordhaus, W. D., "After Kyoto: Alternative Mechanisms to Control Global Warming" (2002), Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meetings of the Allied Social Science Associations
- Schelling, T. C., "What Makes Greenhouse Sense? Time to Rethink the Kyoto Protocol", Foreign Affairs, 81(3), pp.2~9 (2002)
- UmweltBundesAmt, "Federal Ministry of Environment, Natural Conservation, and Nuclear Safety" (2007), Time to Adapt-Climate Change and the European Water Dimension
- Vesterdala, Morten, "How should greenhouse gas permits be allocated in the EU", Energy Policy, 32, pp.961~968 (2004)
- VROM, "Netherlands National Allocation Plan for Greenhouse Gas Allowances 2008-2012" (2006), Dutch Ministry for Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment