대학 공통 핵심역량 개발 및 타당화 연구
Validation of a Diagnostic Model for Core Competencies at the Higher Education Institute in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a model for diagnosing core competencies at the higher education level. Based on literature reviews, a potential model for core competencies at university was suggested. A tool for validating the model was composed of 24 items, which were delivered to 226 professors and administrative staffs, 730 students, and 134 graduates & external industrial experts. Five constructs (core competencies) were extracted from the data collected among professors and administrative staff responding to the importance of the items. The results of importance and performance surveys on core competencies with students were respectively 3.28 to 3.66 and 2.68 to 3.28 (4-point Likert scale). Statistical differences between importance level and performance level were found in all the sub-categories of core competencies. Borich priority determination formula and Locus for Focus Model were used for the determination of the priority of needs. Importance survey among graduates and external experts showed that the mean of each items ranged from 2.80 to 3.76 (4-point Likert scale). The overall results of the analyses suggest that the final model is appropriate for measuring the core competencies.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a model for diagnosing core competencies at the higher education level. Based on literature reviews, a potential model for core competencies at university was suggested. A tool for validating the model was composed of 24 items, which were delivered to 226 professors and administrative staffs, 730 students, and 134 graduates & external industrial experts. Five constructs (core competencies) were extracted from the data collected among professors and administrative staff responding to the importance of the items. The results of importance and performance surveys on core competencies with students were respectively 3.28 to 3.66 and 2.68 to 3.28 (4-point Likert scale). Statistical differences between importance level and performance level were found in all the sub-categories of core competencies. Borich priority determination formula and Locus for Focus Model were used for the determination of the priority of needs. Importance survey among graduates and external experts showed that the mean of each items ranged from 2.80 to 3.76 (4-point Likert scale). The overall results of the analyses suggest that the final model is appropriate for measuring the core competencies.
참고문헌 (16)
- 박진영, "대학평생교육을 위한 성인대학생 핵심역량모델 개발 및 교육요구도 분석 : 학생-교수간 인식 비교·분석을 중심으로", 한국교육학연구, 20(3), pp.121~158 (2014), 안암교육학회
- Advancing 21st century competencies in South Korea, "H. J. Kim", Center for Global Education, Asia Society, ~ (2017)
- O. Zlatkin-Troitschaskaia, "The international state of research on measurement of competency in higher education", Studies in Higher Education, 40, pp.393~411 (2015)
- H.J.Lee, "Who gets A+ at Seoul National University?" (2014), Dasan
- F.D. Deist, "What Is Competence?", Human Resource Development International, 8(1), pp.27~46 (2005)
- 박보영, "역량기반 치의학교육의 개념과 교육철학적 의미에 대한 고찰 -ADEA의 역량 규정을 중심으로-", 직업능력개발연구, 11(1), pp.215~235 (2008), 한국직업능력연구원[DOI]
- 노혜란, "인적자원개발을 위한 교수 역량(teaching competency) 모델 개발", 직업능력개발연구, 7(2), pp.1~28 (2004), 한국직업능력연구원
- 김동일, "대학 교수가 바라본 고등교육에서의 대학생 핵심역량: 서울대학교 사례를 중심으로", 아시아교육연구, 10(2), pp.195~214 (2009), 교육연구소[DOI]
- R. J. Shavelson, "On an approach to testing and modeling competence", Educational Psychologist, 48(2), pp.73~86 (2013)
- O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, (2016), Springer
- O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, "Measurement Advances and Challenges in Competency Assessment in Higher Education", Journal of Educational Measurement, 53(3), pp.253~264 (2016)
- "The definition and selection of key competencies:Executive summary" (2005)[URL]
- B. Trilling, "21st century skills: Learning for life in our times" (2009), John Wiley & Sons, Inc
- "The Partnership for 21st Century Skills, P21 framework definitions" (2005)[URL]
- "Testing student and university performance globally: OECD's AHELO" (2011)[URL]
- D.Ely, "The diffusion and implementation of educational technology in developing nations: Cross-cultural comparisons of Indonesia, Chile, and Peru", Instructional Development, 1(1), pp.9~12 (1990)