Screw-in forces during instrumentation by various file systems
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the maximum screw-in forces generated during the movement of various Nickel-Titanium (NiTi) file systems. Materials and Methods: Forty simulated canals in resin blocks were randomly divided into 4 groups for the following instruments: Mtwo size 25/0.07 (MTW, VDW GmbH), Reciproc R25 (RPR, VDW GmbH), ProTaper Universal F2 (PTU, Dentsply Maillefer), and ProTaper Next X2 (PTN, Dentsply Maillefer, n = 10). All the artificial canals were prepared to obtain a standardized lumen by using ProTaper Universal F1. Screwin forces were measured using a custom-made experimental device (AEndoS-k, DMJ system) during instrumentation with each NiTi file system using the designated movement. The rotation speed was set at 350 rpm with an automatic 4 mm pecking motion at a speed of 1 mm/sec. The pecking depth was increased by 1 mm for each pecking motion until the file reach the working length. Forces were recorded during file movement, and the maximum force was extracted from the data. Maximum screwin forces were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc comparison at a significance level of 95%. Results: Reciproc and ProTaper Universal files generated the highest maximum screw-in forces among all the instruments while M-two and ProTaper Next showed the lowest (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Geometrical differences rather than shaping motion and alloys may affect the screw-in force during canal instrumentation. To reduce screw-in forces, the use of NiTi files with smaller cross-sectional area for higher flexibility is recommended.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the maximum screw-in forces generated during the movement of various Nickel-Titanium (NiTi) file systems. Materials and Methods: Forty simulated canals in resin blocks were randomly divided into 4 groups for the following instruments: Mtwo size 25/0.07 (MTW, VDW GmbH), Reciproc R25 (RPR, VDW GmbH), ProTaper Universal F2 (PTU, Dentsply Maillefer), and ProTaper Next X2 (PTN, Dentsply Maillefer, n = 10). All the artificial canals were prepared to obtain a standardized lumen by using ProTaper Universal F1. Screwin forces were measured using a custom-made experimental device (AEndoS-k, DMJ system) during instrumentation with each NiTi file system using the designated movement. The rotation speed was set at 350 rpm with an automatic 4 mm pecking motion at a speed of 1 mm/sec. The pecking depth was increased by 1 mm for each pecking motion until the file reach the working length. Forces were recorded during file movement, and the maximum force was extracted from the data. Maximum screwin forces were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc comparison at a significance level of 95%. Results: Reciproc and ProTaper Universal files generated the highest maximum screw-in forces among all the instruments while M-two and ProTaper Next showed the lowest (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Geometrical differences rather than shaping motion and alloys may affect the screw-in force during canal instrumentation. To reduce screw-in forces, the use of NiTi files with smaller cross-sectional area for higher flexibility is recommended.
참고문헌 (27)
- Walia HM, "An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files", J Endod, 14, pp.346~351 (1988)
- Peters OA., "Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review", J Endod, 30, pp.559~567 (2004)
- Sonntag D, "Root canal shaping with manual stainless steel files and rotary Ni-Ti files performed by students", Int Endod J, 36, pp.246~255 (2003)
- Kim HC, "Comparison of forces generated during root canal shaping and residual stresses of three nickel-titanium rotary files by using a three-dimensional finite-element analysis", J Endod, 34, pp.743~747 (2008)
- Kim TO, "Stress distribution of three NiTi rotary files under bending and torsional conditions using a mathematic analysis", Int Endod J, 42, pp.14~21 (2009)
- Kim HC, "Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals", Int Endod J, 42, pp.593~602 (2009)
- Zhang EW, "Influence of crosssectional design and dimension on mechanical behavior of nickel-titanium instruments under torsion and bending: a numerical analysis", J Endod, 36, pp.1394~1398 (2010)
- Versluis A, "Flexural stiffness and stresses in nickel-titanium rotary files for various pitch and cross-sectional geometries", J Endod, 38, pp.1399~1403 (2012)
- Lam PP, "Fracture strength of tooth roots following canal preparation by hand and rotary instrumentation", J Endod, 31, pp.529~532 (2005)
- Kim HC, "Potential relationship between design of nickeltitanium rotary instruments and vertical root fracture", J Endod, 36, pp.1195~1199 (2010)
- 하정홍, "Influence of glide path on the screw-in effect and torque of nickel-titanium rotary files in simulated resin root canals", Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 37(4), pp.215~219 (2012), 대한치과보존학회[DOI]
- Adorno CG, "Crack initiation on the apical root surface caused by three different nickeltitanium rotary files at different working lengths", J Endod, 37, pp.522~525 (2011)
- Diemer F, "Effect of pitch length on the behavior of rotary triple helix root canal instruments", J Endod, 30, pp.716~718 (2004)
- Park H., "A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 91, pp.715~718 (2001)
- Sjogren U, "Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment", J Endod, 16, pp.498~504 (1990)
- "WAVEONE" (2016)[URL]
- Schneider SW., "A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 32, pp.271~275 (1971)
- Kim JW, "Safety of the factory preset rotation angle of reciprocating instruments", J Endod, 40, pp.1671~1675 (2014)
- Shen Y, "Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments", J Endod, 39, pp.163~172 (2013)
- Yum J, "Torsional strength and toughness of nickel-titanium rotary files", J Endod, 37, pp.382~386 (2011)
- Gambarini G, "Mechanical properties of nickeltitanium rotary instruments produced with a new manufacturing technique", Int Endod J, 44, pp.337~341 (2011)
- Kim HC, "Stress generation during self-adjusting file movement: minimally invasive instrumentation", J Endod, 39, pp.1572~1575 (2013)
- Ha JH, "'Screw-in' tendency of rotary nickel-titanium files due to design geometry", Int Endod J, 48, pp.666~672 (2015)
- Elnaghy AM, "Assessment of the mechanical properties of ProTaper Next nickel-titanium rotary files", J Endod, 40, pp.1830~1834 (2014)
- Gao Y, "Evaluation of the impact of raw materials on the fatigue and mechanical properties of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments", J Endod, 38, pp.398~401 (2012)
- Baek SH, "Comparison of torsional stiffness of nickel-titanium rotary files with different geometric characteristics", J Endod, 37, pp.1283~1286 (2011)
- Lee MH, "Correlation between experimental cyclic fatigue resistance and numerical stress analysis for nickeltitanium rotary files", J Endod, 37, pp.1152~1157 (2011)