근대 개화기 번역의 세 가지 경로에 관한 고찰
The study on the three paths of translation in modern Korea.
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In modern times when there were intense contacts between theWestern and Eastern world, translation was a very important tool toaccommodate different cultures and thoughts. At the time, East Asiancountries engaged in translating ‘the West’ in politics, economics andcultures, and this was closely associated with the task of establishingthe identity of a nation. So, the contact between the East and the Westwas made based on the perception of advanced western culture andunderdeveloped oriental culture. Japan actively translated the Westunder the leadership of the government, and became the first to succeedin modernizing among Asian countries through these efforts. In China,the government and intellectuals attempted to translate the Westthrough Chinese Westernized Reform. In contrast, translation of theWest in modern Korea was mainly performed by Western missionariesand intellectuals. The former intended to spread Christianity while thelatter had the purpose of enlightening the people. The intellectuals tookJapan as a model of modernization, resulting in the problem ofretranslating ‘the translated West by Japan’.
Abstract
In modern times when there were intense contacts between theWestern and Eastern world, translation was a very important tool toaccommodate different cultures and thoughts. At the time, East Asiancountries engaged in translating ‘the West’ in politics, economics andcultures, and this was closely associated with the task of establishingthe identity of a nation. So, the contact between the East and the Westwas made based on the perception of advanced western culture andunderdeveloped oriental culture. Japan actively translated the Westunder the leadership of the government, and became the first to succeedin modernizing among Asian countries through these efforts. In China,the government and intellectuals attempted to translate the Westthrough Chinese Westernized Reform. In contrast, translation of theWest in modern Korea was mainly performed by Western missionariesand intellectuals. The former intended to spread Christianity while thelatter had the purpose of enlightening the people. The intellectuals tookJapan as a model of modernization, resulting in the problem ofretranslating ‘the translated West by Japan’.
참고문헌 (20)
- 김병옥, , 구주한국학회(AKSE) 정례학술회의 (1995)
- 김병철, "한국 근대 번역문학사 연구" (1975), 을지문화사
- 김성은, "한일 근대어 성립과 번역― 종교소설 천로역정 번역을 중심으로―", 일본학보, (93), pp.95~105 (2012), 한국일본학회
- 김욱동, "번역과 한국의 근대" (2010), 소명출판
- 민경배, "韓國基督敎會史" (1993), 延世大學校 出版部
- 안종묵, "한국 근대신문,잡지의 발달 시기에 선교사들의 언론활동에 관한 연구", 한국언론학보, 48(2), pp.5~27 (2004), 한국언론학회
- 양세욱, "근대어 성립에서 번역의 역할 ―중국의 사례", 새국어생활, 22(1), pp.37~51 (2012)
- 양일모, "근대 중국의 서양 학문 수용과 번역", 시대와 철학, 15(2), pp.119~152 (2004), 한국철학사상연구회
- 윤영도, "19세기 중엽 관립 번역기구와 근대 언어 공간의 형성", 중국어문학논집, 29(29), pp.265~287 (2004), 중국어문학연구회
- 윤지관, "번역, 무엇이 문제인가; 번역의 정치학", 외국문학 번역과 근대성, 2001, pp.10, 26~47
- 이광린, "한국개화사상사연구" (1992), 일조각
- 이근희, "번역과 한국 및 일본의 근대화", 번역학연구, 8(2), pp.103~132 (2007), 한국번역학회
- 정선태, "근대의 어둠을 응시하는 고양이의 시선 : 번역·문학·사상" (2006), 소명
- "아펜젤러, 최초의 한국 개신교 선교사" (2001), 조병철[URL]
- 채오병, "이행과 번역 - 한국사회의 근대성 이해를 위한 방법론적 소고", 경제와 사회, 89(89), pp.46~70 (2011), 비판사회학회
- 황호덕, "번역과 정통성, 제국의 언어들과 근대 한국어 유비･등가･분기, 영한사전의 계보학", 아세아연구, 54(3), pp.41~97 (2011), 아세아문제연구소
- 황호덕, "개화기 한국의 번역물이 국어에 미친 영향 ―외국인 선교사들이 본 한국의 근대어", 새국어생활, 22(1), pp.5~22 (2012)
- 谭素琴, "近代翻译对中国文化现代性生成的影响研究", 西南科技大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 4, pp.1~4 (2010)
- 邵璐, "会学视角下的中国近代翻译场域", 译苑新谭, pp.35~52 (2010)
- James Scarth Gale., "三千字典" (1924), 朝鮮耶蘇敎書會