국내 공공분야 전문용어 표준화를 위한 해외 선진사례 조사 및 제언
A best practice study and suggestions for the standardization of public-sector terminology in Korea.
2
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper highlights the importance of multilingual terminological standardization, especially in the context of quality control for public translation as an attempt to ensure efficient multinational communication in the public sector. Historical efforts for terminological standardization in Korea have been structured around (a) multilingual standardization primarily in science and technology, and (b) monolingual standardization in the public sector as part of language planning, while much remains to be done in terms of multilingual terminological standardization for the purpose of efficient communication in the public sector. This paper explains why multilingual terminological standardization is needed and explores best practices abroad, centering on the international guidelines and norms from Infoterm and ISO/TC37, the use of IATE and other terminology databases in the context of public translation, and the roles of public agencies in terminological standardization. With these as the basis, this paper describes the current status of and problems with terminological standardization in Korea before providing suggestions for its successful standardization of public-sector terminology.
Abstract
This paper highlights the importance of multilingual terminological standardization, especially in the context of quality control for public translation as an attempt to ensure efficient multinational communication in the public sector. Historical efforts for terminological standardization in Korea have been structured around (a) multilingual standardization primarily in science and technology, and (b) monolingual standardization in the public sector as part of language planning, while much remains to be done in terms of multilingual terminological standardization for the purpose of efficient communication in the public sector. This paper explains why multilingual terminological standardization is needed and explores best practices abroad, centering on the international guidelines and norms from Infoterm and ISO/TC37, the use of IATE and other terminology databases in the context of public translation, and the roles of public agencies in terminological standardization. With these as the basis, this paper describes the current status of and problems with terminological standardization in Korea before providing suggestions for its successful standardization of public-sector terminology.
참고문헌 (15)
- 정책 및 법령 용어 순화 정비 연구, "강현화", 고용노동부, ~ (2010)
- 임현경, "유럽의 전문용어학 연구 현황과 한국의 향후 연구과제", pp.93~122 (2013)
- 임현경, "유럽연합, 벨기에, 스위스, 캐나다의 공공 용어 번역", 새국어생활, 24(2), pp.23~41 (2014)
- 공공번역 표준화의 모델: 한국형 모델 개발을 위한 해외 선진사례 연구, "정호정", 한국문화사, ~ (2013)
- 최혜원, "공공 용어 번역의 현황과 과제", 새국어생활, 24(2), pp.3~22 (2014)
- 한국과학기술원, "21세기 세종계획 전문용어의 정비" (2006), 국립국어원
- Cabré, M., "Theories of terminology: Their descriptiuon, prescription and explanation", Terminology, 9(2), pp.163~199 (2003)
- Drame, A., "Handbook of Terminology, Volume 1", pp.507~519 (2015), John Benjamins
- Directorate D, "DGT Terminology Framework" (2011), European Commission Directorate-General for Translation
- "IATE Indicators 2014 Q3"[URL]
- "Participating EU Institutions and Bodies"[URL]
- "Integrating IATE in Studio: The EP Perspective" (2014)[URL]
- Pavel, S., "The Handbook of Terminology" (2001), Terminology and Standardization Directorate, Translation Bureau
- Rirdance, S., "Towards consolidation of European terminology resources: Experience and Recommendations from EuroTermBank Project" (2006), Tilde
- Guidelines for terminology policies: Formulating and implementing terminology policy in language communities, "UNESCO", UNESCO, ~, pp.CI-2005 (2005), WS[DOI]
