Comparison of mechanical properties of a new fiber reinforced composite and bulk filling composites
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical and physical properties of a newly developed fiber reinforced dental composite. Materials and Methods: Fiber reinforced composite EverX Posterior (EXP, GC EUROPE), and other commercially available bulk fill composites, including Filtek Bulk Fill (FB, 3M ESPE), SonicFill (SF, Kerr Corp.), SureFil (SDR, Dentsply), Venus Bulk Fill (VB, HerausKultzer), Tetric evoceram bulk fill (TECB, Ivoclar Vivadent), and Xtra Base (XB, Voco) were characterized. Composite samples light-cured with a LED device were evaluated in terms of flexural strength, flexural modulus (ISO 4049, n = 6), fracture toughness (n = 6), and Vickers hardness (0, 2, and 4 mm in depth at 24 hr, n = 5). The EXP samples and the fracture surface were observed under a scanning electron microscopy. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and unpaired t-test. Results: EXP, FB, and VB had significantly higher fracture toughness value compared to all the other bulk composite types. SF, EXP, and XB were not statistically different, and had significantly higher flexural strength values compared to other tested composite materials. EXP had the highest flexural modulus, VB had the lowest values. Vickers hardness values revealed SF, EXP, TECB, and XB were not statistically different, and had significantly higher values compared to other tested composite materials. SEM observations show well dispersed fibers working as a reinforcing phase. Conclusions: The addition of fibers to methacrylate-based matrix results in composites with either comparable or superior mechanical properties compared to the other bulk fill materials tested.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical and physical properties of a newly developed fiber reinforced dental composite. Materials and Methods: Fiber reinforced composite EverX Posterior (EXP, GC EUROPE), and other commercially available bulk fill composites, including Filtek Bulk Fill (FB, 3M ESPE), SonicFill (SF, Kerr Corp.), SureFil (SDR, Dentsply), Venus Bulk Fill (VB, HerausKultzer), Tetric evoceram bulk fill (TECB, Ivoclar Vivadent), and Xtra Base (XB, Voco) were characterized. Composite samples light-cured with a LED device were evaluated in terms of flexural strength, flexural modulus (ISO 4049, n = 6), fracture toughness (n = 6), and Vickers hardness (0, 2, and 4 mm in depth at 24 hr, n = 5). The EXP samples and the fracture surface were observed under a scanning electron microscopy. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and unpaired t-test. Results: EXP, FB, and VB had significantly higher fracture toughness value compared to all the other bulk composite types. SF, EXP, and XB were not statistically different, and had significantly higher flexural strength values compared to other tested composite materials. EXP had the highest flexural modulus, VB had the lowest values. Vickers hardness values revealed SF, EXP, TECB, and XB were not statistically different, and had significantly higher values compared to other tested composite materials. SEM observations show well dispersed fibers working as a reinforcing phase. Conclusions: The addition of fibers to methacrylate-based matrix results in composites with either comparable or superior mechanical properties compared to the other bulk fill materials tested.
참고문헌 (29)
- Pallesen U, "Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in Public Dental Health Service: a prospective 8 years follow up", J Dent, 41, pp.297~306 (2013)
- Demarco FF, "Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials", Dent Mater, 28, pp.87~101 (2012)
- Sarrett DC, "Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations", Dent Mater, 21, pp.9~20 (2005)
- Cramer NB, "Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials", J Dent Res, 90, pp.402~416 (2011)
- Ferracane JL, "Resin composite-state of the art", Dent Mater, 27, pp.29~38 (2011)
- Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, "22-Year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics", Dent Mater, 27, pp.955~963 (2011)
- Walter R, "Critical appraisal: bulk-fill flowable composite resins", J Esthet Restor Dent, 25, pp.72~76 (2013)
- Moorthy A, "Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resinbased composite base materials", J Dent, 40, pp.500~505 (2012)
- Ilie N, "Bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance", Oper Dent, 38, pp.618~625 (2013)
- Leprince JG, "Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites", J Dent, 42, pp.993~1000 (2014)
- Ilie N, "Fracture toughness of dental restorative materials", Clin Oral Investig, 16, pp.489~498 (2012)
- El-Safty S, "Creep deformation of restorative resin-composites intended for bulk-fill placement", Dent Mater, 28, pp.928~935 (2012)
- Alshali RZ, "Degree of conversion of bulk-fill compared to conventional resincomposites at two time intervals", Dent Mater, 29, pp.e213~e217 (2013)
- Van Ende A, "Bulk-filling of high C-factor posterior cavities: effect on adhesion to cavitybottom dentin", Dent Mater, 29, pp.269~277 (2013)
- Roggendorf MJ, "Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite", J Dent, 39, pp.643~647 (2011)
- Poggio C, "Surface roughness of flowable resin composites eroded by acidic and alcoholic drinks", J Conserv Dent, 15, pp.137~140 (2012)
- Finan L, "The influence of irradiation potential on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of two bulk-fill flowable RBC base materials", Dent Mater, 29, pp.906~912 (2013)
- Garoushi S, "Physical properties and depth of cure of a new short fiber reinforced composite", Dent Mater, 29, pp.835~841 (2013)
- Heintze SD, "Relevance of in vitro tests of adhesive and composite dental materials, a review in 3parts. Part 1: approval requirements and standardized testing of composite materials according to ISO specifications", Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, 121, pp.804~816 (2011)
- Alander P, "The span length and cross-sectional design affect values of strength", Dent Mater, 21, pp.347~353 (2005)
- Czasch P, "In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.227~235 (2013)
- Xu HH, "Continuous-fiber preform reinforcement of dental resin composite restorations", Dent Mater, 19, pp.523~530 (2003)
- Garoushi S, "Short glass fiber reinforced restorative composite resin with semiinter penetrating polymer network matrix", Dent Mater, 23, pp.1356~1362 (2007)
- Petersen RC, "Discontinuous fiber-reinforced composites above critical length", J Dent Res, 84, pp.365~370 (2005)
- Leprince JG, "New insight into the "depth of cure" of dimethacrylate-based dental composites", Dent Mater, 28, pp.512~520 (2012)
- Flury S, "Depth of cure of resin composites: is the ISO 4049 method suitable for bulk fill materials?", Dent Mater, 28, pp.521~528 (2012)
- Galvão MR, "Evaluation of degree of conversion and hardness of dental composites photo-activated with different light guide tips", Eur J Dent, 7, pp.86~93 (2013)
- Polydorou O, "Evaluation of the curing depth of two translucent composite materials using a halogen and two LED curing units", Clin Oral Investig, 12, pp.45~51 (2008)
- Yap AU, "Influence of light energy density on effectiveness of composite cure", Oper Dent, 26, pp.460~466 (2001)