기업 프레젠테이션의 순차통역 상황에서 연사와 통역사의 손짓의 사용 양상에 대한 비교 고찰
A comparative study of speaker’s and interpreter’s hand gestures during consecutive interpreting – Focusing on the business presentation
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
With the development of machine translation technology, the competitiveness of human interpreter needs to be further strengthened. In light of this, translating nonverbal message is more important than ever. Just like the speakers who make full use of nonverbal communication, interpreter also needs to pay attention to the importance of nonverbal communication. Of all the kinesics, the most frequently used is the hand gesture. The purpose of this paper is to compare and analyze the hand gesture of the speaker and that of the interpreter. For this reason, this paper set two questions. First, what hand the speaker and the interpreter use during consecutive interpreting for business presentation? Second, is the interpreter influenced by the speaker’s hand gesture? What is the difference or similarity between the hand gesture of the speaker and the interpreter? This paper attempts to analyze the hand gestures of both the speaker and the interpreter. The theoretical background for this analysis consists in the types of hand gesture invented by Morris. On the basis of hand gesture, three hand signals are described—deictic signals, baton signals, symbolic signals. The results are as follow: When the speaker and the interpreter explain the content of PowerPoint, they both use deictic signals or baton signals, and when describing specific words, they use similar symbolic signals. It is worth noting that if the speaker’s message is accompanied with hand gesture, the interpreter is ready to interpret the message with the same hand gesture. This means that the speaker's hand gesture influences the hand gesture of the interpreter, thus affecting the formation of message. This paper is limited to one case, so the scope of its research objects needs to be expanded. This paper demonstrates that interpreter uses the similar or different hand gesture as the speaker does and interpreter’s hand gesture would play an active role in the process of interpreting.
Abstract
With the development of machine translation technology, the competitiveness of human interpreter needs to be further strengthened. In light of this, translating nonverbal message is more important than ever. Just like the speakers who make full use of nonverbal communication, interpreter also needs to pay attention to the importance of nonverbal communication. Of all the kinesics, the most frequently used is the hand gesture. The purpose of this paper is to compare and analyze the hand gesture of the speaker and that of the interpreter. For this reason, this paper set two questions. First, what hand the speaker and the interpreter use during consecutive interpreting for business presentation? Second, is the interpreter influenced by the speaker’s hand gesture? What is the difference or similarity between the hand gesture of the speaker and the interpreter? This paper attempts to analyze the hand gestures of both the speaker and the interpreter. The theoretical background for this analysis consists in the types of hand gesture invented by Morris. On the basis of hand gesture, three hand signals are described—deictic signals, baton signals, symbolic signals. The results are as follow: When the speaker and the interpreter explain the content of PowerPoint, they both use deictic signals or baton signals, and when describing specific words, they use similar symbolic signals. It is worth noting that if the speaker’s message is accompanied with hand gesture, the interpreter is ready to interpret the message with the same hand gesture. This means that the speaker's hand gesture influences the hand gesture of the interpreter, thus affecting the formation of message. This paper is limited to one case, so the scope of its research objects needs to be expanded. This paper demonstrates that interpreter uses the similar or different hand gesture as the speaker does and interpreter’s hand gesture would play an active role in the process of interpreting.
참고문헌 (37)
- 권만우, "여성 뉴스 진행자의 비언어적 시자극 요소가 사용자의 뉴스 주목도 및 기억 회상도에 미치는 영향", 디지털디자인학연구, 10(3), pp.165~172 (2010), 한국디지털디자인학회[DOI]
- 권종분, "프랑스어 학습자의 언어·비언어적 의사소통 전략 관찰 및분석", 프랑스문화연구, 8, pp.189~213 (1999)
- 김명주, "방송 연설 후보자의 비언어적 커뮤니케이션이고 저관여 시청자에게 · 미치는 영향: 제17대 국회의원 후보자들의 목소리, 응시, 손동작을 중심으로", 한국방송학보, 19(3), pp.42~103 (2005), 한국방송학회
- 김수정, "한․일 신체언어 비교 연구 －손짓언어를 중심으로－", 언어사실과 관점, 27, pp.93~116 (2011), 언어정보연구원[DOI]
- 김영순, "한국인 손동작의 의미와 화용", 한국어의미학, 6, pp.27~47 (2000)
- 김영순, "손짓 언어의 기호화용론", 언어과학연구, 24, pp.41~60 (2003), 언어과학회
- 김영순, "몸짓 기호와 손동작 언어: 교사-학생 간 비언어 의사소통 연구" (2007), 한국문화사
- 김현강, "제스처" (2017), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 모리스, D., "머리 기른 원숭이: 인간에 관한 개인적 시각" (1996), 까치
- 모리스, D., "피플워칭: 보디랭귀지 연구" (2004), 까치
- 신혜인, "한국교회내 설교통역에 대한 조사연구 : 설교통역의 현황과 특징을 중심으로", 박사, 통역번역학과, pp.2013
- 김현강, "(유학생을 위한) 한국어 대학 글쓰기" (2013), 박이정
- 왕위, "면세점 종업원의 언어⦁비언어 커뮤니케이션이 고객지향성, 고객만족, 고객충성도에 미치는 영향 : 방한 중국인관광객 중심으로", 석사, pp.2016
- 이노미, "문화 간 비언어 커뮤니케이션 인지능력 평가에 관한 비교 문화적 연구 : 한국과 아시아 지역", 박사, 비교문화, pp.2006
- 이노미, "문화 간 비언어 커뮤니케이션에서의 한국과 아시아 지역 손짓언어의 비교 연구", 커뮤니케이션학 연구, 16(2), pp.5~34 (2008), 한국커뮤니케이션학회
- 이노미, "손짓, 그 상식을 뒤엎는 이야기" (2009), 바이북스
- 이노미, "문화 간 비언어 커뮤니케이션 교육 활성화를 위한 시각매체 비교연구 - 중국 손짓언어를 중심으로", 한국영상학회논문집, 14(2), pp.59~74 (2016), 한국영상학회[DOI]
- 이영혜, "비언어의 상호동기화가 커뮤니케이션에 미치는 영향: 음성 언어와 몸짓 언어를 중심으로", 한국소통학보, (25), pp.153~184 (2014), 한국소통학회
- 정은이, "비언어적 커뮤니케이션의 의미와 효과 연구: 홈쇼핑진행자의 비언어적 커뮤니케이션 분석", 한국소통학보, (26), pp.42~84 (2015), 한국소통학회
- 정혜연, "통역학 개론" (2015), 한국문화사
- 최정화, "국제회의 통역사 되는 길" (2001), 한언
- 현은지, "관광통역안내사의 비언어적 커뮤니케이션 능력이 관광객만족과 행동의도에 미치는 영향 - 방한중국인관광객을 중심으로 -", 관광학연구, 40(10), pp.43~59 (2016), 한국관광학회[DOI]
- 홍민표, "한국, 일본, 중국, 미국인의 신체언어에 관한 대조 사회언어학적 연구", 일어일문학연구, 61(1), pp.359~382 (2007), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
- 梁瑞芳, "口译活动中非言语交际的作用", 语言艺术与体育研究, 17(10), pp.331~332 (2017)
- 马桦, "口译中的非言语交际", 乌督木齐成人教育学院学报, 2(1), pp.81~83 (2002)
- Goffman, E., "Forms of talk" (1981), University of Pennsylvania Press
- Kellett, C. J., "Video-aided testing of student delivery and presentation in consecutive interpretation", The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 6, pp.43~66 (1995)
- Krémer, B., "The Routledge Handbook of Translation Studies and Linguistics: Non-verbal communication and interpreting", pp.79~88 (2018), Routledge
- Krystallidou, D., "Non-verbals in dialogue interpreter education:Improving student interpreters’ visual literacy and raising awareness of its impact on interpreting performance" (2017), John Benjamins Publishing
- Lörscher, W., "Translation Performance, Translation Process and Translation Strategies : A psycholinguistic Investigation" (1991), Gunter Narr
- Mireia, V. U., "Coping with nonverbal communication in public service interpreting with chinese immigrants", Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 42(4), pp.340~360 (2013)
- Poyatos, F, "TextConText 2", pp.73~108 (1987), Julius Groos
- Poyatos, F., "Nonverbal Communication and Translation : New Perspectives and challenges in Literature" (1997), John Benjamins
- Rodrigues, I. G, "Translationsqualität. Leipziger Studien zur angewandten Linguistik und Translaktologie", pp.739~753 (2007), Peter Lang
- Bühler, H., "Conference interpreting: A multichannel communication phenomenon", META, 30(1), pp.49~55 (1985)
- "국립국어원 표준국어대사전"[URL]
- "애터미 사업개념 이해 (중국어)" (2019)[URL]