아랍어 무정성 주어 타동사 구문의 한국어 및 중국어 번역 양상 연구 –주어의 변경 양상을 중심으로–
A study on aspects of inanimate subject’s translation from Arabic to Korean and Chinese - Focused on changed inanimate subject -
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Arabic, Korean and Chinese differ in many aspects including linguistic typology classification, sentence structure, etc. which yield difficulties in translation. The purpose of this study is to examine the translation patterns of Arabic transitives including inanimate subject into Korean and Chinese focusing on the Arabic novel, The Bamboo Stalk, and its Korean and Chinese direct translations. Transitive sentences with inanimate subjects were extracted from the Arabic text and divided into two groups: inanimate subjects with animate objects and inanimate subjects with inanimate objects. The findings showed the similarity between Korean and Chinese in the notion of the inanimate subject and the tendency to render the inanimate subjects of Arabic into other sentence components. Specifically, Arabic inanimate subjects were rendered into adverb phrases, predicates, and objects in both Korean and Chinese TT, while the rendition into a complement was only observed in Chinese. Moreover, the syntactic status of an inanimate subject accompanied by an animate object was more likely to be altered (60.9% in Korean, 62.1% in Chinese), in which case, an animate object was upgraded to a subject of the TT, while the transitive clause was rendered into intransitive or passive phrase.
Abstract
Arabic, Korean and Chinese differ in many aspects including linguistic typology classification, sentence structure, etc. which yield difficulties in translation. The purpose of this study is to examine the translation patterns of Arabic transitives including inanimate subject into Korean and Chinese focusing on the Arabic novel, The Bamboo Stalk, and its Korean and Chinese direct translations. Transitive sentences with inanimate subjects were extracted from the Arabic text and divided into two groups: inanimate subjects with animate objects and inanimate subjects with inanimate objects. The findings showed the similarity between Korean and Chinese in the notion of the inanimate subject and the tendency to render the inanimate subjects of Arabic into other sentence components. Specifically, Arabic inanimate subjects were rendered into adverb phrases, predicates, and objects in both Korean and Chinese TT, while the rendition into a complement was only observed in Chinese. Moreover, the syntactic status of an inanimate subject accompanied by an animate object was more likely to be altered (60.9% in Korean, 62.1% in Chinese), in which case, an animate object was upgraded to a subject of the TT, while the transitive clause was rendered into intransitive or passive phrase.
참고문헌 (43)
- 강주헌, "슬럼독 밀리어네어" (2009), 문학동네
- 곽순례, "아-한 번역에서의 품사전환연구", 중동연구, 31(2), pp.157~175 (2012), 중동연구소
- 김명애, "영어 생물주어와 무생물주어의 한국어 번역유형 비교", 석사, 영어영문학, pp.2008
- 김은일, "영어 구사력 향상을 위한 한·영구조에 나타난 유생성차이에 관한 비교연구", 영어교육연구, 9(1), pp.145~164 (1998), 팬코리아영어교육학회
- 김은일, "유생성의 문법", 현대문법연구, 20, pp.71~93 (2000)
- 김은일, "유생성(animacy)이 영한 번역에 미치는 영향", 언어과학, 16(1), pp.23~40 (2009), 한국언어과학회
- 문선희, "무생물주어 타동사구문의 영-한 번역 양상 분석", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2011
- 문연정, "영어권 학습자의 한국어 사동문 습득: 주어의 유정성이 미치는 효과를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2019
- 박미숙, "영한 번역의 주어 번역 양상에 대한 연구", 석사, 응용영어학, pp.2008
- 성백환, "무생물 주어로 시작되는 타동사 문장의 순차번역 전략", 번역학연구, 7(1), pp.105~129 (2006), 한국번역학회
- 신애, "유생성에 따른 영어 타동사 구문의 한국어 번역 유형", 석사, 영어영문학, pp.2011
- 원태식, "한국 중학생의 영어 무생물 주어 타동사 구문 사용에 관한 연구 : 무생물 주어의 원인 자질을 중심으로", 석사, 영어교육전공, pp.2012
- 윤영은, "영어와 한국어의 비유정성 주어 타동사 구문 재고", 언어과학, 21(4), pp.125~148 (2014), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
- 이영옥, "무생물 주어 타동사 구문의 영한 번역", 번역학연구, 2(1), pp.53~76 (2001)
- 이한나, "비유정성 주어 타동사 구문의 영한 번역", 석사, 영어영문학과, pp.2014
- 장영준, "영·한 번역에서의 주어선택과 행위자성", 번역학연구, 10(2), pp.105~132 (2009), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 조인정, "영어권 한국어 학습자의 오류--무정성 주어와 타동사 구문-", 한국어교육, 16(3), pp.331~377 (2005), 국제한국어교육학회
- 최동익, "무생물 주어 구문에 대한 영한 기계 번역 오류분석", 언어학 연구, (29), pp.279~299 (2013), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
- 최성희, "AI시대의 번역: 이론과 실제" (2019), 세창출판사
- Comrie, B., "Language Universals and Linguistic Typology" (1989), The University of Chicago Press
- Croft, W., "Typology and Universals" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Cruse, D. A., "Some Thoughts on Agentivity", Journal of Linguistics, 9, pp.11~23 (1973)
- Dixon, R. M. W., "Ergativity", Language, 55, pp.59~138 (1979)
- Givón, T., "기능영문법 I" (2002), 박이정
- Mohammed Attia, "The Morpho-syntactic Annotation of Animacy for a Dependency Parser", LREC, pp.2607~2615 (2018)
- Muayad Abdul-Halim Ahmad Shamsan, "Inflectional Morphology in Arabic and English : A Contrastive Study", International Journal of English Linguistics, 5(2), pp.139~150 (2015)
- Silverstein, M., "Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages" (1976), Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies
- Swarup, V., "Slumdog Millionaire" (2008), Scribner International
- Yamamoto, M., "Animacy and Reference" (1999), John Benjamins
- شان آبو القاسم الذنب, "من سنن العرب اللغوية درااة تطبيقية تحليلية في كلام العرب بين الحقيفة والمجاز", ٠جلةكليةالتربية, (13), pp.213~223 (2019)
- فاضل صالح السامراني, "الجملة العربية تأليفها وأقسامها ٠ الأردن: دار الفكر ناشرون وموزعون", ~ (2007)
- كمال قادري, "خصائص تطابق النوع بين الفعل والفاعل في اللغة العربية: دراسة في مقتضيات النظام النحوي ومطالب الاستعمال ١للغوي", مجلة العلوم الإذساذية, (3), pp.19~ (2002)
- نيفين سد اكور, "الجنس اللغوي في اللغتين العربية والفارسية دراسة ذثابلية", رسالة العشرق, (33)통권 : 3:4, pp.208~289 (2018)
- 何艳, "略谈无生命名词作主语的句子", 鞍山师范学院学报(综合版), 19(3), pp.25~27 (1998)
- 吴新新, "英语无灵句与汉语有灵句的句法对比以及翻译", 科技文汇, 7, pp.175~176 (2007)
- 张智中, "“无灵主语”与翻译", 英语研究, 2(3, pp.4) (2003), 65~69
- سعود السنعوسي, "ساق البامبو" (2007), الدار. العربية للعلومذاشر-و-ن
- 사우드 알 사누시, "대나무가 자라는 땅" (2019), 훗
- 萨乌德, "竹竿" (2019), 上海文艺出版社
- 이은정, "국어학·언어학 용어사전" (2005), 국어문화사
- احمد مختار ءمر, "معجم اللغة العربية المعاصدرة" (2008), عالم الكتبا
- 夏征农, "大辞海" (2009), 上海辞书出版社
- "국제아랍문학상 홈페이지"[URL]