Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty after Ceramic Bearing Fractures in Patients Under 60-years Old; Mid-term Results
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Although advances in technology have reduced the risk of ceramic implant fractures in total hip arthroplasty, these injuries do occur and their treatment remains challenging. There is a lack of studies reporting on the effectiveness of ceramic components in revision hip arthroplasty after ceramic bearing fracture. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical and radiologic outcomes of revision surgery with ceramic-on-ceramic components after ceramic bearing fractures in young (i.e., under 60 years old) and active patients. Materials and Methods: Eight patients who, from May 2004 to November 2011, underwent ceramic-onceramic revision surgery following a ceramic component fracture and had more than 6 years follow up were enrolled in this study. All eight patients were male with mean ages at first and revision surgeries of 39 years (range, 31-50 years) and 43.8 years (range, 33-60 years), respectively. There were 6 and 2 cases of ceramic liner and ceramic head fractures, respectively. The average time from the first operation to revision surgery was 54.3 months (range, 9-120 months), and the average follow up period was 9.7 years (range, 6-13.3 years). Results: At the last follow up, all patients showed improvement in Harris hip score and pain relief and there were no cases of loosening or osteolysis. Conclusion: Revision total hip arthroplasty using ceramic-on-ceramic components after ceramic component fracture is a feasible and appropriate surgical option in young and active patients.
Abstract
Purpose: Although advances in technology have reduced the risk of ceramic implant fractures in total hip arthroplasty, these injuries do occur and their treatment remains challenging. There is a lack of studies reporting on the effectiveness of ceramic components in revision hip arthroplasty after ceramic bearing fracture. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical and radiologic outcomes of revision surgery with ceramic-on-ceramic components after ceramic bearing fractures in young (i.e., under 60 years old) and active patients. Materials and Methods: Eight patients who, from May 2004 to November 2011, underwent ceramic-onceramic revision surgery following a ceramic component fracture and had more than 6 years follow up were enrolled in this study. All eight patients were male with mean ages at first and revision surgeries of 39 years (range, 31-50 years) and 43.8 years (range, 33-60 years), respectively. There were 6 and 2 cases of ceramic liner and ceramic head fractures, respectively. The average time from the first operation to revision surgery was 54.3 months (range, 9-120 months), and the average follow up period was 9.7 years (range, 6-13.3 years). Results: At the last follow up, all patients showed improvement in Harris hip score and pain relief and there were no cases of loosening or osteolysis. Conclusion: Revision total hip arthroplasty using ceramic-on-ceramic components after ceramic component fracture is a feasible and appropriate surgical option in young and active patients.
참고문헌 (28)
- Karam JA, "Revision total hip arthroplasty in younger patients: indications, reasons for failure and survivorship", Phys Sportsmed, 40, pp.96~101 (2012)[DOI]
- Willert HG, "Reactions of the articular capsule to wear products of artificial joint prostheses", J Biomed Mater Res, 11, pp.157~164 (1977)[DOI]
- Crowther JD, "Survival and polyethylene wear of porous-coated acetabular components in patients less than fifty years old: results at nine to fourteen years", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 84-A, pp.729~735 (2002)
- D'Antonio J, "New experience with alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 17, pp.390~397 (2002)[DOI]
- McAuley JP, "Total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years and younger", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (418), pp.119~125 (2004)
- Skinner HB, "Ceramic bearing surfaces", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (369), pp.83~91 (1999)
- Yoo JJ, "Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. A five-year minimum follow-up study", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87, pp.530~535 (2005)[DOI]
- 한창동, "세라믹-세라믹 조합을 이용한 인공 고관절 전치환술 -최소 5년 추시 결과-", 대한정형외과학회지, 41(3), pp.421~427 (2006), 대한정형외과학회
- 유정준, "40세 미만 활동적인 환자에서 시행한 알루미나-알루미나 고관절 전치환술 -5년 이상 추시 결과-", 대한정형외과학회지, 41(3), pp.404~412 (2006), 대한정형외과학회
- Traina F, "Risk factors for ceramic liner fracture after total hip arthroplasty", HIP Int, 22, pp.607~614 (2012)[DOI]
- Allain J, "Revision total hip arthroplasty performed after fracture of a ceramic femoral head. A multicenter survivorship study", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85-A, pp.825~830 (2003)
- Rambani R, "Revision total hip arthroplasty for fractured ceramic bearings: a review of best practices for revision cases", J Arthroplasty, 32, pp.1959~1964 (2017)[DOI]
- Sharma V, "Revision total hip arthroplasty for ceramic head fracture: a long-term follow-up", J Arthroplasty, 25, pp.342~347 (2010)[DOI]
- Mahomed NN, "The Harris hip score: comparison of patient self-report with surgeon assessment", J Arthroplasty, 16, pp.575~580 (2001)[DOI]
- Koval KJ, "Ambulatory ability after hip fracture. A prospective study in geriatric patients", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (310), pp.150~159 (1995)
- Bands R, "The noncemented porous-coated hip prosthesis. A three-year clinical follow-up study and roentgenographic analysis", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (269), pp.209~219 (1991)
- DeLee JG, "Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (121), pp.20~32 (1976)
- Archibeck MJ, "Alternate bearing surfaces in total joint arthroplasty: biologic considerations", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (379), pp.12~21 (2000)
- Koo KH, "Isolated fracture of the ceramic head after third-generation aluminaon-alumina total hip arthroplasty", JBJS, 90, pp.329~336 (2008)[DOI]
- Ha YC, "Ceramic liner fracture after cementless alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 458, pp.106~110 (2007)
- Poggie RA, "Failure analysis of a ceramic bearing acetabular component", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89, pp.367~375 (2007)[DOI]
- Pulliam IT, "Fracture of a ceramic femoral head after a revision operation. A case report", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 79, pp.118~121 (1997)[DOI]
- Kempf I, "Massive wear of a steel ball head by ceramic fragments in the polyethylene acetabular cup after revision of a total hip prosthesis with fractured ceramic ball", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 109, pp.284~287 (1990)[DOI]
- Matziolis G, "Massive metallosis after revision of a fractured ceramic head onto a metal head", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 123, pp.48~50 (2003)[DOI]
- Garino JP, "Modern ceramic-on-ceramic total hip systems in the United States: early results", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 379, pp.41~47 (2000)[DOI]
- Traina F, "Revision of ceramic hip replacements for fracture of a ceramic component: AAOS exhibit selection", JBJS, 93, pp.e147~ (2011)
- Park YS, "Ceramic failure after total hip arthroplasty with an aluminaon-alumina bearing", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 88, pp.780~787 (2006)
- Hannouche D, "Fractures of ceramic bearings: history and present status", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (417), pp.19~26 (2003)