인도 안과의학의 동아시아 전래와 『용수보살안론(龍樹菩薩眼論)』
On Textual and Contextual Position of The Ophthalmological Treatise of Bodhisattva Nāgārjuna (龍樹菩薩眼論)
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Medical knowledge in India began to be introduced to China in earliest from the Later Han Dynasty period to the times of Wei-Qin and South &North Dynasties(魏晉南北朝). This is proved by many Buddhist medical books(佛醫經) appeared in those days. Of the contents of Indian medicine,the theory of four major elements(四大論) affected Chinese medicine more than did the theory of body fluids. Based on the theory of four major elements that was began to be introduced in Fú shuō fú yī jīng(佛說佛醫經), an attempt to establish a new medical system was made in Zh u hòu b i yīfāng(肘後百一方) written by Táo Hóng-j ng (陶弘景) and Sūn Sī-mi o(孫思邈) who tried to develop etiology further but could not achieve any great outcomes. Unlike the foregoing situation,Indian medicine aroused a large echo in China in the field of ophthalmology with ophthalmological knowledge mentioned in Suśrutasa hitā and ‘Jīnzhēn-shù’(金針術, cataract couching) introduced as a surgical treatment of cataract. The Suśrutasa hitā which is one of the three major texts of Indian medicine contains additional information on surgical operations not introduced in the Carakasa hitā. The technique of cataract surgery was particularly popular in the Tang and Song dynasty periods in China under the name Lóng shù pú sà y n lùn(龍樹菩薩眼論, The Ophthalmological Treatise of Bodhisattva Nāgārjuna) or Lóng shù lùn(龍樹論) and was even designated as a subject to educate medical officers. While the original text of Lóng shù pú sà y n lùn was not handed down,the first testimony that show the trace of the introduction of this text into China was the Tiān zhú jīng lùn y n(天竺經論眼) mentioned in Wài tái mìyào(外臺秘要, Arcane Essential from the Imperial Library) written by Wang Tao(王燾). L ng shàng dào ren(隴上道人) who was mentioned as the compiler of the book is assumed to be Lóng shù. Although Tiān zhú jīng lùn y n introduced anatomical knowledge about the eyeball that could have not been in the traditional Chinese medicine, this book has only limited quantity of information in this regard. Thereafter, Tài píng shèng huì fāng (太平聖惠方, Holy Prescriptions for Universal Relief ) compiled by a national agency at the beginning of the Song Dynasty period introduced Lóng shùpú sà y n lùn without clear indication of the reference. Contemporary with this book, many ophthalmological books such as Mì chuán y n kēlóng mù lùn(秘傳眼科龍木論, Longmu’s Ophthalmology Secretly Handed Down) were published. As Chinese culture was spreading out into surrounding countries,medical knowledge was also introduced to Korean peninsula and Japan. The ophthalmological knowledge contained in Lóng shù pú sà y n lùn was also reflected and some parts of it were introduced in I shin bō(醫心方)in Japan. Based on the policy decision of King Sejong, the fourth king of Joseon Dynasty, large scaled promoting projects of medical knowledge was established. It is notable that the Ui bang ryu chwi (醫方類聚) compiled as a result of the synthesis of the medical treatises available at that time initiated by King Sejong contained a considerable part of Lóng shù pú sà y n lùn in reedited form that had already passed into oblivion in China. The intellectuals in Joseon Dynasty who participated in the compilation of Ui bang ryu chwi not only indicated that Lóng shù pú sà y n lùn was a medical text published in the times of Wei-Qin and South & North Dynasties in China but also clearly indicated the textual reference and left the original text for later generation without modifying the contents. According to the Ui bang ryu chwi, the Lóng shù pú sà y n lùn indicated that the core causes of eye diseases were heat(熱), winds(風), and three body fluids(trido a) and contained the analyses of symptoms, related treatments, and several analyses of wrong treatments. In addition, Lóng shù pú sà y n lùn explained diverse eye diseases through more than 30medical treatments. In particular, this book accurately described golden needle acupuncture for treatment of a Nèi-zhàng(內障) understood to be cataract. Therefore, this book is a significant textual record in the history of ophthalmological medicine in East Asia. Along with the golden needle acupuncture which is a method of removing the crystalline lens in which white turbidity occurred by stabbing the eyeball with a needle, traces of Indian medicine that had been already lost in China were clearly indicated in Lóng shù pú sà y n lùn kept in the Ui bang ryu chwi. In particular, the book indicates that the eyes were directly correlated with the brain and that to treat the internal disorder, treating the brain that lost stability due to heat and bodily wind was indispensable; these are the traces of Indian influence. This textual source demonstrates a case of knowledge exchange in field of medicine with concrete cases of the encounter and clash between the standpoints of understanding human body.
Abstract
Medical knowledge in India began to be introduced to China in earliest from the Later Han Dynasty period to the times of Wei-Qin and South &North Dynasties(魏晉南北朝). This is proved by many Buddhist medical books(佛醫經) appeared in those days. Of the contents of Indian medicine,the theory of four major elements(四大論) affected Chinese medicine more than did the theory of body fluids. Based on the theory of four major elements that was began to be introduced in Fú shuō fú yī jīng(佛說佛醫經), an attempt to establish a new medical system was made in Zh u hòu b i yīfāng(肘後百一方) written by Táo Hóng-j ng (陶弘景) and Sūn Sī-mi o(孫思邈) who tried to develop etiology further but could not achieve any great outcomes. Unlike the foregoing situation,Indian medicine aroused a large echo in China in the field of ophthalmology with ophthalmological knowledge mentioned in Suśrutasa hitā and ‘Jīnzhēn-shù’(金針術, cataract couching) introduced as a surgical treatment of cataract. The Suśrutasa hitā which is one of the three major texts of Indian medicine contains additional information on surgical operations not introduced in the Carakasa hitā. The technique of cataract surgery was particularly popular in the Tang and Song dynasty periods in China under the name Lóng shù pú sà y n lùn(龍樹菩薩眼論, The Ophthalmological Treatise of Bodhisattva Nāgārjuna) or Lóng shù lùn(龍樹論) and was even designated as a subject to educate medical officers. While the original text of Lóng shù pú sà y n lùn was not handed down,the first testimony that show the trace of the introduction of this text into China was the Tiān zhú jīng lùn y n(天竺經論眼) mentioned in Wài tái mìyào(外臺秘要, Arcane Essential from the Imperial Library) written by Wang Tao(王燾). L ng shàng dào ren(隴上道人) who was mentioned as the compiler of the book is assumed to be Lóng shù. Although Tiān zhú jīng lùn y n introduced anatomical knowledge about the eyeball that could have not been in the traditional Chinese medicine, this book has only limited quantity of information in this regard. Thereafter, Tài píng shèng huì fāng (太平聖惠方, Holy Prescriptions for Universal Relief ) compiled by a national agency at the beginning of the Song Dynasty period introduced Lóng shùpú sà y n lùn without clear indication of the reference. Contemporary with this book, many ophthalmological books such as Mì chuán y n kēlóng mù lùn(秘傳眼科龍木論, Longmu’s Ophthalmology Secretly Handed Down) were published. As Chinese culture was spreading out into surrounding countries,medical knowledge was also introduced to Korean peninsula and Japan. The ophthalmological knowledge contained in Lóng shù pú sà y n lùn was also reflected and some parts of it were introduced in I shin bō(醫心方)in Japan. Based on the policy decision of King Sejong, the fourth king of Joseon Dynasty, large scaled promoting projects of medical knowledge was established. It is notable that the Ui bang ryu chwi (醫方類聚) compiled as a result of the synthesis of the medical treatises available at that time initiated by King Sejong contained a considerable part of Lóng shù pú sà y n lùn in reedited form that had already passed into oblivion in China. The intellectuals in Joseon Dynasty who participated in the compilation of Ui bang ryu chwi not only indicated that Lóng shù pú sà y n lùn was a medical text published in the times of Wei-Qin and South & North Dynasties in China but also clearly indicated the textual reference and left the original text for later generation without modifying the contents. According to the Ui bang ryu chwi, the Lóng shù pú sà y n lùn indicated that the core causes of eye diseases were heat(熱), winds(風), and three body fluids(trido a) and contained the analyses of symptoms, related treatments, and several analyses of wrong treatments. In addition, Lóng shù pú sà y n lùn explained diverse eye diseases through more than 30medical treatments. In particular, this book accurately described golden needle acupuncture for treatment of a Nèi-zhàng(內障) understood to be cataract. Therefore, this book is a significant textual record in the history of ophthalmological medicine in East Asia. Along with the golden needle acupuncture which is a method of removing the crystalline lens in which white turbidity occurred by stabbing the eyeball with a needle, traces of Indian medicine that had been already lost in China were clearly indicated in Lóng shù pú sà y n lùn kept in the Ui bang ryu chwi. In particular, the book indicates that the eyes were directly correlated with the brain and that to treat the internal disorder, treating the brain that lost stability due to heat and bodily wind was indispensable; these are the traces of Indian influence. This textual source demonstrates a case of knowledge exchange in field of medicine with concrete cases of the encounter and clash between the standpoints of understanding human body.
참고문헌 (52)
- "備急千金要方", ~
- "聖濟總錄", ~
- 中华中医药学会, "眼科龍木論, In 中医必读百部名著-眼科卷-" (2008), 華夏出版社
- "外臺秘要", ~
- "龍樹菩薩眼論, In 醫方類聚", 東洋醫科大學 重刊本, ~ (1965)
- "醫心方", ~
- "諸病源候論", ~
- "太平聖惠方", ~
- Vaidya Jādavji Trikamji āchārya, "Suśrutasa hitā of Suśruta with the Nibandhasa graha Commentary of Śrī alha āchārya and the Nyāyacandrikā Pañjikā of Śrī Gayadāsāchārya on Nidānasthāna" (1980), Chaukhambha Orientalia
- 김기욱, "아유르베다(Āyurveda)의 醫經에 관한 연구", 대한한의학원전학회지, 20(4), pp.91~118 (2007), 대한한의학원전학회
- 金斗鍾, "韓國醫學史" (1966), 探究堂
- 서지영, "『Susruta-samhita·Sutrasthana(수슈르따-상히따·수뜨라스타나)』의 편역을 통한 'Ayurveda(아유르베다)'에 관한 연구", 박사, 한의학, pp.2010
- 龍樹菩薩眼論, "민족의학신문, 2003년 4월 19일", 2003
- 안상우, "『의방유취』에 대한 의사학적 연구", 박사, 한의학, pp.2000
- 崔桓壽, "『醫方類聚』의 引用書에 관한 연구(1)", 韓國韓醫學硏究院論文集, 3(1) (1997)
- 高健生, "导读《秘传眼科龙木论》", 中国中医眼科杂志, 16(4) (2006)
- 邓来送, "论佛教医药对中医药的影响", 五台山硏究, 1 (2005)
- 馬伯英, "中外醫學文化交流史" (1997), 電波科學社
- 牟洪林, "金针拨障术史略", 天津中医学院学报, 2 (1992)
- 方玲, "古代文化交流与中医药学术之形成", 天津中医学院学报, 23(3) (2004)
- 傅芳, "중국과학기술사(의학편)" (2003), 一中社
- 萧国士, "中医眼科重要著作简介", 广西中医药, 2 (1981)
- 杨鸿, "论《龙树眼论》和印度医学的关系", 湖南中医杂志, 22(6) (2006)
- 杨鸿, "《眼科龙木论》的中医文献硏究", 석사, pp.2007
- 杨鸿, "《眼科龙木论》学术源流硏究", 박사, pp.2010
- 杨鸿, "眼科文献中“龙树”与“龙木”关系考", 江西中医学院学报, 21(1) (2009)
- 杨鸿, "浅议龙树与中医眼科早期文献托名关系", 中国中医眼科杂志, 19(1) (2009)
- 余杨桂, "《秘传眼科龙木论》考", 广州中医药大学学报, 26(4) (2009)
- 余杨桂, "《龙树菩萨眼论》初探", 中国中医眼科杂志, 2(4) (1992)
- 李经纬, "中外医学交流史" (1998), 湖南敎育出版社
- 李倩, "《医方类取》所引中国古代医籍硏究", 석사, pp.2006
- 张凤梅, "论我国第一部眼科手术著作《秘传眼科龙木论》", 中华医史杂志, 35(3) (2005)
- 丁铭, "論佛敎医学与中医学", 福建中医药, 25(2) (1994)
- 陈明, "印度古代医典中的耆婆方", 中华医史杂志, 31(4) (2001)
- 陈明, "汉唐时期于阗的对外医药交流", 歷史硏究, 4 (2008)
- 陈明举, "眼科文献初考", 山东中医学院学报, 4 (1981)
- 陈辉眞, "中国眼科学发展史", 眼科学报, 2(1) (1986)
- 蔡景峰, "唐以前的中印医学交流", 中国科技史料, 7(6) (1986)
- 和中浚, "试论《眼科龙木论》的学术成就", 陕西中医, 7(4) (1986)
- 丹波元胤, "醫籍考" (2007), 學苑出版社
- 酒井シヅ, "病か語る日本史" (2002), 講談社
- 酒井シヅ, "日本の医療史" (1982), 東京書籍
- Deshpande, Vijaya, "Indian Influences on Early Chinese Ophthalmology: Glaucoma as a Case Study", Bulletin of the School of Oriental and Africa Studies, 62(2) (1999), University of London
- Elliot, Robert Henry, "The Indian Operation of Couching for Cataract" (1918), Paul B. Hoeber
- Frauwallner, Erich, "Nachgelassene Werke II: Philosophische Texte Des Hinduismus" (1992), Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
- Kulke, Hermann, "Geschichte Indiens von der Induskultur bis heute" (1998), C.H. Beck
- I-III, "A History of Indian Medical Literature. Groningen Oriental Studies Volume XV", pp.2002, Meulenbeld, G. Jan
- Salguero, C. Pierce, "The Buddhist Medicine King in Literary Context: Reconsidering an Early Medieval Example of Indian influence on Chinese Medicine and Surgery", History of Religions, 48 (2009)
- "Vedic Hinduism"[URL]
- Wujastyk, Dominik, "The Roots of Ayurveda Selections from Sanskrit Medical Writings" (2003), Penguin Books
- Zysk, Kenneth G., "Asceticism and Healing in Ancient India: Medicine in the Buddhist Monastery" (1991), Oxford University Press
- Zysk, Kenneth G., "Medicine in the Veda Religious Healing in the Veda" (1996), Motilal Banarsidass
