신라 승려의 『금광명경』「제병품」 주석을통해 살펴본 한국 고대 불교의학
An Aspect of the History of Medicine in Ancient Korea as Examined through Silla Buddhist Monks’ Annotations on the “Chapter on Eliminating Disease (除病品)” in the Sutra of Golden Light (金光明經, Suvarṇabhāsa-sūtra)
0
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Nearly nothing is known of medicine in ancient Korea due to insufficient materials. With several extant prescriptions and esoteric methods of treating diseases alone, it is impossible to gauge in depth the management of medicine during this period. If one exception were to be cited, that would be the fact that the annotations for understanding the contents on Indian medicine in the “Chapter on Eliminating Disease” in the Sutra of Golden Light, a Buddhist sutra originating from India, reflected the medical knowledge of Buddhist monks from Silla (新羅, 57 BC-935 AD) who were active immediately after the nation’s unification of the two other kingdoms on the Korean Peninsula (668 AD) such as Wonhyo (元曉, 617-686 AD), Gyeongheung (憬興, 620?-700? AD), and Seungjang (勝莊, 684-? AD). Along with those by other monks, these annotations are collected in the Mysterious Pivot of the Sutra of Golden Light (金光明經最勝王經玄樞), which was compiled by Gangyō (願曉, 835-871 AD), a Japanese monk from the Heian era (平安, 794-1185 AD). Representative versions of the “Chapter on Eliminating Disease” in the Sutra of Golden Light include: a classical Chinese translation by the Indian monk Dharmakṣema (曇無讖, 385-433 AD); the eight-volume edition by Chinese monk Baogui (寶貴), which differs little from the preceding work in terms of the contents of the “Chapter on Eliminating Disease”; and the ten-volume edition by Yijing (義淨, 635-713 AD), who had full-fledged knowledge of Indian medicine. When the contents of the annotations thus collected are examined, it seems that Wonhyo had not been aware of the existence of the ten-volume edition, and Gyeongheung and Seungjang most certainly used the ten-volume edition in their annotations as well. Especially noteworthy are Wonhyo’s annotations on the Indian medical knowledge found in the “Chapter on Eliminating Disease” in the Sutra of Golden Light. Here, he made a bold attempt to link and understand consistently even discussions on Indian and Buddhist medicine on the basis of the traditional East Asian medical theory centering on the yin-yang (陰陽) and five phases (五行, wuxing). In accordance with East Asia’s theory of the seasonal five phases, Wonhyo sought to explain aspects of Indian medicine, e.g., changes in the four great elements (四大, catvāri mahā-bhūtāni) of earth, water, fire, and wind according to seasonal factors and their effect on the internal organs; patterns of diseases such as wind (vāta)-induced disease, bile (pitta)-induced disease, phlegm (śleṣman)-induced disease, and a combination (saṃnipāta) of these three types of diseases; pathogenesis due to the indigestion of food, as pathological mechanisms centering on the theory of the mutual overcoming (相克, xiangke) of the five phases including the five viscera (五藏, wuzang), five flavors (五味, wuwei), and five colors (五色, wuse). They existed in the text contents on Indian medicine, which could not be explicated well with the existing medical knowledge based on the theory of the five phases. Consequently, he boldly modified the theory of the five phases in his own way for such passages, thus attempting a reconciliation, or harmonization of disputes (和諍, hwajaeng), of the two medical systems. Such an attempt was even bolder than those by earlier annotators, and Wonhyo’s annotations came to be accepted by later annotators as one persuasive explanation as well. In the case of Gyeongheung and Seungjang, who obtained and examined the ten-volume edition, a new classical Chinese translation produced following Wonhyo’s death, annotated the “Chapter on Eliminating Disease” based on their outstanding proficiency in Sanskrit and knowledge of new Indian and Buddhist medicine. This fact signifies that knowledge of the eight arts (八術) of Ayurvedic medicine in India was introduced into Silla around the early 8th century. The medical knowledge of Wonhyo, Gyeongheung, and Seungjang demonstrates that intellectual circles in contemporary Silla were arenas in which not only traditional East Asian medicine as represented by works such as the Inner Canon of the Yellow Emperor (黃帝內經, Huangdi Neijing) but also Indian medicine of Buddhism coexisted in almost real time.
Abstract
Nearly nothing is known of medicine in ancient Korea due to insufficient materials. With several extant prescriptions and esoteric methods of treating diseases alone, it is impossible to gauge in depth the management of medicine during this period. If one exception were to be cited, that would be the fact that the annotations for understanding the contents on Indian medicine in the “Chapter on Eliminating Disease” in the Sutra of Golden Light, a Buddhist sutra originating from India, reflected the medical knowledge of Buddhist monks from Silla (新羅, 57 BC-935 AD) who were active immediately after the nation’s unification of the two other kingdoms on the Korean Peninsula (668 AD) such as Wonhyo (元曉, 617-686 AD), Gyeongheung (憬興, 620?-700? AD), and Seungjang (勝莊, 684-? AD). Along with those by other monks, these annotations are collected in the Mysterious Pivot of the Sutra of Golden Light (金光明經最勝王經玄樞), which was compiled by Gangyō (願曉, 835-871 AD), a Japanese monk from the Heian era (平安, 794-1185 AD). Representative versions of the “Chapter on Eliminating Disease” in the Sutra of Golden Light include: a classical Chinese translation by the Indian monk Dharmakṣema (曇無讖, 385-433 AD); the eight-volume edition by Chinese monk Baogui (寶貴), which differs little from the preceding work in terms of the contents of the “Chapter on Eliminating Disease”; and the ten-volume edition by Yijing (義淨, 635-713 AD), who had full-fledged knowledge of Indian medicine. When the contents of the annotations thus collected are examined, it seems that Wonhyo had not been aware of the existence of the ten-volume edition, and Gyeongheung and Seungjang most certainly used the ten-volume edition in their annotations as well. Especially noteworthy are Wonhyo’s annotations on the Indian medical knowledge found in the “Chapter on Eliminating Disease” in the Sutra of Golden Light. Here, he made a bold attempt to link and understand consistently even discussions on Indian and Buddhist medicine on the basis of the traditional East Asian medical theory centering on the yin-yang (陰陽) and five phases (五行, wuxing). In accordance with East Asia’s theory of the seasonal five phases, Wonhyo sought to explain aspects of Indian medicine, e.g., changes in the four great elements (四大, catvāri mahā-bhūtāni) of earth, water, fire, and wind according to seasonal factors and their effect on the internal organs; patterns of diseases such as wind (vāta)-induced disease, bile (pitta)-induced disease, phlegm (śleṣman)-induced disease, and a combination (saṃnipāta) of these three types of diseases; pathogenesis due to the indigestion of food, as pathological mechanisms centering on the theory of the mutual overcoming (相克, xiangke) of the five phases including the five viscera (五藏, wuzang), five flavors (五味, wuwei), and five colors (五色, wuse). They existed in the text contents on Indian medicine, which could not be explicated well with the existing medical knowledge based on the theory of the five phases. Consequently, he boldly modified the theory of the five phases in his own way for such passages, thus attempting a reconciliation, or harmonization of disputes (和諍, hwajaeng), of the two medical systems. Such an attempt was even bolder than those by earlier annotators, and Wonhyo’s annotations came to be accepted by later annotators as one persuasive explanation as well. In the case of Gyeongheung and Seungjang, who obtained and examined the ten-volume edition, a new classical Chinese translation produced following Wonhyo’s death, annotated the “Chapter on Eliminating Disease” based on their outstanding proficiency in Sanskrit and knowledge of new Indian and Buddhist medicine. This fact signifies that knowledge of the eight arts (八術) of Ayurvedic medicine in India was introduced into Silla around the early 8th century. The medical knowledge of Wonhyo, Gyeongheung, and Seungjang demonstrates that intellectual circles in contemporary Silla were arenas in which not only traditional East Asian medicine as represented by works such as the Inner Canon of the Yellow Emperor (黃帝內經, Huangdi Neijing) but also Indian medicine of Buddhism coexisted in almost real time.
참고문헌 (87)
- "金光明經", ~
- "金光明經文句", ~
- "金光明經疏", ~
- "金光明最勝王經", ~
- "金光明最勝王經註釋", ~
- "金光明最勝王經玄樞", ~
- "合部金光明經", ~
- "佛說佛醫經", ~
- "三國史記", ~
- 唐愼微, "重修政和經史證類備用本草 影印本", pp.228~229 (1976), 南天書局
- 尙志鈞, "本草經集註", pp.322~ (1994), 人民衛生出版社
- 蛊敬, "新修本草", pp.8~9 (1981), 安徽科彡技欪出版社
- 巢元方, "諸病源候論校注 上", pp.73~ (1991), 人民衛生出版社
- 彔思邈, "崂急千金要方校闅", pp.221~222 (1998), 人民坦生出版社
- 孫思邈, "千金翼方", pp.328~329 (1998), 人民衛生出版社
- 楊上善, "黃帝內經太素校注 上", pp.35~ (2005), 人民衛生出版社
- 熊曼琪, "匟忍辵", pp.237~238 (2000), 人民坦生出版社
- 慧皎, "高僧傳", pp.77~ (1992), 中華書局
- 皇甫塩, "针灸卷", pp.23~25 (2011), 人民坦生出版社
- 金斗鍾, "韓國醫學史", pp.72~74 (1981), 탐구당
- 金斗鍾, "韓國醫學史 上·中世編", pp.62~188 (1955), 정음사
- 金相鉉, "輯逸金光明經疏-金光明最勝王經玄樞 所引 元曉疏의 輯編", 東洋學, 24, pp.259~284 (1994)
- 金相鉉, "輯逸金光明最勝王經憬興疏", 新羅文化, 17, pp.215~254 (2000)
- 김성수, "인도 안과의학의 동아시아 전래와 『용수보살안론(龍樹菩薩眼論)』", 의사학, 22(1), pp.217~274 (2013), 대한의사학회
- 김희정, "몸·국가·우주 하나를 꿈꾸다", pp.287~291 (2008), 궁리
- 박민정, "『金光明經』 「除病品」을 통해 본 韓國佛敎醫學", 석사, 기초한의과학과 의사학전공, pp.2013
- 박태원, "원효, 하나로 만나는 길을 열다", pp.39~40 (2012), 한길사
- 서지영, "Suśruta-samhitā･Sūtrasthāna의 編譯을 통한 Āyurveda에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2010
- 신동원, "호환마마 천연두", pp.282~293 (2013), 돌베게
- 심재관, "2016 티벳대장경역경원 전반기 세미나 및 Jeffrey Hopkins 강연 불교고전어 번역에 대하여", pp.17~19 (2016)
- 심재관, "금광명경, 제병품 세미나 강연 원고", ~ (2016)
- 安啓賢, "勝莊撰金光明最勝王經疏(輯逸)", 佛敎學報, 2, pp.271~304 (1964)
- 安啓賢, "勝莊撰金光明最勝王經疏(輯逸)", 佛敎學報, 3, pp.383~408 (1966)
- 야마다게이지, "중국의학의 기원", pp.11~ (2016), 수퍼노바
- 여인석, "우리나라 고대 불교의학의 한 단면: 원효의 경우", 의사학, 4(2), pp.159~164 (1995)
- 여인석, "삼국시대의 불교교학과 치병활동의 관계", 의사학, 5(2), pp.197~214 (1996)
- 오재근, "水穀의 運化와 배출 -『黃帝內经』을 중심으로-", 대한한의학원전학회지, 21(4), pp.249~260 (2008), 대한한의학원전학회
- 윤창열, "의철학", pp.49~78 (2005), 주민출판사
- 이기운, "『東醫寶鑑』의 四大說 수용과 三敎會通 思想", 불교학보, (53), pp.277~302 (2009), 불교문화연구원
- 이만, "新羅 勝莊의 唯識思想", 불교학보, (59), pp.63~84 (2011), 불교문화연구원
- 이현숙, "5세기 초 신라의사 金武와 의학의 발전", 韓國思想과 文化, 14, pp.88~94 (2001)
- 이현숙, "질병, 치료, 종교∶한국 고대 불교의학", 한국사상과 문화, (48), pp.141~180 (2009), 한국사상문화학회
- 全東赫, "密敎經典의 新羅 傳來考", 中央增伽大學論文集, 8, pp.57~ (1999)
- 정우진, "感應의 哲學", pp.279~307 (2016), 소나무
- 조준호, "경전 상에 나타난 호국불교의 검토", 대각사상, (17), pp.9~41 (2012), 대각사상연구원[DOI]
- 죠셉니담, "中國의 科學과 文明 Ⅱ", pp.327~368 (1986), 乙酉文化社
- 최재석, "日本 正倉院 소장 한약제를 통해본 統一新羅와 日本과의 관계", 民族文化硏究, 26, pp.8~ (1993)
- 韓泰植, "憬興의 生涯에 관한 再考察", 佛敎學報, 28, pp.194~ (1991)
- 顾加栋, "佛敎医学思想研究", pp.6~9 (2014), 科学出版社
- 段逸山, "素駩全元起本硏究刉鎌復", pp.59~ (2001), 上海科彡技欪出版社
- 廖育群, "認識印度傳統醫學", pp.35~43 (2003), 東大圖書股勸有限公司
- 嘓怡, "佛圶芰渥", pp.17~18 (1995), 鸾江出版社
- 林鸣宇, "《金光明经》信仰及其揊法之流传", 佛学研究, pp.170~ (2004)
- 范家偉, "六朝隋唐醫學之傳承與整合" (2004), 中文大學出版社
- 尙志钩, "新修本草", pp.8~9 (1981), 安徽科学技术出版社
- 薛公揬, "儒道佛與中醫藥學" (2002), 中國書店
- 申俊龙, "佛敎四大说对传统医学钱影响", 南京大學學報, 38(3), pp.73~78 (2001)
- 王俊中, "東亞漢藏佛敎史硏究", pp.19~39 (2003), 東大圖書股勸有限公司
- 李良松, "佛醫知識問答", pp.12~ (2014), 學苑出版社
- 周敏惠, "金光明經, 文學特質之硏究", 석사, pp.2003
- 陳明, "印度梵文醫典醫理精華硏究", pp.149~187 (2002), 中華書局
- 陳明, "中古醫療與外來文化", pp.10~ (2013), 北京大學出版社
- 贊寧, "宋高僧傳 上", pp.69~ (1987), 中華書局
- 蔡景峰, "唐以前的中印圶彡交流", 中嫸科技史料, 7(6), pp.16~23 (1986)
- 灟用损, "灟用损全集 1", pp.12~ (2000), 河北人民出版社
- 滑壽, "難經本義" (1995), 人民衛生出版社
- 黃國淸, "『佛說佛醫經』的病因論與養生觀", 世界宗敎學刊, 14, pp.31~50 (2009)
- 黃子瑜, "漢魏兩晉南北朝佛敎醫療觀的傳入與影響", 석사, pp.2016
- 道端良秀, "中國佛敎與社會福利事業", pp.87~ (1986), 佛光文化事業有限公司
- 藤谷厚生, "金光明経の教学史的展開について", 四天王寺国際仏教大学紀要 大学院, 4, pp.1~28 (2005)
- 森立之, "素問放注", pp.216~ (1998), オリエント出版社
- 三木榮, "朝鮮醫學史及疾病史", pp.40~ (1962), 自家出版
- 烏力吉吉日妿拉, "金光明腇の思想的簏究", 박사, pp.2014
- 遠藤次铉, "痰の起源」(1)", 日本圶史彡雜志, 39(3), pp.335~ (1993)
- 二本柳賢司, "佛敎醫學槪要" (1994), 法藏館
- 日野惠運, "義焿踮 『金光明最勝王腇』について", インド哲学仏教学研究, 23, pp.45~48 (2015)
- 川田洋一, "佛敎와 醫學", pp.104~108 (1993), 弘法院
- 丸山敏秋, "黄帝内経と中国古代医学", pp.176~ (1988), 東京美術
- Baker. L. Donald, "The Sourcebook of Buddhism & Medicine, proceeding paper" (2016), Colombia University Press
- Emmerick. R. E, "The Sūtra of Goleden Light", pp.75~76 (1970), Luzac & Company Ltd
- Hino. E, "The Suvarnabhasottamasutra s "Vyadhiprasamana-parivartah"and Ayurveda", Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, 63(3), pp.1271~1275 (2015)
- Nobel. J, "SuvarnabhasottamaSutra" (1937), Otto Harrassowitz
- Salguero. C. Pierce, "Mixing Metaphors: Translating the Indian Medical Doctrine Trido?a in Chinese Buddhist Sources", Asian Medicine, 6, pp.55~71 (2010)
- Salguero. C. Pierce, "On Eliminating Disease: Translation of the Medical Chapter from the Chinese Versions of the Sutra of Golden Light", Journal of Indian Medicine, 6, pp.21~43 (2013)
- Silk. Jonathan A, "SuvarnabhasottamasutraBrill's Encyclopedia of Buddhism, Vol. I", pp.253~255 (2015), Brill
- Skj£erv0. P. O, "The Most Excellent Shine of Gold, King of Kings of Sutras ~ The Khotanese SuvarnabhasottamaSutra" (2004), NELC Havard Univ
- "Susruta, Illustrated Susruta-Samhita. vol. I，K. R. Srikantha Murthy trans", pp.40~ (2016), Chaukhambha Orientalia