본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

약 하나로 병 하나 고치기(用一藥治一病): 『동의보감』 단방의 편찬과 계승

A Single Medicine for a Disease: Simple Formula of Treasured Mirror of Eastern Medicine, It's Compilation and Succession

2

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

In this study, I am planning to analyze the contents of Simple formula (單方) in Treasured Mirror of Eastern Medicine (東醫寶鑑, TM ), and then find out the historical implication of medical science. Simple formula is a prescription that is consisted of a single or three to four kinds of medicines,and this does not follow typical control principles such as 'sovereign,minister, assistant and courier (君臣佐使)'. While simple formulas are often built after major formulas, TM placed simple formulas to an end of each classified item. It is difficult to find a similar compilation style as that of Simple formula among similar volumes of medical books during the same period of TM. Thus, it can be assumed that TM included simple formulas for special purposes or reasons which are deemed as an important factor in stipulating the features of TM. The tradition of Simple formula, using medicinal herbs which can be easily acquired and trying to make an effect with a small number of herbs,had existed before Goryeo (高麗) Dynasty. Introduced by Emergency Prescriptions from the Countryside (鄕藥救急方) and Samhwaja's Formulary from the Countryside (三和子鄕藥方), the tradition of Simple formula is succeeded by Compendium of Prescriptions from the Countryside (鄕藥集成方), and after a while, it is synthetically arranged and recognized through Simple formula of TM. By analyzing simple formulas of TM, I could find out the followings. First, in simple formulas of TM, in which the components are the number of medicinal herbs, the name of prescription, and their application,should be understood as a simply consisted prescription rather than single medicine formulas. Second, simple formulas of TM are 2,001 in total,and are organized in most items. Third, although simple formulas cite a number of formulary, it shows a high degree of dependence to Classified Emergency Materia Medica (證類本草). This shows that simple formulas that are structured to use medicine according to symptoms based on the effect of each medicinal herb, without understanding or dialectic process of syndrome differentiation. Fourth, while the part of medicinal herbs,Decoction section (湯液篇), focuses on listing the information of each medicinal herb, simple formulas introduce effect, dose, volume and even a mix with other medicinal herbs and an application of them. Therefore,a simple formula evaluates single medicinal herb as a sort of prescription. Fifth, more than half of 33 kinds of medicinal herbs, which are used more than 11 times in simple formulas of TM, are easy to get around the village,and their Korean names of Materia Medica from the Countryside (鄕藥) are possible to be seen in Decoction section. However, the fact that Materia Medica from China (唐藥) such as Coptics chinensis (黃連) and Realgar (雄黃) is included in simple formulas means that they are not limited to Materia Medica from the Countryside, and some of Materia Medica from China were not difficult to be procured in the time of publication of TM. Specific purpose of publishing simple formulas is not written separately. However, through the king’s command of King Seonjo (宣祖, 1552-1608)in introduction, the active containing of folk prescriptions (俗方), and the emphasis of medicinal herb's volume using simple formulas, it is assumed that the Chosun (朝鮮) government at that time tried to provide friendly and practical medical information with simple formulas, to collect and formulate private medical experiences in order to expand their extension of medical information, and to maximize the effect of treatment. The compilation system like TM was highly regarded but was also the target of criticism. In particular, King Jeongjo (正祖, 1752-1800) criticized the complicatedness of TM and deleted information related to simple formulas through government compilation medical texts such as Explanation of Subtleties for the People's Longevity (壽民妙詮), New Edition on Universal Relife (濟衆新編). However, simple formulas which were not composed of many medicinal herbs could be useful way for treating people who did not have professional medical knowledge and did not have a large range of herbs. In actuality, Secret Works of Universal Benefit (廣濟秘笈), the representative compilation of civil medicinal text which was published after TM included information related to simple formulas, and in Records for rural life of Chosun gentlemen (林園經濟志), the framework of simple formulas of TM was maintained and is filled with a vast amount of information. Furthermore, cases of utilizing simple formulas are included in the U-Jam's miscellaneous writings (愚岑雜著) which is a clinical record. In Simple formulas of TM, private medical experiences at the time of Chosun are written first, then recognized by the experts, and finally returned to the public. Although the purpose and the target of these simple formulas publication are not clearly known, it is easy found, does not require any advanced medical knowledge, and above all, the people must have welcomed to the supply of economic simple formulas. Therefore,simple formulas show an aspect of TM, as a medical book for public.

Abstract

In this study, I am planning to analyze the contents of Simple formula (單方) in Treasured Mirror of Eastern Medicine (東醫寶鑑, TM ), and then find out the historical implication of medical science. Simple formula is a prescription that is consisted of a single or three to four kinds of medicines,and this does not follow typical control principles such as 'sovereign,minister, assistant and courier (君臣佐使)'. While simple formulas are often built after major formulas, TM placed simple formulas to an end of each classified item. It is difficult to find a similar compilation style as that of Simple formula among similar volumes of medical books during the same period of TM. Thus, it can be assumed that TM included simple formulas for special purposes or reasons which are deemed as an important factor in stipulating the features of TM. The tradition of Simple formula, using medicinal herbs which can be easily acquired and trying to make an effect with a small number of herbs,had existed before Goryeo (高麗) Dynasty. Introduced by Emergency Prescriptions from the Countryside (鄕藥救急方) and Samhwaja's Formulary from the Countryside (三和子鄕藥方), the tradition of Simple formula is succeeded by Compendium of Prescriptions from the Countryside (鄕藥集成方), and after a while, it is synthetically arranged and recognized through Simple formula of TM. By analyzing simple formulas of TM, I could find out the followings. First, in simple formulas of TM, in which the components are the number of medicinal herbs, the name of prescription, and their application,should be understood as a simply consisted prescription rather than single medicine formulas. Second, simple formulas of TM are 2,001 in total,and are organized in most items. Third, although simple formulas cite a number of formulary, it shows a high degree of dependence to Classified Emergency Materia Medica (證類本草). This shows that simple formulas that are structured to use medicine according to symptoms based on the effect of each medicinal herb, without understanding or dialectic process of syndrome differentiation. Fourth, while the part of medicinal herbs,Decoction section (湯液篇), focuses on listing the information of each medicinal herb, simple formulas introduce effect, dose, volume and even a mix with other medicinal herbs and an application of them. Therefore,a simple formula evaluates single medicinal herb as a sort of prescription. Fifth, more than half of 33 kinds of medicinal herbs, which are used more than 11 times in simple formulas of TM, are easy to get around the village,and their Korean names of Materia Medica from the Countryside (鄕藥) are possible to be seen in Decoction section. However, the fact that Materia Medica from China (唐藥) such as Coptics chinensis (黃連) and Realgar (雄黃) is included in simple formulas means that they are not limited to Materia Medica from the Countryside, and some of Materia Medica from China were not difficult to be procured in the time of publication of TM. Specific purpose of publishing simple formulas is not written separately. However, through the king’s command of King Seonjo (宣祖, 1552-1608)in introduction, the active containing of folk prescriptions (俗方), and the emphasis of medicinal herb's volume using simple formulas, it is assumed that the Chosun (朝鮮) government at that time tried to provide friendly and practical medical information with simple formulas, to collect and formulate private medical experiences in order to expand their extension of medical information, and to maximize the effect of treatment. The compilation system like TM was highly regarded but was also the target of criticism. In particular, King Jeongjo (正祖, 1752-1800) criticized the complicatedness of TM and deleted information related to simple formulas through government compilation medical texts such as Explanation of Subtleties for the People's Longevity (壽民妙詮), New Edition on Universal Relife (濟衆新編). However, simple formulas which were not composed of many medicinal herbs could be useful way for treating people who did not have professional medical knowledge and did not have a large range of herbs. In actuality, Secret Works of Universal Benefit (廣濟秘笈), the representative compilation of civil medicinal text which was published after TM included information related to simple formulas, and in Records for rural life of Chosun gentlemen (林園經濟志), the framework of simple formulas of TM was maintained and is filled with a vast amount of information. Furthermore, cases of utilizing simple formulas are included in the U-Jam's miscellaneous writings (愚岑雜著) which is a clinical record. In Simple formulas of TM, private medical experiences at the time of Chosun are written first, then recognized by the experts, and finally returned to the public. Although the purpose and the target of these simple formulas publication are not clearly known, it is easy found, does not require any advanced medical knowledge, and above all, the people must have welcomed to the supply of economic simple formulas. Therefore,simple formulas show an aspect of TM, as a medical book for public.

참고문헌 (64)

  1. "廣濟秘笈", ~
  2. "舊唐書", ~
  3. "東醫寶鑑", ~
  4. "무오연행록", ~
  5. "星湖僿說", ~
  6. "與猶堂全書", ~
  7. "燕巖集", ~
  8. "林園經濟志", ~
  9. "醫方撮要", ~
  10. "濟衆新編", ~
  11. "靑莊館全書", ~
  12. "村家救急方", ~
  13. "太醫院先生案", ~
  14. "弘齋全書", ~
  15. "鄕藥集成方", ~
  16. "승정원일기"[URL]
  17. "한국고전종합DB"[URL]
  18. "조선왕조실록"[URL]
  19. "한국한의학연구원 한의고전명서"[URL]
  20. "漢籍電子文獻資料庫"[URL]
  21. 김대원, "18세기 민간 의료의 성장", 한국사론, 39 (1998)
  22. 김문오, "『東醫寶鑑 湯液篇』 소재 고유어 어휘의 조어법 연구", 언어과학연구, 18 (2000)
  23. 김중권, "東醫寶鑑의 文獻的 硏究", 書誌學硏究, 11 (1995)
  24. 김호, "正祖代 醫療 정책", 韓國學報, 82 (1996)
  25. 김호, "여말선초 ‘鄕藥論’의 형성과 『鄕藥集成方』", 震檀學報, 87 (1999)
  26. 김호, "正祖代의 의료 정책과 ≪濟衆新編≫의 간행", 韓國醫史學會誌, 12(2), pp.117~145 (1999), 한국의사학회
  27. 김호, "허준의 동의보감 연구" (2000), 일지사
  28. 노기춘, "『林園十六志』 引用文獻 分析考(2)", 書誌學硏究, 35 (2006)
  29. 박경련, "동의보감의 國內 및 國外에 있어서의 刊行에 관한 考察", 醫史學, 9(2) (2000)
  30. 서유구, "임원경제지" (2012), 씨앗을 뿌리는 사람
  31. 신동원, "조선사람 허준" (2001), 한겨레신문사
  32. 신동원, "호열자, 조선을 습격하다 : 몸과 의학의 한국사" (2004), 역사비평사
  33. 신동원, "유의儒醫의 길 : 정약용의 의학과 의술", 다산학, (10), pp.171~224 (2007), 재단법인다산학술문화재단
  34. 오세창, "東醫寶鑑에서 單方 민간요법이 주는 의미", 동의생리병리학회지, 20(1), pp.1~9 (2006), 대한동의병리학회
  35. 오재근, "조선 의서 수재 약성가에 대한 연구", 박사, 원전학, pp.2010
  36. 오재근, "『동의보감』과 『향약집성방』의 『증류본초』 활용 - 『향약집성방』 「향약본초」, 『동의보감』 「탕액편」을 중심으로-", 대한한의학원전학회지, 24(5), pp.107~118 (2011), 대한한의학원전학회
  37. 오재근, "조선 의서 『동의보감』은 왜 본초 부문을 「탕액편」이라고 하였을까 : 『동의보감』 「탕액편」 중 이고, 주진형의 본초학 성과 활용 분석", 의사학, 20(2), pp.263~290 (2011), 대한의사학회
  38. 오재근, "『본초강목』이 조선 후기 본초학 발전에 미친 영향 : 미키 사카에의 『임원경제지』 본초학 성과 서술 비판", 의사학, 21(2), pp.193~226 (2012), 대한의사학회
  39. 오재근, "『東醫寶鑑』「湯液篇」의 本草 분류에 대한 연구", 대한한의학원전학회지, 23(5), pp.55~66 (2010), 대한한의학원전학회
  40. 오재근, "조선 후기 『본초강목』의 전래와 그 활용: 『본초정화』, 『본초부방편람』을 중심으로", 의사학, 20(1), pp.29~51 (2011), 대한의사학회
  41. 오재근, "『本草綱目』이 『廣濟秘笈』에 미친 영향 분석 -「鄕藥單方治驗」을 중심으로-", 대한한의학원전학회지, 22(3), pp.337~346 (2009), 대한한의학원전학회
  42. 윤창열, "東醫寶鑑의 編纂動機와 特徵에 對한 考察", 龜岩學報, 4 (1996)
  43. 이경록, "조선 세종대 향약 개발의 두 방향", 태동고전연구, 26, pp.215~250 (2010), 태동고전연구소
  44. 이경록, "고려시대 의료의 형성과 발전" (2010), 혜안
  45. 이규근, "조선 후기 議藥同參 연구", 朝鮮時代史學報, 19 (2001)
  46. 이철용, "동의보감 이본들에 대한 국어학적 고찰", 韓國學論集, 20 (1992)
  47. 장태경, "국역우잠만고·우잠잡저" (2010), 한국한의학연구원
  48. 지명순, "『東醫寶鑑』 單方處方 중 食材料活用에 관한 연구", 大韓韓醫學原典學會誌, 23(1) (2010)
  49. 지창영, "『제중신편』의 의사학적 고찰", 박사, 의사학, pp.2003
  50. 홍문화, "본초학자로서의 허준", 한국과학사학회지, 4(1) (1982)
  51. 홍문화, "한방처방의 통계적 연구(Ⅳ)", 생약학회지, 8(4) (1977)
  52. 홍세영, "왕실의 議藥", 韓國醫史學會誌, 23(1), pp.105~113 (2010), 한국의사학회
  53. 唐愼微, "证类本草" (1993), 人民卫生出版社
  54. 缪希雍, "缪希雍医学全书" (1999), 中国中医药出版社
  55. 马继兴, "中医文献学" (1990), 上海科学技术出版社
  56. 孙思邈, "备急千金要方校释" (1998), 人民卫生出版社
  57. 李时珍, "本草纲目硏究" (2009), 华夏出版社
  58. 李飞, "中医歷代方论精选" (1998), 江苏科学技术出版社
  59. 李梴, "医学入门" (1999), 天津科学技术出版社
  60. 朱华德, "方剂的起源", 山东中医学院学报, 18(3) (1994)
  61. 郑贵力, "七方-方剂最早分类法质疑", 山东中医学院学报, 20(4) (1996)
  62. 崔秀汉, "朝鲜医籍通考" (1996), 中国中医药出版社
  63. 三木榮, "朝鮮醫學史及疾病史" (1962), 自家出版
  64. 森立之, "本草经攷注" (2005), 上海科学技术出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)