Effect of different arch widths on the accuracy of three intraoral scanners
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of three intraoral scanner (IOS) systems with three different dental arch widths. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three dental models with different intermolar widths (small, medium, and large) were attached to metal bars of different lengths (30, 40, and 50 mm). The bars were measured with a coordinate measuring machine and used as references. Three IOSs were compared: TRIOS 3 (TRI), True Definition (TD), and Dental Wings (DW). The relative length and angular deviation of both ends of the metal bars from the scan data set (n = 15) were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS. Comparing among scanners in terms of trueness, the relative length deviation of DW in the small (1.28%) and medium (1.08%) arches were significantly higher than TRI (0.46% and 0.48%) and TD (0.33% and 0.18%). The angular deviation of DW in the small (1.75°) and medium (1.83°) arches were also significantly greater than TRI (0.63° and 0.40°) and TD (0.55° and 0.89°). Comparing within scanner, the large arch of DW showed better accuracy than other arch sizes (P < .05). On the other hand, the larger arch of TD presented a greater tendency of angular deviation in terms of trueness. No significant differences were found in terms of trueness between the arch widths of TRI group. CONCLUSION. The different widths of the dental arches can affect the accuracy of some intraoral scanners in full arch scan.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of three intraoral scanner (IOS) systems with three different dental arch widths. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three dental models with different intermolar widths (small, medium, and large) were attached to metal bars of different lengths (30, 40, and 50 mm). The bars were measured with a coordinate measuring machine and used as references. Three IOSs were compared: TRIOS 3 (TRI), True Definition (TD), and Dental Wings (DW). The relative length and angular deviation of both ends of the metal bars from the scan data set (n = 15) were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS. Comparing among scanners in terms of trueness, the relative length deviation of DW in the small (1.28%) and medium (1.08%) arches were significantly higher than TRI (0.46% and 0.48%) and TD (0.33% and 0.18%). The angular deviation of DW in the small (1.75°) and medium (1.83°) arches were also significantly greater than TRI (0.63° and 0.40°) and TD (0.55° and 0.89°). Comparing within scanner, the large arch of DW showed better accuracy than other arch sizes (P < .05). On the other hand, the larger arch of TD presented a greater tendency of angular deviation in terms of trueness. No significant differences were found in terms of trueness between the arch widths of TRI group. CONCLUSION. The different widths of the dental arches can affect the accuracy of some intraoral scanners in full arch scan.
참고문헌 (36)
- Zimmermann M, "Intraoral scanning systems-a current overview", Int J Comput Dent, 18, pp.101~129 (2015)
- Patzelt SB, "The time efficiency of intraoral scanners : an in vitro comparative study", J Am Dent Assoc, 145, pp.542~551 (2014)
- Logozzo S, "Recent advances in dental optics – Part I : 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry", Opt Laser Eng, 54, pp.203~221 (2014)
- Kim RJ, "Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition : a qualitative and quantitative evaluation", J Prosthet Dent, 120, pp.895~903 (2018)
- 박지만, "Comparative analysis on reproducibility among 5 intraoral scanners: sectional analysis according to restoration type and preparation outline form", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 8(5), pp.354~362 (2016), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Güth JF, "Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization", Clin Oral Investig, 21, pp.1445~1455 (2017)
- Patzelt SB, "Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners", Clin Oral Investig, 18, pp.1687~1694 (2014)
- Rehmann P, "Intraoral scanning systems : need for maintenance", Int J Prosthodont, 30, pp.27~29 (2017)
- Jeong ID, "Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner : an in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.755~759 (2016)
- Malik J, "Comparison of accuracy between a conventional and two digital intraoral impression techniques", Int J Prosthodont, 31, pp.107~113 (2018)
- Renne W, "Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners : an in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.36~42 (2017)
- Treesh JC, "Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners", J Prosthet Dent, 120, pp.382~388 (2018)
- Di Fiore A, "Full arch digital scanning systems performances for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses : a comparative study of 8 intraoral scanners", J Prosthodont Res, 63, pp.396~403 (2019)
- Ender A, "Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions : a new method of measuring trueness and precision", J Prosthet Dent, 109, pp.121~128 (2013)
- Güth JF, "A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro", Clin Oral Investig, 20, pp.1487~1494 (2016)
- Kuhr F, "A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients", J Dent, 55, pp.68~74 (2016)
- Commer P, "Construction and testing of a computer-based intraoral laser scanner for determining tooth positions", Med Eng Phys, 22, pp.625~635 (2000)
- Chochlidakis KM, "Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Prosthet Dent, 116, pp.184~190 (2016)
- Ender A, "In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions", Clin Oral Investig, 20, pp.1495~1504 (2016)
- Ender A, "In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining fullarch dental impressions", Quintessence Int, 46, pp.9~17 (2015)
- Giménez B, "Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 29, pp.853~862 (2014)
- Gan N, "Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions for whole upper jaws, including full dentitions and palatal soft tissues", PLoS One, 11, pp.e0158800~ (2016)
- Nedelcu RG, "Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners : an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.1461~1471 (2014)
- Lim JH, "Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.225~232 (2018)
- Stimmelmayr M, "Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit-an in vitro study", Clin Oral Investig, 16, pp.851~856 (2012)
- Fukazawa S, "Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners", J Prosthodont Res, 61, pp.450~459 (2017)
- Keul C, "Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions : an in vitro and in vivo comparison", Clin Oral Investig, 24, pp.735~745 (2020)
- Pramanik A, "Methods and variables in electrical discharge machining of titanium alloy-a review", Heliyon, 6, pp.e05554~ (2020)
- Ting-Shu S, "Intraoral digital impression techhttps nique: a review", J Prosthodont, 24, pp.313~321 (2015)
- Ender A, "Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems", Int J Comput Dent, 16, pp.11~21 (2013)
- Bishara SE, "Arch width changes from 6 weeks to 45 years of age", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 111, pp.401~409 (1997)
- Park JM, "Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations", J Prosthet Dent, 123, pp.113~120 (2020)
- Richert R, "Intraoral scanner technologies : a review to make a successful impression", J Healthc Eng, 2017, pp.8427595~ (2017)
- Müller P, "Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner", Quintessence Int, 47, pp.343~349 (2016)
- Ender A, "In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.313~320 (2016)
- Agne Gedrimiene, "Accuracy of digital and conventional dental implant impressions for fixed partial dentures: A comparative clinical study", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 11(5), pp.271~279 (2019), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]