천두슈(陳獨秀)의 민주주의 사유와 질문들
Chen’ Tu-hsiu’s Democracy in Thought and Practice
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article's purpose is to examine Chen Tu-hsiu's central themes of democracy both in thought and practice and reveal how they can be seen as a momentous source in today's society. Through numerous historical events, such as the New Culture movement, the May Fourth movement, formation of the Chinese Communist party and Chen's expulsion from it, Chen's imprisonment and disimprisonment, and to his latter years, the main theme of his eventful life had been democracy. Specifically, it involved the question of how could an establishment of a true democratic constitutional republic be made possible in practice. For Chen, founding a truly democratic constitutional republic meant that there would be the birth of democratic people whose modern mind must be equipped with thoughts of independence, freedom, and equality, as well as rectification and improvement of the political, economcial, and social institutions to allow the people to engage in political activities as new political subjects. This would become possible only through the completion of a democratic revolution. Chen revealed his strongly critical views on the aggressive and oppressive nationalism, and he proclaimed his cosmopolitan vision of the world where humanity could come together beyond the national barriers as the vision of the people of a democratic republic. Chen’s viewpoint and attitude are significantly distinguished from those of his contemporary progressive intellectuals, who showed little interest in or held negative views about democratic values and people’s rights as political subjects and only upheld “liberation” and “prosperity” as absolute values. In this article, I argue that Chen’s democracy in thought and practice is meaningfully comparable with Hannah Arendt’s democracy. This article illuminates how Arendt’s political philosophy’s central concepts, such as “political freedom”, “public sphere”, “a new beginning”, “plurality”, and “a loyal opposition”, shed a light on the meanings of Chen’s democracy, including Chen’s argument for people’s self-governance, his emphasis on procedural democracy and the right to oppose factions, as well as his criticism against dictatorship and fascism. By doing so, this article also aspires to reflect upon the relevance of Chen’s thesis and the questions it newly offers us in today’s society.
Abstract
This article's purpose is to examine Chen Tu-hsiu's central themes of democracy both in thought and practice and reveal how they can be seen as a momentous source in today's society. Through numerous historical events, such as the New Culture movement, the May Fourth movement, formation of the Chinese Communist party and Chen's expulsion from it, Chen's imprisonment and disimprisonment, and to his latter years, the main theme of his eventful life had been democracy. Specifically, it involved the question of how could an establishment of a true democratic constitutional republic be made possible in practice. For Chen, founding a truly democratic constitutional republic meant that there would be the birth of democratic people whose modern mind must be equipped with thoughts of independence, freedom, and equality, as well as rectification and improvement of the political, economcial, and social institutions to allow the people to engage in political activities as new political subjects. This would become possible only through the completion of a democratic revolution. Chen revealed his strongly critical views on the aggressive and oppressive nationalism, and he proclaimed his cosmopolitan vision of the world where humanity could come together beyond the national barriers as the vision of the people of a democratic republic. Chen’s viewpoint and attitude are significantly distinguished from those of his contemporary progressive intellectuals, who showed little interest in or held negative views about democratic values and people’s rights as political subjects and only upheld “liberation” and “prosperity” as absolute values. In this article, I argue that Chen’s democracy in thought and practice is meaningfully comparable with Hannah Arendt’s democracy. This article illuminates how Arendt’s political philosophy’s central concepts, such as “political freedom”, “public sphere”, “a new beginning”, “plurality”, and “a loyal opposition”, shed a light on the meanings of Chen’s democracy, including Chen’s argument for people’s self-governance, his emphasis on procedural democracy and the right to oppose factions, as well as his criticism against dictatorship and fascism. By doing so, this article also aspires to reflect upon the relevance of Chen’s thesis and the questions it newly offers us in today’s society.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김선욱, "한나 아렌트의 공화주의 ― 아모르 문디에서 레스 푸블리카로" (2015), 아포리아
- 리처드 J. 번스타인, "우리는 왜 한나 아렌트를 읽는가" (2018), 한길사
- 모리스 메이스너, "李大釗 ― 중국사회주의의 기원" (1992), 지식산업사
- 미야자키 마사카쓰, "공간의 세계사" (2015), 다산호당
- 박명규, "국민 인민 시민" (2009), 小花
- 요시자와 세이치로, "애국주의의 형성 ― 내셔널리즘으로 본 근대중국" (2006), 논형
- 자크 랑시에르, "민주주의는 왜 증오의 대상인가" (2012), 인간사랑
- 천두슈, "천두슈 사상선집" (2017), 산지니
- 한나 아렌트, "예루살렘의 아이히만 ― 악의 평범성에 대한 보고서" (2015), 한길사
- 한나 아렌트, "인간의 조건" (2017), 한길사
- 한나 아렌트, "전체주의의 기원 2" (2008), 한길사
- 한나 아렌트, "혁명론" (2004), 한길사
- 김수영, "5⋅4기 전후 진독수의 국제주의와 민족주의", 중국근현대사연구, (2) (1996)
- 문중섭, "백범 김구의 이상국가론과 민족주의, 그리고 세계화(1) : 이상국가론의 내용 분석", 한국동양정치사상사연구, 8(2), pp.135~161 (2009), 한국동양정치사상사학회
- 박재순, "한국인의 평화사상 2" (2018), 인간사랑
- 박재환, "한국인의 평화사상 1" (2018), 인간사랑
- 배경한, "한국독립운동과 辛亥革命", 한국근현대사연구, (75), pp.76~107 (2015), 한국근현대사학회
- 배영동, "陳獨秀의 民主政治思想", 중국사연구, (31), pp.285~330 (2004), 중국사학회
- 이준태, "晩年思想을 통해 살펴본 陳獨秀의 “세계화 (Globalization)” 인식", 아태연구, 14(2), pp.145~159 (2007), 국제지역연구원[DOI]
- 임상범, "20세기 후반기 한국에서의 5ㆍ4운동 연구사", 중국근현대사연구, (64), pp.247~289 (2014), 중국근현대사학회
- 한시준, "한국인의 평화사상 2" (2018), 인간사랑
- 홍원표, "혁명론" (2004), 한길사
- 홍윤기, "시민'은 어떻게 애국하는가", 사회와 철학, (7), pp.263~311 (2004), 한국사회와철학연구회
- 贾可卿, "略论陈独秀民主思想发展的三个阶段", 安徽教育学院学包, 21(2) (2003)
- 蒋贤斌, "试析晚年陈独秀的民主思想", 江西师范大学学报, 35(2) (2002)
- 孙寿涛, "陈独秀民主政治思想的再检讨", 天津师范大学学报, (4) (2006)
- 徐继良, "九十年代以来陈独秀研究述评", 首都师范大学学报, (1) (1999)
