본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국 영화 연구의 역사와 전망― 분과 학문의 지식 생산에서 학제간 연구로의 전환

The History and Prospect of Chinese Cinema Studies: From Disciplinary Studies to Inter-disciplinary Research

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

In general, it has been only 50 years since ‘cinema’ became an object of academic research or what we call ‘film studies’ now was established as an academic discipline in university. In late 1960s, young professors of literature, history, and philosophy began to employ cinema to teach social currents of a period throughout North American colleges and universities. Summarizing the background of establishing the department of film studies as an academic discipline, David Bordwell describes the vicissitudes of film studies from the deflection of film theories associated with ‘grand theory’ in the 1970s to the variation and expansion of film theories in the 1990s. In this historical context of film studies, Chinese film studies has been gradually constructed since the 1980s. As the so-called Chinese ‘Fifth Generation’ films attracted great attention of the world, Chinese film studies has been promoted in a global level. Chinese film studies throughout the last 30 years has been discussed in a variety of perspectives. For instance, they cover a wide rage of topics from the ‘Fifth Generation’ films, to the 1990s Chinese independent films, Chinese film historiography, Chinese early cinema, critical studies on Chinese cinema, Chinese new documentaries, and Chinese commercial films. However, the traditional framework of national cinema is no longer valid to study contemporary Chinese cinema(s) in the context of globalization, because Chinese cinema(s) tends to work more and more in the transnational context, not limited to a single national border line. Thus, the issues of national cinema in Chinese cinema studies turns to the relationship between cinema and the national in a transnational context. Besides, film medium itself changes fundamentally now. With the rapid development of digital technology, what we called cinema before gradually transforms to different cinema or another visual medium. Cinema is no longer made only by celluloid film, and screened only in movie theaters. The changes of cinematic platform, which is often called ‘post-cinema’, accelerate more than ever, and the production, distribution, and reception of cinema changes rapidly and radically. As cinema interacts with other media, Chinese film studies requires a diversity of transmedia perspectives. As the categories of ‘China’ and ‘film’ as objects of research changes in an idiom of ‘Chinese film studies’, how to study Chinse film becomes problematic. Chinese film studies needs to escape from the traditional restriction of academic discipline, and seek to find a new research methodology of inter-disciplinary research including social science, natural science, and technology as well as human science. The inter-disciplinary research for Chinese film studies becomes a necessary task to construct a new knowledge production beyond the exclusive boundary of traditional academic disciplines.

Abstract

In general, it has been only 50 years since ‘cinema’ became an object of academic research or what we call ‘film studies’ now was established as an academic discipline in university. In late 1960s, young professors of literature, history, and philosophy began to employ cinema to teach social currents of a period throughout North American colleges and universities. Summarizing the background of establishing the department of film studies as an academic discipline, David Bordwell describes the vicissitudes of film studies from the deflection of film theories associated with ‘grand theory’ in the 1970s to the variation and expansion of film theories in the 1990s. In this historical context of film studies, Chinese film studies has been gradually constructed since the 1980s. As the so-called Chinese ‘Fifth Generation’ films attracted great attention of the world, Chinese film studies has been promoted in a global level. Chinese film studies throughout the last 30 years has been discussed in a variety of perspectives. For instance, they cover a wide rage of topics from the ‘Fifth Generation’ films, to the 1990s Chinese independent films, Chinese film historiography, Chinese early cinema, critical studies on Chinese cinema, Chinese new documentaries, and Chinese commercial films. However, the traditional framework of national cinema is no longer valid to study contemporary Chinese cinema(s) in the context of globalization, because Chinese cinema(s) tends to work more and more in the transnational context, not limited to a single national border line. Thus, the issues of national cinema in Chinese cinema studies turns to the relationship between cinema and the national in a transnational context. Besides, film medium itself changes fundamentally now. With the rapid development of digital technology, what we called cinema before gradually transforms to different cinema or another visual medium. Cinema is no longer made only by celluloid film, and screened only in movie theaters. The changes of cinematic platform, which is often called ‘post-cinema’, accelerate more than ever, and the production, distribution, and reception of cinema changes rapidly and radically. As cinema interacts with other media, Chinese film studies requires a diversity of transmedia perspectives. As the categories of ‘China’ and ‘film’ as objects of research changes in an idiom of ‘Chinese film studies’, how to study Chinse film becomes problematic. Chinese film studies needs to escape from the traditional restriction of academic discipline, and seek to find a new research methodology of inter-disciplinary research including social science, natural science, and technology as well as human science. The inter-disciplinary research for Chinese film studies becomes a necessary task to construct a new knowledge production beyond the exclusive boundary of traditional academic disciplines.

참고문헌 (100)

  1. 곽수경, "영화로 만나는 현대 중국" (2012), 산지니
  2. 김정구, "1930년대 상하이 영화의 근대성 연구: 여성의 재현 양상을 중심으로", pp.2004
  3. 다이진화, "무중풍경: 1978-1998" (2007), 산지니
  4. 레이초우, "원시적 열정: 시각, 섹슈얼리티, 민족지, 현대중국영화" (2004), 이산
  5. 루훙스, "차이나 시네마" (2002), 동인
  6. 뤼신위, "‘하층(底層)’의 정치, 윤리, 그리고 미학 ― 2011 난징독립다큐멘터리 포럼의 발언 및 보충", 문화과학, (77) (2014)
  7. 리어우판, "상하이 모던" (2007), 고려대학교출판부
  8. "중국, 스토리를 담은 마이크로 필름(微電影) 광고가 인기있는 이유" (2013), 박성민[URL]
  9. 박정수, "중국 영화 산업" (2015), 커뮤니케이션북스
  10. 박희성, "중국⋅홍콩⋅타이완 영화" (2000), 커뮤니케이션북스
  11. 사카이 나오키, "번역과 주체" (2005), 이산
  12. "극장 개봉 안하는 ‘넷플릭스 영화’ 칸 수상 자격 없다" (2017)[URL]
  13. 이종희, "중국 영화의 어제 오늘 내일" (2000), 책세상
  14. 인훙, "중국 영상문화의 이해" (2000), 학고방
  15. 임대근, "중국 영화학을 둘레 짓기 위한 한 가지 물음― 중국 영화학은 웨인 왕의 영화를 다룰 수 있는가?", 중국현대문학, (32), pp.1~21 (2005), 한국중국현대문학학회
  16. 임대근, "중국영화교육 추의(芻議)", 중어중문학, (37), pp.457~491 (2005), 한국중어중문학회
  17. 임대근, "중국영화의 국적성 혹은 지역성과 역사ㆍ문화정치학", 영화연구, (38), pp.371~390 (2008), 한국영화학회
  18. 임대근, "1930년대 ‘상하이 영화’와 ‘중국 영화’의 형성", 중국현대문학, (48), pp.91~111 (2009), 한국중국현대문학학회
  19. 임춘성, "20세기 상하이 영화: 역사와 해제" (2010), 산지니
  20. 장동천, "영화와 현대중국" (2008), 고려대학교 출판부
  21. 정찬철, "포스트 시네마로의 전환", 영화연구, (64), pp.135~175 (2015), 한국영화학회
  22. 조혜영, "영화의 죽음 : 포스트필름 영화의 존재양식에 대한 연구", 박사, 영상예술학과 영화영상이론전공, pp.2013
  23. 주진숙, "중국영화의 역사, 경향, 그리고 새로운 세대", 영화연구, (7) (1990)
  24. 진성희, "국내의 중국영화사 관련 저술의 현황과 제 문제", 중국소설논총, (41), pp.305~324 (2013), 한국중국소설학회
  25. 폴 윌먼, "트랜스: 아시아 영상문화" (2006), 현실문화연구
  26. 미츠히로 요시모토, "트랜스: 아시아 영상문화" (2006), 현실문화연구
  27. 한국중국현대문학학회, "중국영화의 이해" (2008), 동녘
  28. 程季華, "中國電影發展史" (1963), 中國電影出版社
  29. 廣播電影電視部電影局黨史資料征集工作領導小組, "中國左翼電影運動" (1996), 中國電影出版社
  30. 戴錦華, "電影理論與批評手冊" (1993), 科學技術文獻出版社出版社
  31. 戴錦華, "霧中風景――中國電影文化1978-1998年" (2000), 北京大學出版社
  32. 陸弘石, "中國電影史" (1998), 文化藝術出版社
  33. 鍾大豐, "中國電影史" (2004), 中國廣播電視出版社
  34. 陳犀禾, "當代中國電影:1979-1989" (1993)
  35. 陳犀禾, "華語電影" (2010), 復旦大學出版社
  36. 李道新, "中國電影批評史(1897-2000)" (2002), 中國電影出版社
  37. 李道新, "中國電影文化史(1905-2004)" (2005), 北京大學出版社
  38. 李道新, "中國電影史研究專題" (2006), 北京大學出版社
  39. 酈蘇元, "中國無聲電影史" (1996), 中國電影出版社
  40. 陳淸洋, "中國電影海報史" (2015), 中國廣播電視出版社
  41. 程青松, "我的攝影機不撒謊" (2002), 中國友誼出版公司
  42. 呂新雨, "紀錄中國: 當代中國新紀錄運動" (2003), 三聯書店
  43. 吳文光, "現場 1" (2000), 天津社會科學出版社
  44. 吳文光, "現場 2" (2001), 天津社會科學出版社
  45. 吳文光, "現場 3" (2005), 廣西師範大學出版社
  46. 北京電影學院85級導、攝、錄、美、文全體畢業生, "中國電影的後“黃土地”現象——關於一次中國電影的談話", 上海藝術家, (4) (1993)
  47. "誰殺死了“白鹿”――從『白鹿原』到『田小娥傳』" (2014)[URL]
  48. "賈樟柯的世界與中國的大轉變" (2007)[URL]
  49. 張暖忻, "談電影語言的現代化", 電影藝術, (4) (1979)
  50. 張頤武, "『英雄』:新世紀的隱喻", 當代電影, (2) (2003)
  51. 張頤武, "第五代與中國文化的轉型", 當代電影, (3) (2005)
  52. 張碩果, "“十七年”上海電影文化硏究" (2014), 社會科學文獻出版社
  53. Ang, Ien, "Cultural Studies Matter (Does It?): Engaging Inter", disciplinarity, 2013, pp.14(3), ~
  54. Baudry, Jean-Louis, "Film Theory and Criticism" (1992), Oxford University Press
  55. Berry, Chris, "Race (民族): Chinese Film and the Politics of Nationalism", Cinema Journal, 32(2), pp.45~58 (1997)
  56. Berry, Chris, "The Accidental Scholar", Asian Cinema, 17(1) (2006)
  57. Berry, Chris, "Introduction, or What is an ‘s’", Journal of Chinese Cinemas, 2(1) (2008)
  58. Berry, Chris, "China on Screen: Cinema and Nation" (2006), Columbia University Press
  59. Berry, Chris, "The New Chinese Documentary Film Movement: For the Public Record" (2011), Hong Kong University Press
  60. Berry, Michael, "Speaking in Images" (2005), Columbia University Press
  61. Berry, Michael, "Jia Zhangke’s ‘Hometown Trilogy’: Xiao Wu, Platform, Unknown Pleasure" (2009), BFI
  62. Bordwell, David, "Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies" (1996), The University of Wisconsin Press
  63. Braester, Yomi, "Witness Against History: Literature, Film, and Public Discourse in Twentieth-Century China" (2003), Stanford University Press
  64. Braester, Yomi, "Urban Generation" (2007), Duke University Press
  65. Browne, Nick, "New Chinese Cinemas: Forms, Identities, Politics" (1996), Cambridge University Press
  66. Chow, Rey, "Primitive Passions: Visuality, Sexuality, Ethnography, and Contemporary Chinese Cinema" (1995), Columbia University Press
  67. Chow, Rey, "Sentimental Fabulations, Contemporary Chinese Films: Attachment in the Age of Global Visibility" (2007), Columbia University Press
  68. Clark, Paul, "Chinese Cinema: Culture and Politics Since 1949" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  69. Curtin, Michael, "Playing to the World’s Biggest Audience: The Globalization of Chinese Film and TV" (2007), University of California Press
  70. Dai, Jinhua, "Cinema and Desire: Feminist Marxism and Cultural Politics in the Work of Daijinhua" (2002), Verso
  71. Ehrlich, Linda C., "Cinematic Landscape: Observations on the Visual Arts and Cinema of China and Japan" (1994), University of Texas
  72. Hansen, Miriam, "Fallen Women, Rising Stars, New Horizons: Shanghai Silent Film as Vernacular Modernism", Film Quaterly, 54(1) (2000)
  73. Jeong Seung-hoon, "The Global Auteur: The Politics of Authorship in 21st Century Cinema" (2016), Bloomsbury Academic
  74. "Wang Bing Films Souls: On Ta’ang and Other Recent Work"[URL]
  75. Lee, Leo Ou-fan, "Shanghai Modern: Flowering of a New Urban Culture in China, 1930-1945" (1999), Harvard University Press
  76. Leyda, Jay, "Dianying: An Account of Films and the Film Audience in China" (1972), MIT Press
  77. Lu, Sheldon H., "Transnational Chinese Cinemas: Identity, Nationhood, Gender" (1997), University of Hawaii Press
  78. Lu, Sheldon H., "Chinese-Language Film: Historiography, Poetics, Politics" (2005), University of Hawaii Press
  79. Lu, Tonglin, "Confronting Modernity in the Cinemas of Taiwan and Mainland China" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  80. Ma, Ning, "The Textual and Critical Difference of Being Radical: Reconstructing Chinese Leftist Films of the 1930s", Wide Angle, 11(2) (1989)
  81. McGrath, Jason, "Postsocialist Modernity: Chinese Cinema, Literature, and Criticism in the Market Age" (2008), Stanford University Press
  82. Mulvey, Laura, "Visual and Other Pleasure" (1990), Indiana University Press
  83. Ni, Zhen, "Memoirs from the Beijing Film Academy: The Genesis of China’s Fifth Generation" (2002), Duke University Press
  84. Pang, Laikwan, "Building a New China in Cinema: The Chinese Left-wing Cinema Movement 1932-1937" (2002), Rowman & Littlefield
  85. Pickowicz, Paul, "New Chinese Cinema" (1996), Cambridge University Press
  86. Pickowicz, Paul, "From Underground to Independent: Alternative Film Culture in Contemporary China" (2006), Rowman & Littlefield
  87. Silbergeld, Jerome, "China into Film: Frames of Reference in Contemporary Chinese Cinema" (1999), Reaktion Press
  88. Tang, Xiaobing, "Visual Culture in Contemporary China: Paradigms and Shifts" (2015), Cambridge University Press
  89. Willenmen, Paul, "Looks and Frictions: Essays in Cultural Studies and Film Theory" (1993), BFI
  90. Zhang, Rui, "The Cinema of Feng Xiaogang: Commercialization and Censorship in Chinese Cinema after 1989" (2010), Hong Kong University Press
  91. Zhang, Xudong, "Chinese Modernism in the Era of Reforms: Cultural Fever, Avant-Garde Fiction and the New Chinese Cinema" (1997), Duke University Press
  92. Zhang, Xudong, "Postsocialism and Cultural Politics: China in the Last Decade of the Twentieth Century" (2008), Duke University Press
  93. Zhang, Yingjin, "Cinema and Urban Culture in Shanghai, 1922-43" (1999), Stanford University Press
  94. Zhang, Yingjin, "Screening China: Critical Interventions, Cinematic Reconfigurations, and the Transnational Imaginary in Contemporary Chinese Cinema" (2002), Center For Chinese Studies
  95. Zhang Yingjin, "Chinese National Cinema" (2004), Routledge
  96. Zhang, Yingjin, "Encyclopedia of Chinese Film" (2004), Routledge
  97. Zhang Yingjin, "Comparative film studies, transnational film studies: interdisciplinarity, crossmediality, and transcultural visuality in Chinese cinema", Journal of Chinese Cinemas, 1(1) (2007)
  98. Zhang, Zhen, "An Amorous History of the Silver Screen: Shanghai Cinema 1896-1937" (2006), University of Chicago Press
  99. Zhang, Zhen, "The Urban Generation: Chinese Cinema and Society at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century" (2007), Duke University Press
  100. Zhou, Xuelin, "Young Rebels in Contemporary Chinese Cinema" (2007), Hong Kong University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)