국내의 중국영화사 관련 저술의 현황과 제 문제
Status and Problems of Writings on Chinese Film History in Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Study is done on the status of writings with regard to Chinese film history in Korea and on how to develop stories in them. This study indicates Korea’s attempt to understand China through its movies. Korea academics have tried to perceive Chinese movies in their own way since the early 2000s. About 40 books have been published on Chinese movies, most of which strongly show their general characteristics. The books are considered “historical description”. This thesis is on how Chinese movies are written in Korean Chinese film history publications and on their writing style and fundamental problems. To this end, works are classified by criteria and characterized. In addition, the thesis discusses problems with writings on Chinese film history and how Chinese movies are thought of through their writing style. Also, it suggests the direction to study on Chinese film history in the future. In other words, it looks into how to overcome the limitations of writings. So far, writings on Chinese film history have committed to writing what Korea wants to know in Chinese movies. Therefore, they focus on controversial directors and their films, and Chinese movies showing only Chinese characteristics. They are only centered on movie companies on the main land and on the movie history of blockbusters. They rarely deal with non-mainstream movies or low-budget movies. However, writings shouldn’t be done just on movies themselves. Film history can’t be understood by analyzing and describing just films and their writers and directors. This can’t show the whole picture. It is difficult interpreting phenomena and problems in film history. Therefore, writings on film history should be approached from every angle. That’s because movie history is not fixed, but incomplete and varied. Film history should continue to be revised without end.
Abstract
Study is done on the status of writings with regard to Chinese film history in Korea and on how to develop stories in them. This study indicates Korea’s attempt to understand China through its movies. Korea academics have tried to perceive Chinese movies in their own way since the early 2000s. About 40 books have been published on Chinese movies, most of which strongly show their general characteristics. The books are considered “historical description”. This thesis is on how Chinese movies are written in Korean Chinese film history publications and on their writing style and fundamental problems. To this end, works are classified by criteria and characterized. In addition, the thesis discusses problems with writings on Chinese film history and how Chinese movies are thought of through their writing style. Also, it suggests the direction to study on Chinese film history in the future. In other words, it looks into how to overcome the limitations of writings. So far, writings on Chinese film history have committed to writing what Korea wants to know in Chinese movies. Therefore, they focus on controversial directors and their films, and Chinese movies showing only Chinese characteristics. They are only centered on movie companies on the main land and on the movie history of blockbusters. They rarely deal with non-mainstream movies or low-budget movies. However, writings shouldn’t be done just on movies themselves. Film history can’t be understood by analyzing and describing just films and their writers and directors. This can’t show the whole picture. It is difficult interpreting phenomena and problems in film history. Therefore, writings on film history should be approached from every angle. That’s because movie history is not fixed, but incomplete and varied. Film history should continue to be revised without end.
참고문헌 (52)
- 곽수경, "영화로 만나는 현대중국" (2012), 산지니
- 김미정, "영화로 읽는 중국문화이야기" (2008), 신아사
- 김려실, "만주영화협회와 조선영화" (2011), 한국영상자료원
- 김종박, "영화로 보는 중국사" (2007), 주류성
- 김지석, "香港電影 1997년-홍콩 영화의 이해" (1995), 한울
- 김현미, "글로벌 시대의 문화번역-젠더, 인종, 계층의 경계를 넘어" (2006), 도서출판 또 하나의 문화
- 이현복, "무중풍경" (2007), 산지니
- 루홍스, "중국영화사" (2013), 전남대학교 출판부
- 류닝, "중국 영상산업 계약과 실제" (2013), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 정옥근, "세계화속의 중국 영화" (2005), 신성출판사
- 류샤오양, "은막의 여정-중국영화의 새로운 이정표를 찾아서" (2008), 학고방
- 박정희, "중국영화문화도시" (2009), 부산대학교 출판부
- 박희성, "중국⋅홍콩⋅타이완 영화" (2013), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 송행근, "영화로 이해하는 중극 근현대" (2006), 르네상스
- 슈테만 크라머, "중국영화사" (2000), 이산
- 안상혁, "중국 6세대 영화 삶의 본질을 말하다" (2008), 성균관대학교출판부
- 오현리, "중국무협영화1,2" (2001), 한숲출판사
- 윤미영, "중국 역사와 영화의 만남" (2006), 한국학술정보
- 윤미영, "영화 속의 중국문화" (2009), 이담북스
- 이욱연, "인생은 고달파" (2008), 창비
- 이종철, "중국영화의 거장들" (2008), 학고방
- 이종철, "중국 영화에 반하다" (2008), 학고방
- 이종철, "홍콩의 열혈남아들-홍콩영화 이야기" (2012), 학고방
- 이종희, "중국 영화의 어제 오늘 내일" (2000), 책세상
- 인홍, "중국 영상문화의 이해" (2002), 학고방
- 임대근, "중국영화이야기" (2004), 살림지식총서
- 임춘성, "상하이영화와 상하이인의 정체성" (2010), 산지니
- 임춘성, "20세기 상하이영화: 역사와 해제" (2010), 산지니
- 장동천, "영화와 현대중국" (2008), 고려대학교 출판부
- 최환, "중국 영화의 이해와 감상" (2010), 영남대학교 출판부
- 한국중국현대문학학회, "영화로 읽는 중국" (2006), 동녘
- 한국중국현대문학학회, "중국영화의 이해" (2008), 동녘
- 후지이 쇼조, "현대중국, 영화로 가다" (2001), 지호
- "지아장커 중국 영화의 미래", 현실문화연구 (2002)
- 杜雲之, "中國電影史" (1972), 商務印書館
- 丁亞平, "百年中國電影理論文選" (2002), 文化藝術出版社
- 丁亞平, "老電影時代" (2002), 文象出版社
- 丁亞平, "1897~2001百年中國電影理論文選(上下)" (2002), 文化藝術出版社
- 박정수, "사회주의시장경제와 중국 영화산업 개혁 : 시장, 제도, 그리고 양극화", 박사, 정치외교학, pp.2010
- 김기봉, "메타역사로서 역사비평-필요성과 과제", 역사와 현실, 40 (2001), 한국역사연구회
- 김한상, "영화의 국적 관념과 국가영화사의 제도화 연구김한상 한국영상자료원 연구원. 서울대학교 사회학과 박사과정 * 이 연구는 2008년도 영화진흥위원회가 실시한 학술연구지원사업 신진연구지원 부문에 선정되어 지원받았음. ― ‘한국영화사’ 주요 연구문헌을 중심으로", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (80), pp.257~286 (2008), 한국사회사학회
- 조희문, "한국영화사 연구의 새로운 시선", 서평문화, 65 (2007), 한국간행물윤리위원회
- 黄鹏, "中国电影史学史研究纲要", 박사, 电影学, pp.2013
- 郦苏元, "关于中国电影史写作走向的思考", 当代电影 (2005)
- 石川, "后编年体史述: 多元体裁与深度阐释", 当代电影 (2009)
- 虞吉, "中国“主流电影”的电影史理据", 文艺研究 (2012)
- 李道新, "重构中国电影-从学术史的角度观照改革开放以来的中国电影史研究", 当代电影 (2008)
- 王颖, "2012年山东电影研究综述", 齐鲁艺苑 (2013)
- 张权生, "农民工电影的电影史意义", 新疆艺术学院学报 (2012)
- 赵卫防, "港台电影研究: 中国电影史研究的瓶颈", 当代电影 (2009)
- 陈犀禾, "多视角、多维度的新中国电影史", 学术月刊 (2008)
- 陈犀禾, "重写中国电影史与“华语电影”的视角", 学术月刊 (2008)