본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

방법으로서의 ‘일대일로’ ― 원톄쥔 학파의 관점에 기대어

‘One Belt One Road’ As a Methodology: Based on the Perspective of Wen Tie-jun School

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This thesis aims to understand the existential method of reality in ‘China’ and its ontological thickness by reviewing the ‘One Belt, One Road’ which is the biggest pending issue of the recent ‘China issues’ in the perspective of Wen Tie-jun school. In other words, this is a methodological attempt to draw a new task of sinology by relocating the existential method and thickness within the ‘rational description system of interpretation and explanation’. According to Wen Tie, the ‘One Belt, One Road’ is a strategy to pioneer an exterior space for handling the excessive productivity and excessive financial profits within China. At the same time, the ‘One Belt, One Road’ is a strategy of China to break through the U. S’ scheme to surround the land power with the marine power. However, the meaning here is already spreading even to the layer of the history of civilization after exceeding the level of world strategy. This planning might be the starting point and the conclusion of ‘China issues’ that China currently faces. In the reality of academia where the recent demands for interdisciplinary ‘crossing’ and ‘convergence’ are gradually increasing, the ‘One Belt, One Road’ suggests a methodological model that includes the extensive area from political economy to philosophy of history, from geopolitics to geoeconomics, from cultural history to theory of civilization, and from discourse to policy. The ‘One Belt, One Road’ itself suggests a field of new general studies to us.

Abstract

This thesis aims to understand the existential method of reality in ‘China’ and its ontological thickness by reviewing the ‘One Belt, One Road’ which is the biggest pending issue of the recent ‘China issues’ in the perspective of Wen Tie-jun school. In other words, this is a methodological attempt to draw a new task of sinology by relocating the existential method and thickness within the ‘rational description system of interpretation and explanation’. According to Wen Tie, the ‘One Belt, One Road’ is a strategy to pioneer an exterior space for handling the excessive productivity and excessive financial profits within China. At the same time, the ‘One Belt, One Road’ is a strategy of China to break through the U. S’ scheme to surround the land power with the marine power. However, the meaning here is already spreading even to the layer of the history of civilization after exceeding the level of world strategy. This planning might be the starting point and the conclusion of ‘China issues’ that China currently faces. In the reality of academia where the recent demands for interdisciplinary ‘crossing’ and ‘convergence’ are gradually increasing, the ‘One Belt, One Road’ suggests a methodological model that includes the extensive area from political economy to philosophy of history, from geopolitics to geoeconomics, from cultural history to theory of civilization, and from discourse to policy. The ‘One Belt, One Road’ itself suggests a field of new general studies to us.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 溫鐵軍, "八次危機" (2014), 東方出版社
  2. 원톄쥔, "여덟 차례 위기" (2016), 돌베개
  3. 필립 암스트롱, "1945년 이후의 자본주의" (1993), 동아출판사
  4. 브레진스키, "거대한 체스판" (2000), 삼인
  5. 재닛 아부-루고드, "유럽 패권 이전: 13세기 세계체제" (2006), 까치글방
  6. 카를 슈미트, "땅과 바다" (2016), 꾸리에
  7. 카를 슈미트, "대지의 노모스" (1995), 민음사
  8. 중국자본의 해외 실물 및 금융투자 현황과 전망, "이근", 한국금융연구원, ~ (2012)
  9. "인문학적 관점에서 바라본 중국의 일대일로와 사드", 고려대학교 중국학연구소 2017년 춘계학술대회 자료집
  10. 温铁軍, "理性看待全球危機, 自覺轉向生態文明", 福建農林大學學報, (4) (2015)
  11. "金融全球化成本轉嫁與中國生態文明戰略"[URL]
  12. 원톄쥔, "자본주의 금융화 단계의 실상과 그것이 동아시아에 끼치는 영향", 順義 梁漱溟鄕村建設中心에서의 강연록, ~ (2016)
  13. 원톄쥔, "중국의 ‘일대일로’는 평화발전 이념인가", 창작과비평, (169) (2015), 창작과비평사
  14. 俞可平, "重新思考平等、公平和正义(之一)", 学术月刊, (4) (2017)
  15. 공상철, "최근 중국문제 독해를 위한 방법적 시론", 중국어문학지, (68), pp.136~156 (2019), 중국어문학회[DOI]
  16. 강진아, "동아시아로 다시 쓴 세계사―포머란츠와 캘리포니아 학파", 역사비평, (82), pp.235~265 (2008), 역사문제연구소
  17. 강진아, "중국의 부상과 세계사의 재조명 -캘리포니아 학파에서 글로벌 헤게모니論까지-", 역사와경계, (80), pp.145~186 (2011), 부산경남사학회
  18. 김두진, "유럽산업혁명과 동아시아 ‘대분기’(Great Divergence) 논쟁", 아세아연구, 55(2), pp.39~73 (2012), 아세아문제연구원[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)