이토 도라마루(伊藤虎丸)의 魯迅論― 「광인일기」를 중심으로
Ito Toramaru and His Study of Luxun: Focused on “A Madman’s Diary”
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
I try to explain Ito Doramaru(伊藤虎丸)’s central idea, i.e. eschatology, individual self-consciousness and consider his new reading method of “A Madman’s Diary” in this article. His so-called apocalyptic individual self-consciousness means that every individual person should have a sense of responsibility respectively and face the history and the reality without falling into the nihilism. His viewpoint like this was influenced by Maruyama Masao(丸山眞男)’s Japanese Thought and Kumano Yoshitaka(熊野義孝)’s Eschatology and Philosophy of history. According to Ito, apocalyptic individual self-consciousness in Luxun resulted in cleary awakened Realism through two-time literary consciousness(i.e. convincement) and Luxun’s literature changed from ‘literature of revelation’ to ‘literature of atonement’ by virtue of cleary awakened Realism. So Ito asserted that “A Madman’s Diary” is an autobiographical work that shows Luxun’s two-time literary consciousness. I think it very valuable that Ito reinterpreted Luxun and his works from a current meaning.
Abstract
I try to explain Ito Doramaru(伊藤虎丸)’s central idea, i.e. eschatology, individual self-consciousness and consider his new reading method of “A Madman’s Diary” in this article. His so-called apocalyptic individual self-consciousness means that every individual person should have a sense of responsibility respectively and face the history and the reality without falling into the nihilism. His viewpoint like this was influenced by Maruyama Masao(丸山眞男)’s Japanese Thought and Kumano Yoshitaka(熊野義孝)’s Eschatology and Philosophy of history. According to Ito, apocalyptic individual self-consciousness in Luxun resulted in cleary awakened Realism through two-time literary consciousness(i.e. convincement) and Luxun’s literature changed from ‘literature of revelation’ to ‘literature of atonement’ by virtue of cleary awakened Realism. So Ito asserted that “A Madman’s Diary” is an autobiographical work that shows Luxun’s two-time literary consciousness. I think it very valuable that Ito reinterpreted Luxun and his works from a current meaning.
참고문헌 (18)
- 魯迅, "魯迅全集 第八卷" (2005), 人民出版社
- 伊藤虎丸, "魯迅と終末論――近代リアリズムの成立" (1975), 龍溪書舍
- 伊藤虎丸, "魯迅と日本人-アジアの近代と‘個’の思想" (1983), 朝日新聞社
- 熊野義孝, "終末論と歷史哲學" (1940), 新生堂
- 藤虎丸, "魯迅, 創造社與日本文學――中日近現代比較文學初探" (1995), 北京大學出版社
- 伊藤虎丸, "魯迅與日本人――亞洲的近代與‘個’的思想" (2001), 河北敎育出版社
- 마루야마 마사오, "일본의 사상" (1998), 한길사
- 伊藤虎丸, "魯迅思想の獨異性とキリスト敎――近代文化の受容をめぐって", 東京女子大學付屬比較文化硏究所紀要, 49 (1988)
- 伊藤虎丸, "「魯迅と終末論」再說――‘竹內魯迅’と一九三〇年代思想の今日的意義", 東京女子大学比較文化研究所紀要, (62) (2001)
- "中國文化: 硏究と敎育", 2002, ~
- 松本 周, "終末論と敎會形成: 熊野義孝と大木英夫の比較檢討", 聖學院大學總合硏究所紀要, (42) (2008)
- 서광덕, "동아시아의 근대성과 노신: 일본의 노신 연구를 중심으로", 박사, 중어중문학, pp.2003
- 배경식, "『희망의 신학』과 우주적 종말", 한국조직신학논총, (38), pp.79~120 (2014), 한국조직신학회[DOI]
- 서광덕, "동아시아 담론과 루쉰 연구", 중어중문학, 34, pp.467~484 (2004), 한국중어중문학회
- 서광덕, "다케우치 요시미(竹內好)의 일본근대비판과 루쉰(魯迅)연구", 중국현대문학, (27), pp.1~26 (2003), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 안수강, "근현대 종말론 동향 및 관점 분석: ‘시상’(時相)과 ‘국면’(局面)을 중심으로 - 바이스로부터 후크마까지 -", 생명과말씀, 21, pp.129~167 (2018), 개혁주의생명신학회[DOI]
- 이경희, "마루야마 마사오와 다케우치 요시미의 전후 사상 재건과 ‘근대’적 사유-전전의 문화권력 ‘근대의 초극’과의 비", 연속성-, 2018, pp.(73), 57~82[DOI]
- 이상성, "과학의 시간과 변증법적 종말론", 한국조직신학논총, (20), pp.261~291 (2008), 한국조직신학회[DOI]
