기데온 투리의 ‘용인성’ 개념과 그 해석
Gideon Toury’s notion of acceptability and its interpretations
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Unlike its opposing concept, “adequacy”, “acceptability” is a concept that was first defined in translation studies by Gideon Toury. Here, adequacy can be connected with the source text (ST) whereas acceptability may be related to the target text (TT). We can therefore consider these concepts as a binary concept of translation studies, along with ‘overt vs. covert’, ‘sourcier vs. cibliste’, ‘foreignizing vs. domesticating’, etc. On the one hand, the notion of acceptability has been criticized by Palma Zlateva, Andrew Chesterman and Theo Hermans because of its ambiguity. On the other, this concept is interpreted differently by Mathieu Guidère, Malcolm Williams, and Beatriz Rodríguez Rodríguez in the Occident, and by Sang-Won Lee, Hyunju Jeon, and the Research Group of Korea University for the Evaluation of Korean Translations of French Great Literature. We will argue that these conflicts of interpretation derive mostly from the ambiguity of Toury’s very definition of acceptability. We can therefore say that, as a concept, it is rather problematic and controversial than clear. However, acceptability is one of the main concepts representing the trend of TT-oriented research today, so we must continue to examine it in detail. To find out the reasons for the diversity of interpretation of Toury’s acceptability, it is necessary to study how acceptability is used in other theories in translation studies and in the theories of translation evaluation that make active use of this notion.
Abstract
Unlike its opposing concept, “adequacy”, “acceptability” is a concept that was first defined in translation studies by Gideon Toury. Here, adequacy can be connected with the source text (ST) whereas acceptability may be related to the target text (TT). We can therefore consider these concepts as a binary concept of translation studies, along with ‘overt vs. covert’, ‘sourcier vs. cibliste’, ‘foreignizing vs. domesticating’, etc. On the one hand, the notion of acceptability has been criticized by Palma Zlateva, Andrew Chesterman and Theo Hermans because of its ambiguity. On the other, this concept is interpreted differently by Mathieu Guidère, Malcolm Williams, and Beatriz Rodríguez Rodríguez in the Occident, and by Sang-Won Lee, Hyunju Jeon, and the Research Group of Korea University for the Evaluation of Korean Translations of French Great Literature. We will argue that these conflicts of interpretation derive mostly from the ambiguity of Toury’s very definition of acceptability. We can therefore say that, as a concept, it is rather problematic and controversial than clear. However, acceptability is one of the main concepts representing the trend of TT-oriented research today, so we must continue to examine it in detail. To find out the reasons for the diversity of interpretation of Toury’s acceptability, it is necessary to study how acceptability is used in other theories in translation studies and in the theories of translation evaluation that make active use of this notion.
참고문헌 (30)
- 구하나, "목표지향적 번역이론과 '용인성'", 통역과 번역, 12(2), pp.27~48 (2010), 한국통역번역학회
- 이상원, "출판 번역 비평과 번역 규범", 통역과 번역, 6(2), pp.39~58 (2004), 한국통역번역학회
- 이상원, "한국 출판 번역 독자들의 번역평가 규범 연구" (2006), 한국학술정보
- 2008년도 기초연구과제지원사업 (인문사회분야) “프랑스 명작소설 번역평가” 1차년도 연차보고서, "이영훈", 한국학술진흥재단, ~ (2009)
- 전현주, "번역 텍스트의 용인성:번역 비평가의 관점을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 7(2), pp.179~205 (2006), 한국번역학회
- 전현주, "번역비평에 대한 비평적 분석", 박사, pp.2007
- 전현주, "번역비평의 패러다임" (2008), 한국학술정보(주)
- Chesterman, Andrew, "Memes of Translation" (1997), John Benjamins
- "박사", Tel Aviv U, 1971
- Even-Zohar, Itamar, "'Spleen' le-Baudelaire be-tirgum Lea Goldberg: Le'ofi ha-hakhra'ot be-tirgum šira'", Ha-sifrut, 1975, pp.21, 32~45
- Even-Zohar, Itamar, "Polysystem Studies", Poetics Today, 11(1), pp.1~268 (1990)
- Gambier, Yves, "Handbook of translation studies" (2010), John Benjamins
- Guidère, Mathieu, "Introduction à la traductologie" (2008), De Boeck
- Hagström, Anne-Christine, "Un miroir aux alouettes? - Stratégies pour la traduction des métaphores" (2002), Uppsala Universitet
- Hermans, Theo, "Translation in systems: descriptive and system-oriented approaches explained" (1999), St. Jerome
- Ladmiral, Jean-Rene, "Sourciers et ciblistes", Revue d'esthetique, 12, pp.33~42 (1986)
- Nida, Eugene A., "The Theory and Practice of Translation" (1969), E.J. Brill
- "Dictionary of translation science with terms of semiotics, textology, linguistics, stylistics"[URL]
- Pym, Anthony, "Beyond Descriptive Translation Studies. Investigations in homage to Gideon Toury" (2008), John Benjamins
- Rodridriguez Rodridriguez, Beatriz, "Literary Translation Quality Assessment" (2007), Lincom Europa
- Rabadan, Rosa, "Equivalencia y traduccion. Problematica de la equivalencia translemica ingles-espanol" (1991), University of Leon
- Rosales Sequeiros, Xosé, "Degrees of acceptability in literary translation", Babel, 44(1), pp.1~14 (1998)
- Toury, Gideon, "The nature and role of norms in literary translation. in: Literature and translation : new perspectives in literary studies", pp.83~100 (1978), Acco
- Toury, Gideon, "Interlanguage and Its Manifestations in Translation", Meta, 24(2), pp.223~231 (1979)
- Toury, Gideon, "In search of a theory of translation" (1980), The Porter institute for poetics and semiotics, Tel Aviv University
- Toury, Gideon, "Translated Literature: System, Norm, Performance: Toward a TT-Oriented Approach to Literary Translation", Poetics Today, 2(4), pp.9~27 (1981)
- Toury, Gideon, "Descriptive Translation Studies and beyond" (1995), John Benjamins
- Weissbrod, Rachel, "Translation Research in the Framework of the Tel Aviv School of Poetics and Semiotic", Meta, 43(1), pp.35~45 (1998)
- Williams, Malcolm, "Translation Quality Assessment : An argumentation- centred approach" (2004), University of Ottawa Press
- Zlateva, Palma, "Translation: Text and Pre-Text 'Adequacy' and 'Acceptability' in Crosscultural Communication. in: Translation, history, and culture", pp.29~37 (1990), Pinter